HOME | DD

IggyHazard — Resist the EU

Published: 2005-04-20 02:17:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 963; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 49
Redirect to original
Description Down with the EU! Down with Nazism! Down with collectivism! Down with internationalism! Death to defeatism! Death to appeasement! National Revolutionary Vigilantism Uber Alles! Arise and resist with a clenched fist!

By the way, "ZOG" stands for Zionist Occupational Government. It's actually just a make-believe entity that Neo-Nazis use as an excuse to kill Jews. Armed vigilantism is the only way to get rid of Neo-Nazis. That's part of what the Second Amendment is for -- securing the Peoples' right to exterminate oppressors. The term "collectivism" applies equally to Stalinists, Hitlerists, UN/EU advocates, internationalist bankers, and authoritarian cults.

P.S.: I'm a Christian Zionist.

Update: improved with Photoshop
Related content
Comments: 40

PaliLies [2006-11-03 14:16:22 +0000 UTC]

note: please use a bold tag on the text "make believe" in your artist comments.

some less literate people might get confused and mad at the wrong people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to PaliLies [2006-11-04 00:51:08 +0000 UTC]

I'll do that now.

Note: There's no such thing as "ZOG." It's just something made up by neo-Nazis. The phrase, "Hail ZOG," is just meant to piss off neo-Nazis and other such haters of Israel. Also, there are Christian Zionists as well as Jewish Zionists.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shuja3t [2006-06-18 16:40:14 +0000 UTC]

I think morally correct Christians disagree with you. Swedish Church, Norwegian Church, Presbytarian Church, British Anglican Church, who all engage in israeli boycott. due to their immoral methods, and just plain murderous ideology.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Shuja3t [2006-06-19 02:38:46 +0000 UTC]

That matters not to me since I am none of those.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShatteredGlasses [2006-01-03 20:46:15 +0000 UTC]

I'm an internationalist. Bite me.
Seriously, you should realize that as long as that "nation" bullshit exists, we'll continually fuck each other for centuries. I'm absolutely against the destruction of cultures, languages, etc. I'm just saying that we are first world citizens.

And you're so funny. How can you be anti-nazi and anti-internationalist at the same time? And also, how can you be Christian and anti-peace at the same time? That's even more weird. Beats me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to ShatteredGlasses [2006-01-04 16:13:48 +0000 UTC]

First, you must get the idea out of your mind that all nationalism = Nazi/fascist. Internationalism is worse than a police state because it turns the whole world into a police state. As for "peace," I'm against the hippy concept of peace (which is defeatism and appeasement of one's enemies, therefore treason), not God's concept of peace (which is simply the opposite of social darwinism).

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spikmonkeyman [2005-12-21 19:35:56 +0000 UTC]

How ignorantly mindnumbingly daft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2005-12-21 19:43:04 +0000 UTC]

I take it you're pro-EU and therefore anti-Israel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2005-12-21 19:56:37 +0000 UTC]

No, i'm pro-nothing, anti-everything. But yeah, come to think of it the current state of israel is at the top of my list.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2005-12-21 20:02:06 +0000 UTC]

I notice the 666 in your avatar, the numerical name of the Roman Empire which is the Beast's seat of power. Nazi Germany was the most recent incarnation of the unholy Roman Empire. The European Union will be the final incarnation.

All who oppose mighty Israel shall perish at the hand of Christ.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2005-12-21 20:08:30 +0000 UTC]

Your people put christ to death. and now you slander the two empires that brought so much to society? without them you would all still be playing in the sand.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2005-12-21 20:16:17 +0000 UTC]

Whoa! Hold on there! You must assume I'm Jewish. I'm not, I'm an Apostolic Christian. We to0 are technically Zionists since we believe in the sovereignty of Israel. As for the idea of the Jews putting Christ to death, it wasn't all the Jews who did that, only their snivelling Roman-collaborating tyrannical ruling class, the Pharisees of the Sandhedrin.

All of the accomplishments of any empire count for nothing if that empire sets itself against God. Egypt, Babylon, and Rome are only a few examples. So many man-made structures, like the pyramids and such, are considered wonders in the modern world, but few actually think about these things being built by slave labor. Injustice and inhumanity don't go unpunished under the Lord's vengeful fist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2005-12-21 20:37:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm not (zionist), and i don't give a rats ass. I would rather regect the title of zionist and go through purgatory (cause after all i am catholic) and as for the 666 in my avatar, a mear joke. But let me point out one shocking coincidence. The mark of the beast will be a star of david. 6 lines, 6 intersections, 6 points. And the flag of your beloved Zion flies high over a land of heritics. And considering that you are chosen, you treat the rest of society as slaves, so why should you expect different treatment when you are not in a position to decide for yourself. I don't support slavery, thats not what i'm about. But if you had your way, any non-zionist would be a slave to israel. To Jarusalem. To the jew (or apostolic christian.)

Christ was sent to save all of mankind, even the skum shit (myself) that you would try and exterminate "Through God." He was not sent to save just christians and jews. Christ is present in all men (and women, just so you don't label me as a sexist.) Even if he rejects them, god is merciful, at least thats what christ preached. You read to much of the old testemant to call yourself a "Christian" He was sent to ratify what had been said before him, yet you cling to the old zionist pride spoken of in the older parts of the bible. God will smite you before me, cause i will love you even though you would deal me harm.

I pray for your soul so that you may see that Zionists are not God's sole people, but that everyman is a child of god.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2005-12-21 23:15:12 +0000 UTC]

You're not understanding me clearly. I have friends who atheists, even, yet I don't condemn them or treat them rudely. It's inhumanity and injustice that I oppose. Forgiveness is divine, yes, but so is justice. There can be no justice without retribution, otherwise what we have is animal law, social darwinism, and all the iniquities mankind is capable of. There has to be accountability that is applied equally to everyone. I hear all this talk about "war is not the answer" or that we should "forgive" or even "love" terrorists and traitors that seek our downfall. Well, call me a heretic all you want, but I support waging war not only on terrorists but also on terrorist sympathizers, collaborators, defeatists, and appeasers.

Also, I must ask this question: If you oppose slavery, why are you Catholic?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2006-01-02 21:18:37 +0000 UTC]

How do you define a terrorist SIR! Someone who uses terror as a tactic to intimidate people? Isreal has done that since its founding. So you sir are calling yourself a terrorist by supporting Isreal and the Zionist alliance? And so you should be trialed as a terrorist and expediantly put to death. THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN YOUR LAW! Isreali soldiers who murder innocent palestinians is a worse crime than the Red Scare here in the United States was. Your words make me sick.

When, Recently, Has the catholic curch enslaved people? It's zion that enslaves people. You enslave them into thinking this is God's Law, and lie to them and say that killing of innocents is justice, cause to Zion all people who do not shut up and listen to what your law says must be a terrorist and should not be granted basic human rights. If questioning a governments corrupt system is some how advocating animal law or social darwinism, i think the laws of nature better dictate the way humanity should act as opposed to your Slavedriving Warmonger Zionist ways.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2006-01-02 21:31:27 +0000 UTC]

It figures a follower of the Church of Rome would stand against Israel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2006-01-02 22:54:59 +0000 UTC]

Actually, technically the catholic church is based on israel of the past, but i don't really care much for biblical law being enacted today. Tell me, your an american i assume, why is it that you are so pro-zionist?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2006-01-03 00:18:15 +0000 UTC]

America (and most of the West) is one of the nations of spiritual Israel (which also includes the physical nation of Israel).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2006-01-03 22:00:26 +0000 UTC]

Woah, woah, woah, America is a nation of American's, Zion is puppetearing us, but it didn't used to be that way. There was once an america that was self governed instead of enslaved by zion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Spikmonkeyman [2006-01-04 16:10:02 +0000 UTC]

We're not enslaved by Zion. We're a Guardian of Zion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spikmonkeyman In reply to IggyHazard [2006-01-04 22:03:04 +0000 UTC]

If guardian was so all powerful it could protect itself. It's God's Chosen land after all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thorrific [2005-06-09 16:57:19 +0000 UTC]

One great example of the fact that "international bankers" and "zionists" are one-and-the-same is Paul Wolfowitz.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thorrific [2005-06-09 16:44:06 +0000 UTC]

Uh.... in most people's history, "international bankers" and "zionists" are basically the same thing.... like the fact that "international bankers" are the source of funding for "zionists". I think you are a little confused, but what else can I expect, since you are a self-described "christian zionist".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Thorrific [2005-06-09 17:47:29 +0000 UTC]

Neo-Nazis say that Zionists are internationalist bankers when in reality it's internationalist bankers that fund Nazi/fascist institutions like the EU. Basically, it's double-speak. Real Zionists are Jewish and Christian Patriots who believe in the national sovereignty of Israel. The nation of Israel is really only one tribe of Israel. The US is actually part of the greater spiritual nation of Israel. Internationalist bankers are worshippers of mammon, collaborating with the forces of global government like the EU which seeks to ressurrect the unholy Roman Empire.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hellwithin8024 [2005-05-24 02:56:47 +0000 UTC]

damn nazis

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Reizend-Unsegen [2005-05-24 01:45:30 +0000 UTC]

eh..............................

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to Reizend-Unsegen [2005-05-24 01:47:14 +0000 UTC]

Hey, you're not obligated to like ALL my stuph. You're not even obligated to agree with my politics of do0m!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Reizend-Unsegen In reply to IggyHazard [2005-05-24 02:26:11 +0000 UTC]

lol I know...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RedimusPrime [2005-05-24 00:00:11 +0000 UTC]

i dont quite see the link between nazis and the UN, and you seem to be sending a lot of mixed messages

also allowing anybody to own a gun for no good reason can never be a good thing. In this country (UK) the BNP (British National Party) is a bunch of racist facists, and they allso want everybody to have a gun... strange how nobody votes for them....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to RedimusPrime [2005-05-24 00:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Fascists usually believe in gun control. They probably want everyone to become agents of the state. Fascists believe only agents of the state should have guns, whereas in the US, the People -- CITIZENS -- have guns. Or at least, that's how it SHOULD be, Constitutionally speaking. We have waaay to0 many repressive unjust unconstitutional laws limiting what types of firearms we can have.

The UN is a cabal of dictatorships that hates Israel. Likewise with the EU. My messages are clear. I'm pro-USA, pro-Israel, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-self defense, pro-national defense, anti-political correctness, anti-commy, anti-Nazi, anti-collectivist, anti-internationalist, anti-peace, anti-order, and anti-oppression.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedimusPrime In reply to IggyHazard [2005-05-24 04:35:56 +0000 UTC]

im afraind i disagree with a few of ur opinions then... i mean, anti-peace... why would you prefere war to peace... and im afraid im no fan of the US, especilly with it's current political reigem...

Im not the biggest fan of the EU, but it isnt facist... and the UN was set up with the direct perpuse of avoiding another situation like nazi germany...

the US and UK were wrong to start the war in Iraq too

and gun control is vital... in america it's all too easy for mental cases to get hold of guns... why do you think you have so many high school gun massakers.. eh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

gthprince In reply to RedimusPrime [2006-05-26 00:18:21 +0000 UTC]

The reason to be anti-peace is ... because during war you use propaganda to get the citizens behind the war, with that the people spend more money for the "War effort"(via just buying stuff normally + donations and MANY other things), The more money spent raises the econemy, a rise in the econemy means there is more money for war, and then the cycle continues.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IggyHazard In reply to RedimusPrime [2005-05-24 16:12:13 +0000 UTC]

The UN is no longer the League of Nations. It has become the opposite of what it was intended to be. And the EU WILL become the vanguard of the most oppressive empire in history -- the final incarnation of the unholy Roman Empire. The pope will be its religious leader and will be the power behind the fourth and final antichrist.

As for nutcases getting guns, they usually steal them. There are already laws that prevent people with mentally unstable histories from buying guns, but that can't stop them from stealing them. However, if you disarm EVERYONE, you leave them vulnerable to attack from rapists, muggers, and all manner of assorted thuggery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedimusPrime In reply to IggyHazard [2005-05-24 18:58:08 +0000 UTC]

IggyHazard said
'As for nutcases getting guns, they usually steal them. There are already laws that prevent people with mentally unstable histories from buying guns, but that can't stop them from stealing them. However, if you disarm EVERYONE, you leave them vulnerable to attack from rapists, muggers, and all manner of assorted thuggery.'

So thats why the US has some of the worst crime figures in the world... u lot have hundreds of murders a year, where as the uk generally has less than 10 a year.... and a gun is only good for protecting urself when u have the gun on your person... a good mugger/rapist/thug can happily get to the gun firstm and then, if you excuse my french, you're fucked....

and anybody who thinks the EU is some kinda religious thing and the pope will take control is plain crazy.. in europe religion is (quite rightly in my opinion) diying a death, whereas the US is full of relious nuts and ctholics killing abortion doctors... if the pope is gonna take anywhere over.. it's ur (so called) fair country... come on.. whcih country is using religion as an excuse for every war ever at the moment... i beleive thats the US...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to RedimusPrime [2005-05-24 19:32:03 +0000 UTC]

Well, maybe if baby-killers would stop murdering babies they wouldn't receive terminal judgment.

Crime in our nation is a result of a breakdown of the family. Today's subjective morality just makes it worse. Add to that dog-eat-dog competition and a drive for perfection and you have a recipe for disaster for our Republic. Competition and perfectionism are ideals that betray our Founding Fathers.

And it's ridiculous to think that an enemy will always get your gun before you do. You DO make a g0od point that people should ALWAYS have a gun on on them at ALL times. But if you ask me, we shouldn't be limited to handguns and we shouldn't have to carry concealed. Battle rifles, short-barrel shotguns (entry guns), and submachine guns are much more reasonable weapons. Handguns are strictly sidearms.

And now I will make fun of your dislogic. Guns cause crime like flies cause garbage. That's right! Garbage is actually spawned from flies! Oh, and guns have minds of their own just like SUVs, cellphone towers, lawn mowers, and toasters! Okay, now I'm getting carried away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedimusPrime In reply to IggyHazard [2005-05-24 20:05:52 +0000 UTC]

lol.. well i think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one... cause there's no way im ever gonna beleive that giving everybody a pistol, letalone all those other guns you mentioned, is a good idea... and i doubt id be able to change ur opinion either...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtFreek [2005-05-23 22:56:39 +0000 UTC]

ooh, funky

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FluffyBlueAlien626 [2005-04-20 05:30:38 +0000 UTC]

I don't like collectivism, either. We do agree on some things.

What do you think of free trade, specifically? I don't mean NAFTA, because it's a bunch of BS; but do you despise the concept of free trade?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IggyHazard In reply to FluffyBlueAlien626 [2005-04-21 01:52:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm for free trade, but not globalism. Globalism threatens our national sovereignty. There's nothing wrong with importing, exporting, and sharing g0ods and services with other nations. That's a form of symbiosis. What I'm against is supporting the economies of enemy nations such as China. All products made by Chi-Com slave labor should be boycotted. In fact, we should have the CIA infiltrate China, arm and train an underground resistance movement, and strike down the velvet-gloved iron-handed communist state that's held its people in a grip of fear and oppression for so long. We should do that to all tyrannical nations. We have the means. All we need is the will. Some people have that will, but we must mobilize more people toward that cause. The United States is the monkey wrench in the machine of the world. As long as we are the #1 superpower, tyranny will be kept at bay. Our greatest threat comes from the enemies within -- those who would sell out our national sovereignty to the highest bidder oversees (most likely to some suit-wearing bureaucrats in the UN or the EU).

Free trade is not free if it is not also fair. Over-regulation, though, does not makes things fair. It just makes things more complicated. Businesses should be kept in line by threat of force from armed Peoples' Militias. The government shouldn't even have to intervene in the first place. If an employer turns out to be an exploiter, it should be dragged out in the street and shot. If I had my way, anyone wearing a tie would be thrown up against a wall and executed. Death to all internationalist bankers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyBlueAlien626 In reply to IggyHazard [2005-04-21 02:06:55 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, okay. I see what you mean, and I agree with you to some extent. I agree that the government shouldn't get involved. It angers me that whenever I buy something from the US, the government up here has to collect their share.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0