Comments: 35
JonWes [2008-01-31 06:08:10 +0000 UTC]
Utterly fantastic!
I'll be honest, from the thumbnails I thought these were photo manips at first until I saw this one.
I'm starting up a Full color Farscape fanzine. Totally non-profit of course, but if you're ever interested in something like that let me know. I'd love to have your work in it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rykan4marius [2005-03-11 15:06:14 +0000 UTC]
YAY for progress pics!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FrameZer0 [2005-02-18 11:28:36 +0000 UTC]
COOL! GREAT WORK MAN!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CatherineBruce [2004-06-18 19:42:41 +0000 UTC]
Wow! Thanks for showing the steps. Its great to see the process something goes through to get done. I don't really apreciate the final product as much as I do when I see it being worked on. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
orcqueen [2004-04-15 21:13:39 +0000 UTC]
O_O Amazing picture! It looks so realistic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KenyruBatosai [2004-01-15 01:36:37 +0000 UTC]
Wow that's awesome. I don't believe I could put that mush effort[sp?] into something like that... I'm more of a writer.
Anyways that's really impressive! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
canebrake [2004-01-14 22:22:30 +0000 UTC]
Even seeing the steps that went into this I'm still flat out amazed. It's not a supprise.. but Still, nothing but 'wow'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Strangel [2004-01-14 21:19:31 +0000 UTC]
Huh, they still show it in my country.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Badnewsbear [2004-01-14 21:19:03 +0000 UTC]
I'm curious, what program did you use for this? Photoshop, painter? Hehe, it almost looked like 3D Studio Max. I wouldn't have known otherwise if I didn't see the line work first off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Badnewsbear In reply to herr-o [2004-01-14 21:43:58 +0000 UTC]
Wow..ouch. Haha. I'm trying my hand at realism via photoshop, though it's harder to do then ever imagine.
I'm now just wondering about techniques that you used, and other things. I seem to be having troubles when it comes to detail and skin tone. I'm more of a traditional artist, seem to have more kindness from markers and watercolor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Badnewsbear In reply to herr-o [2004-01-14 22:35:10 +0000 UTC]
Wow, those are huge resolutions. I mainly work in a 300 (3000 or so pixel) resolution, just because I'm afraid that it'll bog down the computer and such.
I just recently got a wacom tablet and have been playing around with it, but still need a good bit of practice.
Also, do you work in small areas and then move on? And what do you use to blur..and blend colors? (sorry for all of the questions.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Badnewsbear In reply to herr-o [2004-01-14 23:01:15 +0000 UTC]
Ahhh..so that's the trade off. Yeah, i'll say that I don't like to use a lot of layers unless i'm uncertain about a section..and would rather try it on a seperate layer. But that would make sense for the high reso.
So, basicly, I'm guessing, the first layer is flat color, and then you build up the layers with the different types fo detail? Like first layer - flat color, second layer - shadow, highlight (blending and the like), and then the third being mostly detail?
That would make sense to me anyway, haha.
(This might be a double post, but blame DA!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Badnewsbear In reply to herr-o [2004-01-15 03:51:46 +0000 UTC]
Ahh..alright, that makes a lot more sense! I see what you mean as far as the layers go..and wow, that's pretty simplistic (which I like when it comes to layers) and I like how you use one specific layer as a temp layer. Very nice in the ending.
And I notice, you don't end up using the original line art? That's what I always have troubles with concerning realism in photoshop, without the actual line art, I end up with a picture that looks less then par, so to say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Badnewsbear In reply to herr-o [2004-01-14 22:57:50 +0000 UTC]
Ahhh..so that's the trade off. Yeah, i'll say that I don't like to use a lot of layers unless i'm uncertain about a section..and would rather try it on a seperate layer. But that would make sense for the high reso.
So, basicly, I'm guessing, the first layer is flat color, and then you build up the layers with the different types fo detail? Like first layer - flat color, second layer - shadow, highlight (blending and the like), and then the third being mostly detail?
That would make sense to me anyway, haha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Strangel [2004-01-14 21:18:42 +0000 UTC]
I can't believe that is possible. You're genius!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ProjectDarkling [2004-01-14 21:18:00 +0000 UTC]
cool cool, love farscape... great picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MuzikQueen79 [2004-01-14 21:17:11 +0000 UTC]
Oh awesome. I miss that show.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0