Comments: 57
rainchickk [2019-07-05 22:46:24 +0000 UTC]
God, I love honey badger. I want one as a totem animal
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Redforce059 [2018-08-29 18:47:00 +0000 UTC]
Don't mess with the honey badger!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stark002 [2016-08-24 02:17:20 +0000 UTC]
i would say........RUUUUUN FOR THE HILLS!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Snakeman2013 [2016-03-16 02:20:55 +0000 UTC]
That would definitely be a contender for one of the scariest prehistoric animals to ever live.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
bhut [2016-02-29 18:47:23 +0000 UTC]
A giant honey badger? Yeah, that is really scary!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
ucumari [2016-02-28 16:19:55 +0000 UTC]
que magnifica mascota seria, te inmagina para cuidar una casa y su pariente vivo tiene la fama de ser el animal mas valiente del mundo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HodariNundu In reply to ucumari [2016-02-29 08:07:22 +0000 UTC]
hay cosas que deben permanecer indomables
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orochifanconfirmed [2016-02-27 05:28:21 +0000 UTC]
Bert! Everybody (Except that one giant crocodile living in the same area) Is gonna shit themselves LOL
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-02-27 02:27:42 +0000 UTC]
This .........is da Honey Badger. It's pretty badass.........
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Tacimur [2016-02-26 14:41:29 +0000 UTC]
The past just got 100% more badass.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2016-02-26 13:31:45 +0000 UTC]
YIKES!
WTF is wrong w/ the Miocene?
Also, RUN, MACHAIRODUS!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
randomdinos In reply to acepredator [2016-02-27 13:33:33 +0000 UTC]
It fought with all it's might to top the Cenomanian. Then the evolutionary brakes stopped working.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to randomdinos [2016-02-28 00:30:11 +0000 UTC]
At least it did top the Cenomanian.
it's ironic people consider the Mesozoic the gold standard, when the real predator pit is found much closer to our time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to acepredator [2016-02-28 00:37:48 +0000 UTC]
Now there's something to see before we die: a deviation depicting a battle between everything that's huge and bizarre, Cenomanian vs Miocene.
(You'd probably have to include sauropods to balance it out, because with predators only, it's a mismatch in favor of the Miocene.)
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to randomdinos [2016-02-28 05:25:50 +0000 UTC]
Easy. Just have the sauropods dragged into water by C. megalodon and Livyatan. (They are similar in mass)
i might actually draw that.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to acepredator [2016-02-28 11:25:52 +0000 UTC]
In shallow water a Brachiosaurus nougaredi could stomp both their heads in, though they'd have to be distracted with killing something else.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to randomdinos [2016-02-29 13:25:05 +0000 UTC]
I doubt it's easier to stomp something bigger than or the same size as yourself to death.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to acepredator [2016-02-29 14:54:55 +0000 UTC]
The sauropod outweighs the shark and cetacean combined. 40 meters and 140 tons against 18 m and 50-60 tons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to randomdinos [2016-02-29 16:53:25 +0000 UTC]
140 tons?!
That's 20 tons heavier than Amphicoelias's weight estimate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to acepredator [2016-02-29 17:06:53 +0000 UTC]
Yup, that's the maximum (it's probably a macronarian, and they're a lot heavier than diplodocids). More conservative estimates around 110-120 tons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ElSqiubbonator In reply to acepredator [2016-02-26 21:52:16 +0000 UTC]
I hereby propose we rename the Miocene the NOPE-ocene.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
acepredator In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2016-02-27 02:14:31 +0000 UTC]
That might be an understatement. NOPE-ocene is fine, but I suggest Infernalocene.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orochifanconfirmed In reply to acepredator [2016-02-27 05:20:23 +0000 UTC]
Lol tyrannocene or deinocene Orr.... ER MAH GURRDDDD EVERYTHING IS SUPERSIZED-CENE
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gytalf2000 [2016-02-26 13:30:40 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
joeabuy1000 [2016-02-26 13:28:06 +0000 UTC]
Much like its modern fun-sized kin, the honey badgers of old don't give a $#^+.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CamtheZoologist [2016-02-26 07:58:12 +0000 UTC]
Do all modern animals have a giant prehistoric relative?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
acepredator In reply to CamtheZoologist [2016-06-25 03:31:21 +0000 UTC]
More accurately, giant animals are rare today since we killed most of the modern megafauna (rip smilodon) and have had so much if an impact that replacements, which usually evolve as soon as big animals go extinct, are not evolving at all and possibly never will again.
Up until we came along, giant animals would come, go extinct, and be replaced by other giant creatures. But no more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HodariNundu In reply to CamtheZoologist [2016-02-26 08:46:59 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps it would be more correct to say that most large sized animals of prehistory have smaller cousins that managed to escape total decimation- often because of their lesser size.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tyraxxus [2016-02-26 06:49:44 +0000 UTC]
Oh my god now we got a prehistoric, freakishly large honey badger..... Machairodus, you better run!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Tarturus [2016-02-26 05:31:54 +0000 UTC]
The Machairodus should probably take the climb a tree option and call it a day.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
TheRabbitWhoHovers [2016-02-26 03:31:49 +0000 UTC]
O_____________O
Saber toothed cat, run, RUN FOR YOUR LIVE!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MythicalRaptor3 [2016-02-26 02:21:54 +0000 UTC]
Honey badger don't care, honey badger don't give a
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThalassoAtrox [2016-02-26 00:56:51 +0000 UTC]
A 50 kg honey badger? That creature would be stealing a lion prides lunches and kicking hippos back into the river.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2016-02-26 00:50:36 +0000 UTC]
METH: NOT EVEN ONCE
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Raphus-Wyvernus [2016-02-26 00:42:00 +0000 UTC]
Badger(in a crazed maniac voice): HOOOWWWWDYYYYY, THAYER!!!!!
Machairodus: WHAT ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH IS THAT???!?!!!
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
JokerCarnage5 [2016-02-26 00:32:48 +0000 UTC]
OMG! Is this for real?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GuloBorealis [2016-02-26 00:32:09 +0000 UTC]
I shall ride it into battle >8D
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
| Next =>