Comments: 38
ForgottenDemigod [2018-04-01 09:04:26 +0000 UTC]
Conodonts!
I almost never see them on illustrations and they were supposed to be so common!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to ForgottenDemigod [2018-07-01 19:44:07 +0000 UTC]
Yes, their "teeth" are so abundant in Siluro-Devonian sediments that they must have been everywhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForgottenDemigod In reply to Gogosardina [2018-07-05 23:18:08 +0000 UTC]
I wonder how much it's a result of most of people becoming paleoartists because of the cool factor and not wanting to have their paintings/drawings spammed with a creature that looks like it escaped from a cartoon XD .
Or is most of paleoart done to specs where the commissioner dictates what exact animals should be there?
Also, conodonts are probably most disappointing fossil animal ever. All these demonic-looking apparatuses and it turns out it belonged to these googly eyed snake-like things XD .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Atlantis536 [2017-07-14 13:47:01 +0000 UTC]
"Entelognathus primordialis: Newly Discovered Fish Has Surprisingly Modern Jaw"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hattushilish [2014-03-19 06:08:25 +0000 UTC]
you wrote a paper that appeared on Nature?! wow Congrats. I bet youy can imagine how many of us dream of publishing something there or in Science. They have quite the impact factor (Considering they are natural science journals)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to Hattushilish [2014-03-24 06:17:01 +0000 UTC]
Yeah - took nearly a year of back-breaking effort though to get the manuscript through 4+ rounds of revision.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hattushilish In reply to Gogosardina [2014-03-24 06:23:26 +0000 UTC]
Still, congratulations! you and your colleagues have deen working in unveiling some of the most fascinating events in vertebrate evolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PDTillman [2014-03-16 03:58:10 +0000 UTC]
Re Ozarkodina: are the goggle-eyes real, or artistic license?
Definitely cute!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to PDTillman [2014-03-17 09:36:28 +0000 UTC]
Ozarkodina is only known from isolated "tooth" elements - I based this reconstruction on complete specimens of Clydagnathus which has large protruding eyes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Creepy-Stag-Waffle [2013-11-25 13:55:46 +0000 UTC]
I saw this picture in my science room at school!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to Creepy-Stag-Waffle [2013-11-26 05:17:41 +0000 UTC]
Cool, glad to know you're science department is keeping up to date!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
avancna [2013-11-09 03:14:13 +0000 UTC]
Have they found any more to Wangolepis sinensis?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to Gogosardina [2013-11-14 04:44:51 +0000 UTC]
But not enough to make an assumption on what it looked like?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to avancna [2013-11-19 03:40:48 +0000 UTC]
No, thats not what I mean...
Cannot say more at present. Suffice to say that Entelognathus is the tip of the iceberg.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Martiitram [2013-09-29 17:38:38 +0000 UTC]
So this buys name was "perfect jaw".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to Martiitram [2013-09-30 06:16:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, "entelos" is greek for complete or perfect (in the adjective sense of "Having all the required elements")
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Martiitram In reply to Gogosardina [2013-09-30 11:50:34 +0000 UTC]
I started learning a bit ancient greek and ancient latin when I started learning more about prehistoric animals and future evolution.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
TitanoRex [2013-09-28 03:40:31 +0000 UTC]
mother or mercy, we where once placoderms!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bensen-daniel [2013-09-27 06:21:11 +0000 UTC]
The ancestor of sharks and bony fishes had bones! Look at the BONES, man!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pr0teusUnbound [2013-09-26 23:58:48 +0000 UTC]
youre the one who made this? niiice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gogosardina In reply to Zippo4k [2013-09-27 09:04:22 +0000 UTC]
Thanks - the rasp like jaws are weird. Entelo's skull bones are covered in long linear ridges. At the upper jaw, the bone curves inwards to form a half-cm wide horizontal shelf against which the lower jaw occludes. While there are no teeth on the shelf, the long ridges grade into these little wart-like things that create the rasp-like surface.
So although Entelo didn't have teeth, it did have a rough jaw surface so was probably grabbing something with its mouth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to Gogosardina [2013-09-27 10:21:37 +0000 UTC]
Oh, and great deal of ongoing effort goes into conodont research - after all they are important to oil companies! Just recently Murdock et al (2013) mapped out the dental apparatus of Panderodus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zippo4k In reply to Zippo4k [2013-09-26 23:37:09 +0000 UTC]
Also "uh" was a type-o of "Oh, yes!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Boverisuchus [2013-09-26 09:19:48 +0000 UTC]
We plate-less placoderms, who so densely populate earth and sea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pilsator [2013-09-26 07:20:12 +0000 UTC]
WTF. Awesome stuff. And an awesome illustration!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orionide5 [2013-09-26 05:24:26 +0000 UTC]
Also, is it just me or do your conodonts have different-colored eyes?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to Orionide5 [2013-09-26 05:47:23 +0000 UTC]
They're swimming near the surface = chromatic variability due to sunlight glinting off them. Was inspired by swimming through a shoal of Chromis atripectoralis on Ningaloo Reef.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orionide5 [2013-09-26 05:21:55 +0000 UTC]
Sharks are secondarily boneless? That's crazy and awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gogosardina In reply to Orionide5 [2013-09-26 06:52:37 +0000 UTC]
Sharks are derived acanthodians (acanthodians = paraphyletic assemblage of stem-chondrichthyans)... THAT'S crazy and awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0