HOME | DD

cameraflou In reply to undefinedreference [2012-09-18 15:45:24 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you, film are expensive.
However photographed with the film it's a real pleasure when you will learn to know its chemistry, its reactions, when you see the negative under a enlarger in the red darkroom or on a light table...
Besides, what's funny is that digital cameras trying to reproduce the effects obtained with analogfilm ....
there is also this little pleasure to discover shortly after that we took a picture ... Whereas with the digital photograph you shot a scene, you control, you do it again and you ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

undefinedreference In reply to cameraflou [2012-09-18 17:18:12 +0000 UTC]

I never got beyond "shooting pictures" myself. Preferably in a trance-like semi-manic state, which made it expensive. I do agree with the effects issue, I'm afraid that things like scratching and "grunge" and ageing will look horribly tacky and dated 10-15 years from now, and in a way are a denial of the essence of digital photography. Not that I could tell what that essence is exactly..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

incolorwetrust In reply to undefinedreference [2012-09-17 16:23:04 +0000 UTC]

...but nothing compares with owning an analogue camera.
if one tries not to be a consumer, but a pro who really masters the camera not just uses it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

undefinedreference In reply to incolorwetrust [2012-09-18 15:58:02 +0000 UTC]

You obviously do..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cameraflou In reply to incolorwetrust [2012-09-18 15:46:22 +0000 UTC]

Brillant color here, wich film did you used ??? or is it digital ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0