HOME | DD

IreneLangholm — Che Guevara

Published: 2008-12-28 16:38:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 10147; Favourites: 167; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Acrylics.
Ca. 50 x 60 cm.


www.theminorityreportblog.com/…
Related content
Comments: 202

ChaoticPyro [2013-06-18 18:21:51 +0000 UTC]

Capitalism works, but requires morality to temper its dark side. Capitalism without morality leads us pretty much where we are now, which is the beginnings of aristocracy and feudalism.

Marxism, while pretty on paper, never has worked and never will because it forgets human nature. People are motivated by self interest, and when working hard and putting in the bare minimums both have the same reward, nobody works.

What we need is a system that rewards the worker, and right now, neither the status quo (Crony Capitalism) nor Marxism as practiced by any historical group fits the bill.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Emperor-sama In reply to ChaoticPyro [2013-06-29 04:41:22 +0000 UTC]

Communism has had to evolve over the years since Marx. It's impossible to eradicate government because every society requires order and the world runs on money.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MarkSongBird [2013-06-14 19:37:02 +0000 UTC]

Murderer!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to MarkSongBird [2013-06-16 20:47:13 +0000 UTC]

Nope, I'm just a painter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sistheo [2012-01-13 15:21:53 +0000 UTC]

this macho shit really enjoyed executing people by blowing their heads off - still, he got his. Vote for Jesus - fkk left & right-wing fascists

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-13 16:49:52 +0000 UTC]

Jesus! Now there's a guy with a taste for violence! Che could never outdo the damage on the scale of what he/God did. If you go for that trinity thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-13 21:50:18 +0000 UTC]

Christ had violence inflicted on Himself to defeat death. He - and those in Him - never hurt anyone PS the Most Holy Trinity is three hypostaseis resting on one PERFECT MAN - things ain't got nothing to do with INCREATE LIGHT

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-13 23:30:10 +0000 UTC]

There is no character in history who has (according to the bible myth) murdered as many people as your beloved God.

Cheers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-13 23:59:15 +0000 UTC]

Contradiction - how can a mythical entity murder anyone? And if Christ is God, He killed no-one. Girls should never allow the uterus to over-rule the brain. Heaven is my country - it saves & earth slaughters. God bless

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-14 10:15:28 +0000 UTC]

You ask me? It's in the bible. I thought you believed in the bible. God commanded the destruction of cities containing innocent children, women and men.
What the fuck does the uterus got to do with it, you're talking so much nonsense. I prefer to use my brain more than my uterus, thank you very much. God wants us to be whores, is that what you're saying? Because that's what it sounds like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-14 10:51:11 +0000 UTC]

To understand the Tanakh/OT you'd require some Akkadian/Babylonian Hebrew & Arabic & Greek - talk to my boss cuz he does. Fkk the Bible as history, it's largely a compilation by dozens of uneven minds - however, it is a manual of deification/divinization or the means of access to divinity. When you fell from Heaven, brain-damage/soul-damage ensued so I'm sure lotsa things sound nonsensical to you. Of course God forbid He doesn't want the sisterhood as whores, only as restored goddesses. Men in the Bible saw God as responsible for destruction but it ain't necessarily so ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-16 00:07:52 +0000 UTC]

Talk to you boss? Who, God?

The bible is a collection of myths. Nothing more, nothing less.
Plus goddesses would define a polytheistic faith which I'm sure is blasphemy according to your bible.

Who has the brain damage? My bet is on you. Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-16 07:09:37 +0000 UTC]

You are merely a pawn in Satan's hideous game - alas, profoundly ignorant. Christ aka God Almighty fkks over the Pharisees in the Gospel of John X:34-35 by saying I SAY YE ARE GODS thus quoting the Psalm of Asaph 81 or 82 depending on which Bible is used. This Psalm talks of the revolt in Heaven when the ELOHIM revolted against God. Elohim in Hebrew is theoi in Greek = gods. This is not polytheism or simplistic monotheism but a far more accurate & dynamic Trinitarian theology.

My boss/employer is Jim Overbeck [see godalmighty.co.uk] a handsome fkker isn't he? Obviously the Lord God Jesus of Nazareth is his boss & mine. I'm starting to put Journal articles in place so silly little arses like you can learn. More will follow, so do try reading them. PS I have wandered around Meso-America whilst writing a university thesis - which is why I'm dottoresse & you're not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-16 14:27:05 +0000 UTC]

Satan is a fairy tale. Grow up.

Even if it wasn't, I'd rather support Satan than the hideousness of God. He sounds like a real asshole. God have done all the murdering, not Satan. What a paradox.

Polytheism = faith in several gods. Goddesses = plural.

No one will follow you because you obviously lack sanity and an ability to reason.
Cheers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-13 16:46:51 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-13 21:57:21 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-13 23:28:26 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-13 23:56:28 +0000 UTC]

Read my Journal - it's hardly incoherent

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-14 10:17:37 +0000 UTC]

It is extremely incoherent. That's probably why anyone hasn't commented either.
Besides, why would I care about your journal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-14 10:44:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure you'd read Ezra Pound's Cantos or J Joyce's Ulysses and say advanced literature there is incoherent also. For fkk's sake I'm a bitch of the sisterhood who studied Latin Portugese French Spanish Italian & Arabic & I'm fluent as a dottore in several. Arseholes don't comment because it's beyond them, just as they find my boss's books in Greek German Arabic & Hebrew beyond them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-16 00:04:48 +0000 UTC]

Bitch of the sisterhood. That's nice. Is that some kind of cult?

Just because you've read a few books that others may have not doesn't mean that you are superior to them. It's like me saying I'm superior to you because I can use punctuation better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sistheo In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-16 07:40:21 +0000 UTC]

I study Arabic grammar most days & my boss has a beautiful boyfriend who is a professore di grammatica, so we do not feel the need to harness ourselves into tedious conventional structures all the time - savvy, Irene? Read a few books? - the library we have available is probably one of the finest in Italy & in all probability my education is far superior to yours: still don't feel put down because you can always dress as a freak or whatever it is impudent zombies do PS intelligent lesbian girls should form a sisterhood - you can join as a probationary member as long as you join at the bottom [my bottom]. I hope you like the pic of me in my leather mini-skirt cuz I'm liable to boss my bitches about - note our whip also cuz you will have to kiss it to cum. See the finger, feel the finger PPS I'm nice really but take no shit from anyone ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Sistheo [2012-01-16 14:23:32 +0000 UTC]

Sure, hehe. Sure.
Still no need to brag about reading a couple of pseudo-intellectual books. Obviously you are not superior to me if you feel the need to say it. And you don't know anything about my education so apparently you are just making things up. Or you're just bad at making conclusions.

See my middle finger, feel my middle finger.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quadraro In reply to IreneLangholm [2012-01-25 19:16:11 +0000 UTC]

can you tell this little fascist to shaving her armpits? disgusting...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Quadraro [2012-01-26 10:26:32 +0000 UTC]

I don't know her and I don't care.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VultrazT-99 [2010-07-06 17:09:50 +0000 UTC]

HOO YEAH!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to VultrazT-99 [2010-07-06 19:13:09 +0000 UTC]

I guess I should say thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Art-Terrorist [2009-09-10 12:16:44 +0000 UTC]

I just don't understand the Che worship.

He turned Cuba into a cesspit of despair and oppression.
Life is so bad in Che's Marxist Paradise. People to this day are risking their very lives by trying to escape in homemade boats.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Art-Terrorist [2009-09-10 17:51:44 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-Terrorist In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-09-10 22:24:07 +0000 UTC]

Things in Cuba are much worse now because of Che.
The people of Cuba were promised freedom. Instead they were given more chains to wear.
Nelson Mandela belonged to an organization that burned policemen alive. So I don't have a high opinion of him either.
There are people that look up to to Joesph Stalin and Adolf Hitler.
So why not El Che as well?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Art-Terrorist [2009-09-10 22:29:19 +0000 UTC]

US propaganda. Everyone's a terrorist. Even Mother Theresa.
And you elected a terrorists for president twice! How about that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-Terrorist In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-09-10 22:39:09 +0000 UTC]

US Propaganda?

I work with people that have escaped from Cuba, do you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Art-Terrorist [2009-09-10 22:58:39 +0000 UTC]

I don't need to do that to understand that many Cubans that view Che as a hero and a liberator. And a man driven by moral instead of materialism and power. But I also understand that other think the opposite, as I've mentioned before.
The man died over 40 years ago. Are people still escaping from Guevara..? Noone's running the place the present time?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-Terrorist In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-09-10 23:14:45 +0000 UTC]

They are escaping the Communist paradise (dictatorship) that Che was instrumental in creating.
The Cubans who think Che is a hero are probably the people that didn't have their
families executed so that the new government could seize their property.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AtheosEmanon In reply to Art-Terrorist [2010-10-09 14:45:34 +0000 UTC]

That too I would have to say comrade is US propaganda. We tried to do everything to discredit him, it did not work, we tried to overthrow Castro, that did not work. While the Powers that be may dislike him, the people deeply love and respect him.

Funny how everyone who fights for the people the US hated.

We can look at Malcolm X, who actually met with Castro, US hated X.
We can look at Gandhi, a man who urged peaceful resistance, yet in the states he was referred to as a terrorist.

Nelson Mandela, another man who fought for the people, who met with Castro, ... America did not take Mandela off of the terrorist list officially until 2008.

..anyone that fights for the people and against the elite will always have the hatred of the minorities, the elites, yet will always have the love of the masses.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nameda [2009-07-06 23:31:06 +0000 UTC]

yep looks quite like the Original from Jim Fitzpatrick one of my fave artists

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Nameda [2009-07-11 09:43:49 +0000 UTC]

I'd say the original came from Alberto Korda on which everyone is basing that famous iconic image of Guevara.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nameda In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-07-11 13:08:29 +0000 UTC]

[link]
I know this artist for years

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Nameda [2009-07-11 18:35:52 +0000 UTC]

Sure, but the photograph still came first: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nameda In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-07-11 21:27:37 +0000 UTC]

thats true, I thought you where talking
of the more famous painting

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Nameda [2009-07-12 12:24:03 +0000 UTC]

To be honest, I don't find the painting all that impressive. It looks like a 2 minute posterizing job in Photoshop.

So all my credit goes to Korda.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nameda In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-07-12 16:46:33 +0000 UTC]

matter of taste

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to Nameda [2009-07-12 23:46:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WoW-Sky [2009-06-13 16:26:47 +0000 UTC]

beautiful painting honey well done

I think Che Guevara was an icon inspiration for many people in this world

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to WoW-Sky [2009-06-13 17:09:12 +0000 UTC]

Indeed he was. Thank you so much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WoW-Sky In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-06-13 18:03:21 +0000 UTC]

most welcome honey keep up the good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

XxaddictionxX [2009-06-04 06:23:51 +0000 UTC]

Thats very nice. I cant handle paint it always runs down the canvas or the colours are mixed up. Thats why i like to draw.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to XxaddictionxX [2009-06-04 11:33:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.
Well, acrylic paint doesn't run because you don't have to use much or any water at all. But I do find painting more difficult than drawing because I don't feel like have the same control with a brush.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XxaddictionxX In reply to IreneLangholm [2009-06-05 08:49:06 +0000 UTC]

yeah. id like to learn to use different methods like painting and stuff. but too much work right now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneLangholm In reply to XxaddictionxX [2009-06-05 16:13:16 +0000 UTC]

You should definitely try Acrylics sometime. It's the easiest paint to work with.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>