HOME | DD

GeneralTate β€” Boeing Skyfox

Published: 2013-07-27 02:04:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 3133; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 26
Redirect to original
Description The Boeing Skyfox was a twin-engined jet trainer aircraft, a highly upgraded development of the Lockheed T-33. It was designed as a primary trainer to compete with and replace the Cessna T-37 Tweety Bird. Besides its primary role as a trainer, the aircraft was envisioned to have other roles as well, including ground attack. The program was started by the Skyfox Corporation in 1983, and was acquired by Boeing in 1986.
The program included the replacement of the Allison J33-A-35 turbojet by two Garrett TFE731-3A turbofans. It also included an extensive redesign of the airframe. Only one prototype aircraft was built, and the program was later canceled due to lack of customers. It currently sits without engines at the Rouge Valley International Medford Airport.

General characteristics:
Crew: 2
Length: 13.41 m (46 ft)
Wingspan: 11.83 m (38 ft 10 in)
Height: 3.76 m (12 ft 4 in)
Airfoil: NACA 65-213
Empty weight: 3,856 kg (10,284 lb)
Loaded weight: 6,532 kg (14,400 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 7,364 kg (20,000 lb)
Powerplant: 2 Γ— Garrett TFE731-3A turbofan, 3,700 lbf (16.5 kN) each
Fuel capacity:
Internal fuel capacity: 3,191 litres
Total fuel capacity: 4,932 litres

Performance:
Range: N/A
Internal fuel: 1960 nmi (3,630 km)
Internal and external fuel: 2,600 nmi (4,815 km) ()
Service ceiling: 40,000 ft (12,192 m)
Rate of climb: 4900 ft/min (1,494 m/min) at sea level. (985 ft/min [300 m/min] at altitude)
Fuel consumption: 23.3 mg/(NΒ·s).

Armament:
A total of 2,700 kg of armament on 10 underwing hardpoints.
Related content
Comments: 12

Anzac-A1 [2016-09-26 08:53:49 +0000 UTC]

That looks so cool!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dinobatfan [2014-07-29 05:31:45 +0000 UTC]

I always thought this was a grand advancement of the venerable T-33 design and thought it was a shame that it never went beyond the one prototype.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bobcatt [2013-07-27 09:09:04 +0000 UTC]

nice never having beenweaponized she can beΒ  w flown by civilians shame she sitting

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralTate In reply to bobcatt [2013-07-28 03:07:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah out in the hot sun I go down to the airport every once in awhile she doesn't even have a landing gear assembly anymore Or cockpit internals, seats have been removed.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bobcatt In reply to GeneralTate [2013-07-28 05:12:15 +0000 UTC]

al the suff in cokpit willΒ  cause more damage left there if the its in the sun like that.Β  heat and liquid filled instruments..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralTate In reply to bobcatt [2013-07-28 05:19:13 +0000 UTC]

Yeah it needs to be restored big timeΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

StreakValkyrie [2013-07-27 03:06:11 +0000 UTC]

Definitely a interesting plane.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralTate In reply to StreakValkyrie [2013-07-27 04:17:51 +0000 UTC]

Yep

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CarrieMoore [2013-07-27 02:59:41 +0000 UTC]

Looks vaguely like an Me 262, but with the engines on the fuselage rather than the wings.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

Anzac-A1 In reply to CarrieMoore [2016-09-26 08:54:22 +0000 UTC]

Like the bastard lovechild of a 262 and an A-10.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DBsTreasure In reply to CarrieMoore [2013-07-27 18:29:39 +0000 UTC]

That was exactly what I was going to say! Its very reminicent of the ME-262

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GeneralTate In reply to CarrieMoore [2013-07-27 04:17:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I always thought that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0