Comments: 57
road-tripping [2016-07-22 17:22:06 +0000 UTC]
This is a fantastic idea :0 I'd love to have a header image!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bowba [2015-07-26 19:43:04 +0000 UTC]
I completely agree! Thank you for this lovely suggestion. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Roseruu [2015-01-13 18:33:49 +0000 UTC]
I would absolutely love a feature like this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GinkgoWerkstatt In reply to Roseruu [2015-01-14 10:16:47 +0000 UTC]
I still hope that we get something like this one day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
znow-white [2013-11-19 18:47:05 +0000 UTC]
wide widget is wide (.............................)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GinkgoWerkstatt In reply to Plague-Doc-Matteo [2013-11-16 07:13:40 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, sometimes it looks really messy on pages D:
I always try that both columns have nearly the same height. Well for my resolution... because i never know how it looks like for others.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Plague-Doc-Matteo In reply to GinkgoWerkstatt [2013-11-17 00:12:50 +0000 UTC]
Ah yeah. I've noticed on mine it varies because my journals tend to be different lengths so that changes it a lot. That and sometimes the recent deviation widget changes depending on what my newest thing is. most of the time its layouts of my latest MOC. So those are usually wider than they are taller.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Outof4mmo [2013-11-15 00:53:47 +0000 UTC]
Really good idea! I support!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane [2013-11-14 17:43:51 +0000 UTC]
Sort of neat idea. While i agree that i would love to have "something full width" on the top of my page, i wouldn't want a custom box like that – it just doesn't look very appealing to me. Instead, i'd prefer something like facebook's cover images. (I know, i'm actually suggestion a facebook feature for dA, how evil of me! ) So yeah, something like that, but a bit more customizable: in its most basic form, it would just hold one large image (but limited to a max height for obvious reasons). But if one choses, it can be filled with a few fancy "templates", or just plain text or what have you. Here i agree with your suggestions; but again, i wouldn't want it to sit in an extra-wide gruse-box.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to GinkgoWerkstatt [2013-11-14 18:14:36 +0000 UTC]
Ah okay, yeah, that would be a nice workaround!
The way i just saw it in my head, though, was an extension of the blues bar (the one that holds your basic stats). Of course, this could be achieved with a margin-top: -10px or something like that, but still..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
2753Productions [2013-11-14 16:50:47 +0000 UTC]
I would LOVE this! For instance on my group, there are times when a lot of information has to be shared, but it takes up so much vertical space because of how the widget is formatted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArtByCher [2013-11-14 14:21:04 +0000 UTC]
This would be a great one to use as a introduction to your profile!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ikue [2013-11-14 12:12:49 +0000 UTC]
Great idea!
I'd love this if it were a carousel of thumbnails for a gallery or favs that just scrolls along indefinitely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GinkgoWerkstatt In reply to Ikue [2013-11-14 16:35:09 +0000 UTC]
Maybe that could be an option for this widget. Like either you have some thumbnail carousel or going to use HTML/CSS to style it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ABlipinTime [2013-11-14 05:24:56 +0000 UTC]
It'd be another premium member feature for sure. Frankly, I don't see how much more useful it would be than just properly using the custom widget we currently have. But that's just me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GinkgoWerkstatt In reply to ABlipinTime [2013-11-14 07:47:16 +0000 UTC]
Well, that would be up to dA if it would be for PM only or not.
Using CSS in custom widgets is just a bug, a bug that is not supported at all. Also i hate the massive loading times because of the big background images everywhere. Also you are limited to what you can do and you also can place the widgets to certain areas (especially if you have added the journal and ID widget at your profile).
Additionally with full HTML/CSS support you would be less limited with styling.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
GinkgoWerkstatt In reply to MattsyKun [2013-11-15 15:44:15 +0000 UTC]
Kind of. You can make use of code that already exist for dA, but that is all. Just eh combination of those different elements makes it possible to add all those things to the custom widgets.
That's why it is not officially supported by dA.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ABlipinTime In reply to GinkgoWerkstatt [2013-11-15 05:29:48 +0000 UTC]
Interesting. Then maybe could change that for the Custom widget. Also, I don't imagine full HTML support would be allowed since that would include the script tag - and people can do some nasty stuff with that. Thus, it would have to go through a filter to strip out those tags.
I do imagine you're thinking the box - new or old - should be something as flexible as the journal, correct?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
maytel [2013-11-14 01:35:42 +0000 UTC]
YES! I do want this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>