Comments: 33
SOLARTS [2008-02-26 02:13:41 +0000 UTC]
Ok. So 1) Space = 3. 2) Time = 1.
This is the basic proposition of all of science and physics after Einstein. 1) Space (all three dimensions) are "transcendental" (it is above, around, outside of us). 2) Time is "exisential" as it adds a dimension of experience, or existence.
However time as a linear expression is nothing but an experience. We experience linear time, but certain atoms may not. Time may not "exist" as its own dimension, and neither might space. Rather than two which makes four there may be just two different dimensions: movement/light. Because light (or sound-waves, or smell-particles and so on) take "time" to reach us when moving, what we experience is already "behind" in time (whatwe experience has already happened - we only see the image of it).
Hence, time is barrier to "experience" itself. To travel faster than light would be to go faster than "human" experience, and therefore allow youto reach a destination before your "image" reached that destination (and thus to "time" travel). Time-travel is a matter of fooling someone into thinking you time travelled, not actually time travelling, if you get my meaning.
For us, in terms of fifth/sixth and seventh dimensions. 1) Something must allow for time and space to co-exist, and give energy/movement to things. Lets call this the fifth dimension. 2) Then something must permeate the three, a kind of emptiness between them, which is its own thing, and this is the sixth-dimension (two pairs of three). 3) The seventh-dimension would then be a point in that emptiness in which the space/time/energy would be as one thing (not separate as we experience it now). This would allow for a kind of "time-watching" as you put it.
Hmmmm....
Interesting, no?
The team at Solar
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IreneAdler [2007-12-12 09:11:06 +0000 UTC]
I found this very interesting. I am currently engaged in a creative project about time-travel, and your essay was most useful. Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jptso64 [2007-07-12 00:13:51 +0000 UTC]
I found your theory funny at the end. It is very interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jptso64 [2007-07-12 00:13:51 +0000 UTC]
I found your theory funny at the end. It is very interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SpinningBackwards [2006-08-27 21:49:19 +0000 UTC]
Hhmm... Thought provoking. And the dots. Now are the dots part of the line, are they the line?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ilikeorange In reply to wilaasq [2006-08-22 13:53:52 +0000 UTC]
no...what doth the animorphs have anything to do with time travel? They turn into animals don't they?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ilikeorange In reply to wilaasq [2006-08-24 10:51:24 +0000 UTC]
....yes...*ignores*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JessaMar [2006-08-18 03:04:54 +0000 UTC]
Cool... I love time travel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kitten957 [2006-08-13 23:34:45 +0000 UTC]
This is well written. I wish I was smart enough to understand it all XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kitten957 In reply to ilikeorange [2006-08-14 14:54:53 +0000 UTC]
You're awesome. I wish I could make comments or explainations half as good as you. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kitten957 In reply to ilikeorange [2006-08-15 14:13:11 +0000 UTC]
I hate classes like those. I only have classes I want for my last year XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lianaigreentea [2006-08-12 15:42:49 +0000 UTC]
That was really interesting! It definitely made me think, since I had never thought of time travel in relation to dimensions.
Small thing: "So many questions asked about one extremely seemingly simple concept – moving through time."
Drop "extremely" in this sentence, since it's redundant.
You put a lot of thought into this piece, and who knows what the future holds, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
your-reject [2006-08-12 14:06:07 +0000 UTC]
Wow... I can truthfully say I've never read anything like that, but it was quite interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2