Comments: 26
UltimaFenrir [2009-01-30 17:29:58 +0000 UTC]
Wow this is really cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Almightypickle [2009-01-29 22:57:32 +0000 UTC]
i love the coloring of this, has a nice brightness to it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lexi-Autumn [2009-01-29 06:33:48 +0000 UTC]
Gorgeous. Just absolutely gorgeous. I applaud you, and wish you luck in the contest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
theatre-of-solitude [2009-01-28 16:10:30 +0000 UTC]
Pure beauty is in chaos.
Good luck in the contest. Great work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Meru-sensei [2009-01-28 14:26:31 +0000 UTC]
cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChromaScapes [2009-01-28 04:54:25 +0000 UTC]
Well, I don't know what a rotational is, as I'm an Apo newbie, but this is amazingly beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jolly777 [2009-01-28 01:05:24 +0000 UTC]
Magnificent
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nai8 [2009-01-26 21:23:09 +0000 UTC]
This truly is beautiful.
I'm a huge fan of rotationals, and I, in fact, learned the method of their creation through your tutorial over a year ago. This specific rotational, though, looks as if it has four separate centers, not one, which is something I hadn't really thought about much before now, and I think I may need to experiment on my own to see how one achieves such a result. It's quite effective.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Halcyon83 In reply to nai8 [2009-01-26 21:30:28 +0000 UTC]
I'm glad you noticed that this is more than just a random rotational. Rotationals are quite simple in their structure, but it takes hours and hours of tweaking to get everything right. For this piece in particular it took litterally several days to achieve this composition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Halcyon83 In reply to nai8 [2009-01-27 20:43:03 +0000 UTC]
Try playing with the curl variation on the final transform.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
magnusti78 [2009-01-25 19:56:54 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful colours!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Halcyon83 In reply to FarDareisMai [2009-01-26 10:30:21 +0000 UTC]
thanks for commenting. the composition, in my opinion, needs to be as spontaneaous as possible to keep that glowing energy sparkling. i feel that structure (or symmetry) would kill it.
glad you like the colours.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Phoenix-22 [2009-01-25 01:26:31 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful flame and a fantastic composition, but with one drawback for me at least, the quality of the image itself. You've got a lot of blurry/smudgy/blotchy spots that are probably a result of the .jpg compression. Not sure what post program you use, but I would definitely try to keep it .png throughout, even if the file size is bigger.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Halcyon83 In reply to Phoenix-22 [2009-01-25 23:32:31 +0000 UTC]
I followed your advice, which proved to be very useful. I re-rendered the image at 25k, filter radius 1.2 and 5 oversample. Postwork was done in GIMP, but I kept the .png. I agree the image looks much softer this way, so thanks for the advice. I hope you too like it better now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1