HOME | DD

gtlowes — HMS Bullwark

Published: 2007-09-07 23:20:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 3740; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 82
Redirect to original
Description Graphite on 16x13 hot press watercolour paper
thanks for looking
Related content
Comments: 19

Meltin [2010-09-23 03:45:23 +0000 UTC]

I can't find any evidence that gives away the fact that this is a drawing. Usually you can spot something,you know? This is truly amazing. I sincerely mean that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dazza-mate [2010-04-13 02:03:56 +0000 UTC]

I also thought this was a photo, excellent work, perfect detail as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to dazza-mate [2010-04-14 21:38:50 +0000 UTC]

Cheers dazza mate

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Viktalon [2010-04-08 11:59:34 +0000 UTC]

Nice looking carrier, tho' it was an old design but still looks modern. I see WW2 British carriers are better looking than those from the US, especially the hull and bridge design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to Viktalon [2010-04-08 23:24:28 +0000 UTC]

It is, my father in law served on her in 1958

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Viktalon In reply to gtlowes [2010-04-17 11:19:31 +0000 UTC]

Those early British carriers are still very impressive by today's standard. They are notable for their ruggedness to withstand damage and rivaled only by Japanese carriers. Only the Ark Royal was sunk by a single torpedo hits while most others were able to survive under heavy damage. In the other hand WW2 US carriers were very vulnerable against torpedoes, bombs and gunfire. During the battle of Midway a Japanese torpedo smashed deep into USS Yorktown's fuel tank before explode. Despite the good damage control the Americans were unable to save her from destruction. Similar case goes to Lexington, Hornet and Wasp as well. Most of them can be easily finished off by just several hit unlike British carriers. British carriers, by the way, pioneered the construction of armored flight deck and hull.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to Viktalon [2010-04-17 13:27:21 +0000 UTC]

Interesting, I think he said it still had a wooden deck!
all the best mate

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Viktalon In reply to gtlowes [2010-04-18 17:20:50 +0000 UTC]

Really? Wooden deck in the late 50's? Well I guess it must be at certain compartments, certainly not the main flight deck. Do you know anything about Bullwark's stat?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to Viktalon [2010-04-20 22:30:37 +0000 UTC]

Not too sure mate, I'll ask him

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Viktalon In reply to gtlowes [2010-04-27 04:57:13 +0000 UTC]

Or maybe I can find the info online.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to Viktalon [2010-04-29 01:21:44 +0000 UTC]

I found some you might like
[link]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sunnyg3 [2008-01-18 00:34:39 +0000 UTC]

holy...
I thought that was a photo until i saw that it was under traditional art/drawings. This is the kinda art that i dream about making.
So in other words, I Love it ^^!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to sunnyg3 [2008-01-18 22:40:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much for your support and the fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thea-Nu [2007-09-17 13:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Oh my, amazing work! Especially on the water

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to Thea-Nu [2007-09-20 01:48:34 +0000 UTC]

Thank you glad you like

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

R-B [2007-09-13 21:53:18 +0000 UTC]

That's awesome, love that skewed perspective

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to R-B [2007-09-14 21:22:14 +0000 UTC]

Cheers RB

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yahoo4yoo [2007-09-07 23:29:53 +0000 UTC]

Whoa.
The detail is incredible. It looks like a photograph. Amazing job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gtlowes In reply to yahoo4yoo [2007-09-08 00:28:14 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0