Comments: 16
CorazondeDios [2009-07-24 10:43:03 +0000 UTC]
yep. gun safety is paramount. my kids have known it since they were little.
the also all know how to clean guns. after you go shooting, you need to clean them.
π: 0 β©: 1
IggyHazard In reply to CorazondeDios [2009-07-24 20:54:41 +0000 UTC]
Correct. Gotta maintain their service life.
π: 0 β©: 1
CorazondeDios In reply to IggyHazard [2009-07-25 11:54:14 +0000 UTC]
happiness is a warm gun. song by the beatles -- I remember when it came out. I thought it was a weird song then, and I still do.
But back to the main point -- caring for one's possessions is important. Everything one owns is a blessing. We're lucky to live where we do under the circumstances we do. Even those in poverty level in America live waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay above the poverty level of third world countries. My daughter just returned from a volunteer stint in Africa helping school kids. Damn. Homeless people in the US are luckier than the kids there.
π: 0 β©: 1
CorazondeDios In reply to IggyHazard [2009-07-26 14:28:19 +0000 UTC]
I like the Periodic Table song, sung to the tune of Pirates of Penzance
[link]
(I am not responsible for whatever advertising prefaces this original recording)
Tom Lerher wrote and performed it. It's hilarious
Thereβs antimony, arsenic, aluminum, selenium,
And hydrogen and oxygen and nitrogen and rhenium
And nickel, neodymium, neptunium, germanium,
And iron, americium, ruthenium, uranium,
Europium, zirconium, lutetium, vanadium
And lanthanum and osmium and astatine and radium
And gold, protactinium and indium and gallium
And iodine and thorium and thulium and thallium.
Thereβs yttrium, ytterbium, actinium, rubidium
And boron, gadolinium, niobium, iridium
And strontium and silicon and silver and samarium,
And bismuth, bromine, lithium, beryllium and barium.
Thereβs holmium and helium and hafnium and erbium
And phosphorous and francium and fluorine and terbium
And manganese and mercury, molybdinum, magnesium,
Dysprosium and scandium and cerium and cesium
And lead, praseodymium, and platinum, plutonium,
Palladium, promethium, potassium, polonium,
Tantalum, technetium, titanium, tellurium,
And cadmium and calcium and chromium and curium.
Thereβs sulfur, californium and fermium, berkelium
And also mendelevium, einsteinium and nobelium
And argon, krypton, neon, radon, xenon, zinc and rhodium
And chlorine, carbon, cobalt, copper,
Tungsten, tin and sodium.
These are the only ones of which the news has come to Harvard,
And there may be many others but they havenβt been discovered.
π: 0 β©: 1
Otacon237 [2009-02-21 23:27:40 +0000 UTC]
Neat! I didn't realize there were any modern 7-shot revolvers! How good is the .357 Sig cartridge? I'm deciding which caliber my first handgun will be, thinking .45 Auto because of all the rounds I've fired it feels the most comfortable and smooth.
π: 0 β©: 1
IggyHazard In reply to Otacon237 [2009-02-21 23:51:26 +0000 UTC]
I've never used .357 SIG, but I've read nothing but positives about it. It's basically a 9mm bullet in a bottlenecked 10mm casing with enough increased powder charge to give it approximately 1.5 times the muzzle energy of 9mm Parabellum. More powerful. More accurate. More faster. More everything.
If you want a .45 Auto, you have practically limitless options. I can vouch for the excellence of SIG/Sauer and GLOCK, but there's also Colt, Kimber, Para-Ordnance, and lots of others. I've heard Kimbers aren't very g0od compared to Para-Ordnance which are top-of-the-line. Para-Ordnance, Colt, and Kimber are all pricey, though. GLOCKs are typically affordable. SIGs can vary. I've seen newer ones that are pricey and others that are in a more practical price range. I got mine for about $500. It's an early '90s P220 in American configuration (mag release on the side).
If you wanted a 9mm, you can't go wrong with an FN/Browning Hi-Power. Then again, GLOCKs are always a g0od choice regardless of caliber. Actually, that's also true for SIG/Sauer. But if you want a revolver, I'd recommend Taurus.
π: 0 β©: 1
IggyHazard In reply to Otacon237 [2009-02-22 11:21:35 +0000 UTC]
.45 GAP might take off like .40 S&W. Then again, maybe not. I'm not really sure how practical it is for a civilian since we already have access to cheaper and more prevalent caliber types.
π: 0 β©: 1
Otacon237 In reply to IggyHazard [2009-02-22 19:58:31 +0000 UTC]
This is true. According to their site it's just a .45 Auto with a slightly shorter case so it fits standard Glock grip sizes for the smaller ones, so I don't know how practical it would be in any other application.
π: 0 β©: 0
badchess [2006-11-15 03:04:18 +0000 UTC]
Big gun.
π: 0 β©: 1