Comments: 32
matim01 [2010-11-24 12:37:57 +0000 UTC]
so dope
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MrSuma [2007-06-13 08:21:08 +0000 UTC]
по мне "N" не смое хорошее решение так нарисовать
а так все круто! молодец!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PELEk [2007-05-30 18:15:14 +0000 UTC]
good but hard to read
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
g2x In reply to PELEk [2007-05-31 03:47:35 +0000 UTC]
thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
csjwcr [2007-05-30 12:52:58 +0000 UTC]
nice work man, looks great
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arpad [2007-05-29 01:26:07 +0000 UTC]
Hi There, Roman.
I find it VERY hard to read, and despite knowing that a logo is more than a few clear glyphs, I still consider very important a certain level of readability. The 2nd character, the O looks like an A because of the angled low right. It doesn't have to be like the second "O", but there are no connection between these two same letters. The rest of the composition is far better, but the whole picture is unbalanced and not bonded to fit, as it drifts in a few diferent diagonals that tire the eyes for being inconsequential. I don't consider this a logotype, its more a type experiment, which by the way is very well achieved.
This is positive critiscism, its not offensive. I hope you understand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F0XXX [2007-05-28 22:41:59 +0000 UTC]
Good work on it, mate. ^^ Looks great. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
g2x In reply to roboflexx [2007-05-17 05:24:44 +0000 UTC]
в каком смысле ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kofbox [2007-05-16 10:44:57 +0000 UTC]
Альтернативный вариант лого неочень.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1