HOME | DD

genkistamps — Michael Jackson Was Not a Pedo

Published: 2009-12-20 06:16:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 5438; Favourites: 253; Downloads: 45
Redirect to original
Description For the people who thought I was (or still am) an asshole with my other stamp, here's something for you.

Don't consider this an apology, I still think the guy was guilty.

The opposite of this stamp: [link]


EDIT: Comments disabled because your tears from your constant BAWWWWWing is getting my message inbox wet. And stop putting up links. It could lead to something else and you're just lying your ass off.
Related content
Comments: 13

LasCamisasDeRayas [2009-12-22 18:42:25 +0000 UTC]

You know what I've noticed? A lot of people who still believe this nonsense about Michael are racist. Just an interesting correlation. I mean, this shit-throwing his way happened a long, long time before 2003. It happened as soon as Thriller was smashing records. A bunch of Foghorn Leghorn old Dixie racists got together and said, "You know, we can't have no black kid being this popular and successful. Let's get all our Benjamin Franklins to tell our media that he's weird, gay, and molests kids? See how many CDs he sells then."

And now watch. Just like you called that other fan up there names, you're going to assume I'm a black person, too, and start spewing the hate. Well, I'm not. I'm as white as mayonnaise. I love Michael for his heart, and that's what you people will never begin to understand.

Everyone who called him a child molester is only incapable of understanding how he could love so many children so deeply. How he could love strangers. In a world full of hate, Michael was all love, so what did people do? They tried to make him a deplorable person, make people hate them. And those who were getting paid or were too hateful themselves to understand him still think that. But those who can fathom his love could never.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

genkistamps In reply to LasCamisasDeRayas [2009-12-22 20:14:05 +0000 UTC]

I'm not racist. Where did you draw that conclusion? It's the most cop-out argument you can come up with.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

asharikinomiya [2009-12-21 06:58:45 +0000 UTC]

Your in for a shock. Jordan Chandler has now confirmed that Michael NEVER touched him.

Look it up on Yahoo news. Michael was indeed innocent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

genkistamps In reply to asharikinomiya [2009-12-21 18:14:14 +0000 UTC]

I'm floored you're so hellbent on "CHANGING MY EVIL WAYS."

What, is the notion of someone disagreeing with you too much to bear?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

asharikinomiya In reply to genkistamps [2009-12-21 19:39:58 +0000 UTC]

Since when did I say you were evil? Instead of putting words into people's mouths, why don't you just heed my advice.

I am disagreeing with your opinion, because you are wrong. Despite the evidence that suggests otherwise, you still continue to falsely accuse an innocent man. That is what I'm trying to stop.

I have always been sick and tired of innocent people suffering all because of the greed and miscalculations of others. What do I think of people who frame innocent people?

They disgust me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

genkistamps In reply to asharikinomiya [2009-12-21 20:54:25 +0000 UTC]

"I am disagreeing with your opinion, because you are wrong. Despite the evidence that suggests otherwise, you still continue to falsely accuse an innocent man. That is what I'm trying to stop."

Opinions can't be right or wrong. What about my right to decide what I believe? I haven't told you you're wrong, I've told you I disagree with you.

And one person on DA isn't going to change the minds of the populous. You're only trying to "STOP ME" to shut me up because you disagree with me.

learn to first amendment please.

As far as I'm concerned, you're just another loony fan. Get in line because I have loony fans of more stuff waiting to crucify me because I dared to speak my mind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

LasCamisasDeRayas In reply to genkistamps [2009-12-22 18:35:23 +0000 UTC]

How about TWO people?

Or better yet, how about a couple of videos, comprised of FACTS?

[link]

[link]

HIS OWN MOTHER said he never committed those crimes, you know. Just in case you need one more icepick thrust through your ignorant skull.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

genkistamps In reply to LasCamisasDeRayas [2009-12-22 20:19:41 +0000 UTC]

It's pretty clear I'm not going to change my mind. You can whine and call me ignorant all you want, why are you and your little fan friends so hellbent on trying to MAKE ME SEE THE LIGHT when clearly I don't care how many amateur Youtube videos you send me, I have an opinion and I'm going to keep it.

Go ahead and call me ignorant, because I know that's the card you're going to pull and the favorite word of MJ fans.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

asharikinomiya In reply to genkistamps [2009-12-21 21:33:01 +0000 UTC]

As I have mentioned, freedom of speech is one thing. Abusing it is another.

There we go. Your resorting to name calling. A sign of a weak arguement.

You never even researched the trials, did you? and you have not even tried to counter my claims. Another sign of a weak arguement. Well then. I'll show you how to argue. Here are reliable sources on both cases;

Chandler case;

[link] (Evan Chandler's leaked phone conversation.)

Aphrodite Jones' book 'Michael Jackson Conspiracy'. The most factual book out there. She too believed Michael was guilty. Then she did a long reseach. She changed her mind when she discovered the evidence that hardly got out to the public.

Arvizo case;

[link] (Janet Arvizo claims that Michael tried to kidnap her and her family using a hotair balloon...I am dead serious..)

[link] (Macaulay Culkin defends Michael in court)

Again, you never answered me. Why did Mr Chandler accept the $2million payout to drop the case? He either cares more about money than his own child, or this was all to get Jackson's money. In both cases thats what it was all about. Money. Evan Chandler had a past grudge against Jackson and the Arvizo's had a long history of extortion attempts. Yet you still believe them?

I am not here to crucify you. I do not even hate you. Hatred is for the weak. I am merely trying to show people the inconsistances of the trials. But you are not even listning to me, even when I am trying to be polite. If you truly are interested in the trials then ask me questions and I will do my best to explain.

If you don't like his music, fair enough. But do not use false allegations to justify your dislike.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TF-Wheelie-Hornet [2009-12-20 20:37:36 +0000 UTC]

Micheal Jackson was definitely a weirdo and was a child in his mind slightly, but I don't think he was a pedophile. Because of the way all the operations and such left him, he wasn't able to do "it" anymore which is why his kids were conceived artificially.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LasCamisasDeRayas In reply to TF-Wheelie-Hornet [2009-12-22 18:44:08 +0000 UTC]

What are you talking about? His kids are his.

But otherwise I completely agree with what you're saying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

genkistamps In reply to LasCamisasDeRayas [2009-12-22 20:29:22 +0000 UTC]

They are his kids biologically if I remember correctly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shinyjackets77 [2009-12-20 14:33:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

I can add it to my other stamps.

Would you mind watching these? I believe they may change your mind.
[link]
[link]

There's also a book out called "Was Michael Jackson Framed?". You should really look for it.

I am only pushing this because people like you don't seem to accept that 12 jurors all sat down and said it was a crock of bull, and for some reason you can't accept it.

If I have to go door to door to tell everyone who still believes it that it isn't true, I will.

But I would probably scare the life out of them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0