HOME | DD

Gonzale β€” romanticism

Published: 2006-11-17 09:55:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 2759; Favourites: 87; Downloads: 72
Redirect to original
Description double exposure on agfa ultra 100
Related content
Comments: 43

ameliemarron [2009-07-09 19:43:27 +0000 UTC]

featured it here

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jiar [2006-11-22 17:15:40 +0000 UTC]

beautiful picture. love her eyes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

orphanedland [2006-11-20 17:18:42 +0000 UTC]

The American Romanticism...
The Modern Times Romanticisim...
...
...
But "Romanticisim"not at all

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kerian [2006-11-20 10:38:01 +0000 UTC]

do you expose both shots at the "normal" aperture and times when doing a double (or triple ..) exposure or do you underexpose them? (like half the exposure time necessary etc)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to kerian [2006-11-20 10:39:35 +0000 UTC]

i expose them normally.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kerian In reply to Gonzale [2006-11-20 10:45:15 +0000 UTC]

oh thanks for the answer, that's a thing i was wondering about for months but never looked up ..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to kerian [2006-11-20 10:48:15 +0000 UTC]

in fact i tried for some shots to step down, but they ended up being underexposed.. so yeah.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KreuzerArt [2006-11-19 00:49:30 +0000 UTC]

Amazing composition.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

colombo [2006-11-18 23:29:02 +0000 UTC]

ah, the colors of france...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Guido101 [2006-11-18 20:22:23 +0000 UTC]

wow, tres beau travail !!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

blacksomething [2006-11-18 18:20:35 +0000 UTC]

this is beautiful. i absolutely love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

recklesslibertine [2006-11-18 17:07:30 +0000 UTC]

This is tender and touching. very VERY well done!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

claytes [2006-11-18 00:50:09 +0000 UTC]

im going to do a double exposure on a canon 20d. it is possible! i will prove it! film is dead!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

phlegmatic [2006-11-17 16:38:40 +0000 UTC]

she wants that coke so bad but she's stuck in anothe dimension. poor ghost dimension girl.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xelusiivesoul [2006-11-17 16:31:33 +0000 UTC]

Did you do this at random?
And shouldn't it be triple exposure? hahah

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to xelusiivesoul [2006-11-17 17:11:47 +0000 UTC]

no, the other one was triple-exposed by mistake.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

papiland [2006-11-17 14:42:06 +0000 UTC]

Very cool! I like this one also. She looks like a sugar junkie

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

qiepinkie [2006-11-17 14:04:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lone-Wolf01 [2006-11-17 13:26:08 +0000 UTC]

Ah, this is fantastic! I've never been able to do a decent in-camera double exposure. Do you plan yours or do you just click and hope it works? I remember one of my photography teachers once shot a roll of nude portraiture, then accidentally reused the film when doing some shoots of architecture. Some of them turned out pretty well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Lone-Wolf01 [2006-11-17 15:49:56 +0000 UTC]

i wrote down the empty place i took photos of.. but i never had the time to read what i wrote before taking a photo.. so yeah. half planned.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lordgonz [2006-11-17 13:23:49 +0000 UTC]

macdo c'est très sex.

j'envisage d'y amener les chandelles et la nappe rouge un jour. que dis-tu de l'idΓ©e ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to lordgonz [2006-11-17 15:49:03 +0000 UTC]

oh non c'est les seuls verres qu'ils ont à la cafèt de l'ecole pour nous servir des breuvages. y compris café. ça fait bizarre.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lordgonz In reply to Gonzale [2006-11-17 16:49:00 +0000 UTC]

ah effectivement. toujours est-il qu'improviser un diner aux chandelles Γ  MacDo, j'adorerais. Et faire des photos bien sΓ»r

si je passe sur Paris un jour tu es motivΓ©e ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to lordgonz [2006-11-17 17:41:35 +0000 UTC]

yep !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lordgonz In reply to Gonzale [2006-11-17 17:59:30 +0000 UTC]

super !!! merci

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cultureddirtbag [2006-11-17 13:01:10 +0000 UTC]

There's something cute about it and something that's deeper than cute.
And looking at this Emiliana Torrini suddenly begins playing in the back of my head.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Miauzz [2006-11-17 12:23:31 +0000 UTC]

planned? It's fantastic anyway...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Miauzz [2006-11-17 15:46:38 +0000 UTC]

not really planned.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Miauzz In reply to Gonzale [2006-11-17 16:14:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Suzage [2006-11-17 12:18:45 +0000 UTC]

That's lovely. The leaves and her shy appearance, and the way her face is framed by the table; lovely.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Suzage [2006-11-17 15:48:18 +0000 UTC]

yes the table framing, thats what i liked

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tortuegraphics [2006-11-17 10:56:07 +0000 UTC]

Γ§a marche!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

p0rtishead [2006-11-17 10:42:59 +0000 UTC]

cool stuff going on around here

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

darkkavenger [2006-11-17 10:41:47 +0000 UTC]

tu fais tes doubles expos avec quel appareil ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to darkkavenger [2006-11-17 15:46:57 +0000 UTC]

un pentax p30n.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

darkkavenger In reply to Gonzale [2006-11-17 16:34:51 +0000 UTC]

sympatoche! jolie photo en tt cas

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SteliosKa [2006-11-17 10:05:14 +0000 UTC]

so damn lucky. love it. I'm going for colour double exposures

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alfrancis [2006-11-17 10:04:20 +0000 UTC]

Impressed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

quizzard87 [2006-11-17 10:03:10 +0000 UTC]

haha, this one is cool...longing for a coke

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zort [2006-11-17 09:59:23 +0000 UTC]

agfa ultra - nice cute art colors!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zort [2006-11-17 09:59:07 +0000 UTC]

ART!

(im scanning and terribly bored... get your ass on msn, retard)

ART!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

godhatesphysics In reply to zort [2006-11-18 00:19:38 +0000 UTC]

You have an ass.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gonzale In reply to zort [2006-11-17 15:47:42 +0000 UTC]

you know, i'm at school during the day
i'm coming on msn now so youd better be here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0