Comments: 18
Pluto1012 [2006-12-07 08:42:15 +0000 UTC]
Er ΓΎetta Gilzenegger?
π: 0 β©: 0
Nikscat [2005-10-30 04:13:52 +0000 UTC]
symmetrical would be cool, in my opinion.
π: 0 β©: 0
Solsolisdeus [2005-10-11 00:15:24 +0000 UTC]
The colors are amazing. The hair on his arms like, looks crazy lol. Great job on this one cliche or not, it's great.
π: 0 β©: 0
sfly [2005-10-09 08:47:51 +0000 UTC]
As far as technique is concerned, I like this photo. As others have already mentioned, the lighting is neat, and it does look cool how the body disappears into darkness. The pose works good, too. As for the cropping issue, I would favour the asymmetric version. It's disturbing that you can't see as much on the left as you can see on the right. But for me, that tension fits quite well here.
There's one thing though, that I have to hold against you. It's the motive. Come on, a musclebound, tanned guy with a gold chain, showing his arms and upper torso to everyone willing to gaze The cropping is different from the way everybody does it, but that does not prevent the motive from being so cliche. If the same person as in "Portrait of a woman" would have been the motive of this very shot, I guess I would have liked it, for then it would indeed have been "a different perspective". You are a very good photographer. Don't waste your talent and time for crap like that.
π: 0 β©: 0
muddpuddle [2005-09-04 14:49:08 +0000 UTC]
mm...no i dont like the crop...sorry. the way he is positioned makes it seem like asymetrical wouldfit more with the peice than the offcenterness
π: 0 β©: 0
TheHollister [2005-09-01 04:04:12 +0000 UTC]
I like the way the light hits him. It's very well done. I like it!
π: 0 β©: 0
nooru [2005-08-30 18:30:07 +0000 UTC]
vow. absolutely love it!
π: 0 β©: 0
Brazilero2002 [2005-08-30 12:16:43 +0000 UTC]
Very good tones here & I don't think it's nude shot.
π: 0 β©: 0
swingcat001 [2005-08-30 05:30:54 +0000 UTC]
That doesn't need an advisory.
I really like it. Fantastic lighting!
π: 0 β©: 0