Comments: 21
xue-az [2006-11-19 19:51:26 +0000 UTC]
what a shame! it's really blurry!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GangsterLovin [2005-12-11 10:35:08 +0000 UTC]
Would it be possible to actually legally own a sawed-off shotgun you converted yourself from a hunting/sporting shotgun? Would it also be possible to have the barrels at a length less than 18 or 16 inches? You're such an expert on shotguns, so you'd probably know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IggyHazard In reply to GangsterLovin [2005-12-11 18:52:45 +0000 UTC]
Expert on shotguns, yes. Expert in the law, no. I'm not positive on how it works for civilians, but police armorers can shorten barrels themselves. For a civilian, you have to have an unconstitutional license to own a short-barrel shotgun (SBS) and you must pay an unconstitutional $200 transfer tax. To legally own an any-other-weapon (AOW) type shotgun, you don't need an unconstitutional license and you must pay an unconstitutional $5 transfer tax instead of the unconsitutional $200 transfer tax you must pay for a SBS. What differentiates SBS from AOW is whether or not it comes from the factory with a stock or pistol grip. A folding stock still makes it a SBS. An AOW shotgun is legally classified as a "sm0othbore pistol" since the law defines a shotgun as a shoulder-fired weapon.
A stock is always preferrable, but unconstitutional law and its taxation/extortion monetary ally don't care about the performance or function of a firearm just as they don't care about the Nation or the People. The legalistic sycophants of mammon only care about order and control. They are as much a threat to Liberty as kamikaze terrorists, liberal traitors, internationalist bankers, the Nazi European Union, and all other enemies if Zion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ProffesuerBob [2005-10-11 17:53:23 +0000 UTC]
Hahah, nationalism. But isn't nationalizm similar to collectivism where the Gov't owns a bunch of stuff?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IggyHazard In reply to ProffesuerBob [2005-10-11 18:06:02 +0000 UTC]
That depends on the character of the nation. The US is an individualist nation. A TRUE American understands that any group or "greater whole" (nation, society, etc.) owes its existence to the individual and not the other way around like collectivists believe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProffesuerBob In reply to IggyHazard [2005-10-11 21:22:49 +0000 UTC]
Ok, so you mean American nationalizm, as opposed to that Chinese guy the U. S. supported(Chiang Kai-shek?) who had to retreat to Tiawan (then Formosa) and was overthrown not to long afterwards because people didn't like his Oligarchy thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IggyHazard In reply to ProffesuerBob [2005-10-11 22:37:58 +0000 UTC]
The Black Panthers can't lay the only claim to the clenched fist as an insignia. There are all sorts of variations of clenched fists used as symbols by various political factions all across the spectrum.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProffesuerBob In reply to IggyHazard [2005-10-12 04:55:18 +0000 UTC]
I know, but that's the first one that comes to mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IggyHazard In reply to ProffesuerBob [2005-10-12 05:02:50 +0000 UTC]
Theirs is specifically a black fist agaisnt a white background (a right fist, I think). White Power types often used a white fist against a black background. If I were to make a clenched fist insignia, the fist would be some off-color like gray (instead of black or white) and would be a left fist signifying the South (southpaw/southern fist of revolt).
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ProffesuerBob In reply to IggyHazard [2005-10-12 05:54:04 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I tottaly got the southpaw thing. Are you in the South? And if so, are you in the Deep South or the Old South?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ProffesuerBob In reply to IggyHazard [2005-10-12 05:18:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I tottaly got the southpaw thing. Are you in the South? And if so, are you in the Deep South or the Old South?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProffesuerBob In reply to IggyHazard [2005-10-12 05:56:31 +0000 UTC]
Hahha, In Louisiana we think of virginia as the north even though it's in the south.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kanmeros78 [2005-10-10 17:27:40 +0000 UTC]
it depicts greatness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0