HOME | DD

Gogosardina — Entelognathus #1: In the Silurian seas of Yunnan

Published: 2013-09-26 05:16:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 19207; Favourites: 289; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description 2012-2013. acrylics on card, digital & photography.

c. 423,000,000 bp, late Silurian (Ludlow), Qujing, Yunnan, China.

A trio of Entelognathus swim over a shallow Silurian seabed. Swarms of worm-like conodont animals (Ozarkodina snajdri) wriggle about them while a jawless galeaspid (Dunyu longiforus) rests on the sand. A marauding Guiyu oneiros, one of the earliest bony fishes, cruises in the distance.

Cover art for =
Min Zhu, Xiaobo Yu, Per Erik Ahlberg, Brian Choo (that’s me!), Jing Lu, Tuo Qiao, Qingming Qu, Wenjin Zhao, Liantao Jia, Henning Blom & You’an Zhu (2013) A Silurian placoderm with osteichthyan-like marginal jaw bones. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature12617

www.nature.com/nature/journal/…

I was utterly blown away when I first laid eyes on this fossil.

The majority of fossil discoveries worth publishing about can either strengthen previous studies or dish out little parcels of new data. These allow us to slowly piece together the history of life on Earth, but do not significantly rock the boat. But every now and then you are confronted with a jaw-dropping specimen, a fossil that says, “forget the textbooks, THIS is how it happened…” Momentous discoveries like Lucy the Australopithecus and the first batch of Chinese feathered dinosaurs that unleashed a tsunami of new information, bringing sudden clarity to our view of the distant past, and forcing us to rethink what we thought we knew about evolution. Now joining their ranks is a little armoured fish called Entelognathus, described in Nature by an international team of researchers led by Prof. Zhu Min at IVPP, Beijing.

Entelognathus primordialis (“primordial complete jaw”) lived in coastal seas during the Late Silurian, about 423 million years ago, over sediments that are now exposed as the Kuanti Formation, near the town of Qujing, Yunnan. About 20cm long, Entelognathus had a heavily armoured head and trunk, toothless jaws and tiny eyes set within large bony goggles. Besides the weird eyes, at first glance it appears to be a fairly ordinary arthrodiran placoderm. Placoderms are an extinct group of heavily armoured fishes that are generally regarded as the most primitive of the gnathostomes (vertebrates with jaws). But Entelognathus has proved to be something far more bizarre and significant.

Whereas all other known placoderms had simple outer surfaces on the jaws and cheeks, each containing a few large bones, Entelognathus has a much more complex arrangement of smaller bones. They include a maxilla and premaxilla on the upper jaw, a dentary on the lower jaw, as well as multiple cheek elements. This is a configuration identical to that seen in the skull modern osteichthyans, the backboned animals with bony skeletons including the bony fishes and tetrapods (limbed vertebrates). Indeed, it is effectively the same configuration seen in our own human skulls.

This astounding discovery throws a spanner in the works of some long held ideas of vertebrate evolution. Besides osteichthyans, the other living gnathostomes are the chondrichthyans, the group including sharks and rays. These have almost no bone in their bodies and skeletons made of cartilage. Until very recently, it was widely accepted that this condition represented the primitive state among the living jawed vertebrates. In other words, the most recent common ancestor of all gnathostomes would have looked something like a shark, devoid of armour and with a largely cartilaginous skull. An extinct group of unarmoured fishes, the acanthodians (which kind of resemble small spiny sharks) were thought to be close to the base of the modern gnathostome radiation.

Both osteichthyans and placoderms have skulls made of large bony plates. Similarly, the paired appendages of both groups are supported by bony girdles (although a placoderm-like dermal pelvic girdle is only found in the earliest osteichthyans). However it has been widely assumed that the two groups were unrelated, thus implying that the immediate ancestors of the osteichthyans developed their bony skulls from scratch. It was even suggested that the jaws of placoderms evolved independently of other gnathostomes.

Based on the available fossil evidence from the Devonian Period (419.2-358.9 million years ago) the “shark-like” scenario was sound. But until very recently we had little idea of what the placoderms and osteichthyans from the earlier Silurian Period looked like (443.4–419.2 million years ago). Then, within the last decade, superbly preserved articulated fish skeletons began to appear from the Silurian Kuanti Formation in southwest China. The anatomy of these bizarre creatures confounded the scientists who examined them (including Zhu) and prompted them to start questioning the prevailing wisdom. For example, the fish Guiyu, first described by Min and his colleagues in 2009, was clearly an osteichthyan, but one with placoderm-like pectoral and pelvic girdles.

What began as a trickle with Guiyu has become a flood with Entelognathus. Whereas Guiyu is a bony fish with features previously thought to be restricted to placoderms, Entelognathus is a placoderm with features previously thought to be restricted to bony fishes. Additionally, when we look at the inside of the skull of Entelognathus, we find the anatomy intermediate between placoderms and one hand, and both osteichthyans and chrondrichthyians on the other. The implications are clear: The last common ancestor of all the living jawed vertebrates, including us, was an armoured placoderm. Osteichthyans did not independently acquire their bony skeletons, they simply inherited them from their placoderm ancestors. Acanthodians and chondrichthyans represent a single sister-lineage to the osteichthyans, one that progressively reduced the bone content of their skulls and skeletons.

Entelognathus was not directly ancestral to modern gnathostomes. Given that it lived alongside more advanced jawed fishes like Guiyu, it was a little bit too late for that. Based on fragments from around the world, the two main living groups (osteichthyans and chondrichthyans) must have emerged at some point from the Late Ordovician to Early Silurian. However, Entelognathus from the Late Silurian represents a hitherto unknown grade of animal whose anatomy has brought us much closer to the common ancestry of all the modern jawed-and-backboned critters than anything previously seen.

We have only just started to scratch the surface of Silurian gnathostome diversity. Expect more momentous discoveries like this in the near future.
Related content
Comments: 38

Cerberus-Chaos [2024-02-11 23:36:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ForgottenDemigod [2018-04-01 09:04:26 +0000 UTC]

Conodonts!

I almost never see them on illustrations and they were supposed to be so common!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to ForgottenDemigod [2018-07-01 19:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Yes, their "teeth" are so abundant in Siluro-Devonian sediments that they must have been everywhere. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ForgottenDemigod In reply to Gogosardina [2018-07-05 23:18:08 +0000 UTC]

I wonder how much it's a result of most of people becoming paleoartists because of the cool factor and not wanting to have their paintings/drawings spammed with a creature that looks like it escaped from a cartoon XD .

Or is most of paleoart done to specs where the commissioner dictates what exact animals should be there?


Also, conodonts are probably most disappointing fossil animal ever. All these demonic-looking apparatuses and it turns out it belonged to these googly eyed snake-like things XD .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Atlantis536 [2017-07-14 13:47:01 +0000 UTC]

"Entelognathus primordialis: Newly Discovered Fish Has Surprisingly Modern Jaw"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hattushilish [2014-03-19 06:08:25 +0000 UTC]

you wrote a paper that appeared on Nature?! wow Congrats. I bet youy can imagine how many of us dream of publishing something there or in Science. They have quite the impact factor (Considering they are natural science journals)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to Hattushilish [2014-03-24 06:17:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah - took nearly a year of back-breaking effort though to get the manuscript through 4+ rounds of revision.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hattushilish In reply to Gogosardina [2014-03-24 06:23:26 +0000 UTC]

Still, congratulations! you and your colleagues have deen working in unveiling some of the most fascinating events in vertebrate evolution.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PDTillman [2014-03-16 03:58:10 +0000 UTC]

Re Ozarkodina:  are the goggle-eyes real, or artistic license?
 Definitely cute!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to PDTillman [2014-03-17 09:36:28 +0000 UTC]

Ozarkodina is only known from isolated "tooth" elements - I based this reconstruction on complete specimens of Clydagnathus which has large protruding eyes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Creepy-Stag-Waffle [2013-11-25 13:55:46 +0000 UTC]

I saw this picture in my science room at school! 

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to Creepy-Stag-Waffle [2013-11-26 05:17:41 +0000 UTC]

Cool, glad to know you're science department is keeping up to date!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

avancna [2013-11-09 03:14:13 +0000 UTC]

Have they found any more to Wangolepis sinensis?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to avancna [2013-11-14 03:46:04 +0000 UTC]

Very probably.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

avancna In reply to Gogosardina [2013-11-14 04:44:51 +0000 UTC]

But not enough to make an assumption on what it looked like?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to avancna [2013-11-19 03:40:48 +0000 UTC]

No, thats not what I mean...

Cannot say more at present. Suffice to say that Entelognathus is the tip of the iceberg.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

avancna In reply to Gogosardina [2013-11-19 15:31:03 +0000 UTC]

Ooooooh....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WanderingAlbatross [2013-10-17 21:37:14 +0000 UTC]

You always do the best fish stuff

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Martiitram [2013-09-29 17:38:38 +0000 UTC]

So this buys name was "perfect jaw".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to Martiitram [2013-09-30 06:16:11 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, "entelos" is greek for complete or perfect (in the adjective sense of "Having all the required elements")

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Martiitram In reply to Gogosardina [2013-09-30 11:50:34 +0000 UTC]

I started learning a bit ancient greek and ancient latin when I started learning more about prehistoric animals and future evolution.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

JWArtwork [2013-09-28 15:54:59 +0000 UTC]

Holy sh*t, this definately looks 3D-ish! Very well done, I must say, especially the fish in the foreground. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TitanoRex [2013-09-28 03:40:31 +0000 UTC]

mother or mercy, we where once placoderms!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kantata98 [2013-09-28 03:30:16 +0000 UTC]

I saw the article concerning this fish with your drawing very well done

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bensen-daniel [2013-09-27 06:21:11 +0000 UTC]

The ancestor of sharks and bony fishes had bones! Look at the BONES, man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pr0teusUnbound [2013-09-26 23:58:48 +0000 UTC]

youre the one who made this? niiice!   

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zippo4k [2013-09-26 23:36:07 +0000 UTC]

Uh, yes! This is a beautiful painting! I would love to have a painting like this hanging in my house one day.It's interesting that the margin of the upper-jaw seems to have a rasp-like texture to it in this painting.
I also like how, if you look closer, you can see the eye is just the dark oval & that the grey tissue is soft skin surrounding the eye. I also really appreciate that you went through the trouble to actually illustrate the other two Entelognathus in the background rather then just cut-and-pasting the animal in the foreground. It gives everything a more dynamic and realistic feel (even if that's what you did for the conodonts! The fact they're so small and abundant, and that you gave them enough variability in their postures compensates for that.)

Speaking of conodonts, has there been much work done on those guys lately? Last I heard we just learned what they looked like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Gogosardina In reply to Zippo4k [2013-09-27 09:04:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks - the rasp like jaws are weird. Entelo's skull bones are covered in long linear ridges. At the upper jaw, the bone curves inwards to form a half-cm wide horizontal shelf against which the lower jaw occludes. While there are no teeth on the shelf, the long ridges grade into these little wart-like things that create the rasp-like surface.

 

So although Entelo didn't have teeth, it did have a rough jaw surface so was probably grabbing something with its mouth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to Gogosardina [2013-09-27 10:21:37 +0000 UTC]

Oh, and great deal of ongoing effort goes into conodont research - after all they are important to oil companies! Just recently Murdock et al (2013) mapped out the dental apparatus of Panderodus.

 

 

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zippo4k In reply to Zippo4k [2013-09-26 23:37:09 +0000 UTC]

Also "uh" was a type-o of "Oh, yes!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Boverisuchus [2013-09-26 09:19:48 +0000 UTC]

We plate-less placoderms, who so densely populate earth and sea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pilsator In reply to Boverisuchus [2013-09-26 15:24:50 +0000 UTC]

On a geekier note, shame that _Caenagnathus_ is preoccupied - it would have been spot on

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Boverisuchus In reply to pilsator [2013-09-27 02:39:02 +0000 UTC]

cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pilsator [2013-09-26 07:20:12 +0000 UTC]

WTF. Awesome stuff. And an awesome illustration!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Orionide5 [2013-09-26 05:24:26 +0000 UTC]

Also, is it just me or do your conodonts have different-colored eyes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to Orionide5 [2013-09-26 05:47:23 +0000 UTC]

They're swimming near the surface = chromatic variability due to sunlight glinting off them. Was inspired by swimming through a shoal of Chromis atripectoralis on Ningaloo Reef. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Orionide5 [2013-09-26 05:21:55 +0000 UTC]

Sharks are secondarily boneless? That's crazy and awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gogosardina In reply to Orionide5 [2013-09-26 06:52:37 +0000 UTC]

Sharks are derived acanthodians (acanthodians = paraphyletic assemblage of stem-chondrichthyans)... THAT'S crazy and awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0