Comments: 21
ehabm [2011-03-23 08:22:07 +0000 UTC]
great situation but the photo lacks "center of interest" for me. u need to pull the viewers eye somewhere particular at first !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fuxs In reply to ehabm [2011-03-23 19:19:49 +0000 UTC]
I think the "center of interest" is very well defined here, but thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bdwfh In reply to fuxs [2011-02-23 09:06:50 +0000 UTC]
that's what i thought you meant, but really couldn't be sure. yeah, distortion is a bitch as you go wider and wider. i would love a nice tilt-shift lens for architecture. 35mm works for me, although Simon seems to be having fun with 28mm
hmm, i thought it was pointed down, with you standing up. i'm just talking about keeping the vertical lines inside the frame parallel with the vertical lines of the frame itself. no biggie, just a thought.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fuxs In reply to bdwfh [2011-02-23 09:31:45 +0000 UTC]
Oh, fuck! Tell me about it [link]
It's ridiculous, I love my USM 1.4 (despite being an unreliable lens) already but I have seen the last commemorative combo M9 + Noctilux collectors edition and I felt aroused. Then I wanted to punch someone.
It's a dream.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kmetjurec [2011-02-20 19:03:20 +0000 UTC]
Yap, perfect!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fuxs In reply to Elizamac [2011-02-20 12:25:33 +0000 UTC]
For what I came to watch, they were waiting for the catechist. Poor bastards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
myraincheck [2011-02-19 19:13:16 +0000 UTC]
great composition using the door!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1