HOME | DD

ironroad — Pratt Power

#f14a #japan #navy #tomcat #unitedstatesnavy #usn #vf154 #prattwhitney #aim54 #gbu12 #tf30 #nafatsugi #atsugi #blackknights #missile #phoenix #f14tomcat #navalaviation
Published: 2015-03-31 10:50:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 1319; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description A F-14A Tomcat from VF-154 Taking off in full afterburner.

The Grumman F-14 Tomcat was initially fielded with the TF30-P-414A turbofan engine as the F-14A. This engine was carried-over from the US Navy's failed F-111B project. The F-14 had a troublesome history with the the TF-30 engine. The aircraft was severely underpowered and had lacked the thrust to weight ratio of its contemporaries such as the US Air Force's F-15 Eagle. Furthermore, TF30 was found to be ill-adapted to the demands of air combat and was prone to compressor stalls at high angle of attack (AOA) if the throttles were moved aggressively. Because of the Tomcat's widely spaced engine nacelles, compressor stalls at high AOA were especially dangerous because they tended to produce asymmetric thrust that could send the Tomcat into an upright or inverted spin, from which recovery was very difficult.

The F-14's engine problems were later corrected with the F-14B (or F-14A+) and the F-14D. Both variants were built and engined (or rebuilt from F-14A models) with the more powerful General Electric F110 turbofan engine, which gave the F-14 a thrust to weight ratio of 1:1. However, due to production cost and budget cuts many US Navy squadrons flew F-14s with the original TF30 engines, until the aircraft was replaced by the F-18 Hornet. Most notably, VF-154 and VF-211 both flew TF30 engined tomcats from the late 1970s/early 1980s until their F-14s were removed from service in the early 2000s.


*The variants of the TF30 were also used in the US Navy's A-7 Corsair II attack aircraft, and the US Airforce's (and Royal Australian Air Force) F-111 long-range medium attack bomber.

Related content
Comments: 13

Aquila200 [2018-09-09 13:06:11 +0000 UTC]

Great capture! The heat blur and vapor effects have come our beautifully, and I love the richness of the colour overall.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ironroad In reply to Aquila200 [2018-11-25 20:50:58 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aquila200 In reply to ironroad [2018-11-26 16:36:42 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Scooter160 [2015-08-08 18:29:25 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful digital image of her.  Digital art brings out color that actual photos often lack.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NavJAG [2015-07-08 01:24:40 +0000 UTC]

It's really a shame it took so long to get decent engines into the F-14, and by the time we did, we didn't operate the Tomcat much longer and wouldn't pay to upgrade the majority of them.  

Nice work on this - your heat blur and vapor effects look great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ironroad In reply to NavJAG [2015-07-10 00:15:17 +0000 UTC]

There were not to many F-14Ds (only about three operational squadrons VF-2, VF-31, and VF-213 and two training squadrons VF-124 and VF-101) But the F-14A+ (B) came into full force in the late 1980s and early 1990s.  Most the Bs went to East Coast squadrons and a lot of the original As were phased out after the Persian Gulf war. The F-14 had a long and disgusted career, even the upgraded engine F-14B and D became very costly and labor intensive.  I always favored the B's (VF-32 was my favorite squadron) and am thankful I had the opportunity to see the F-14 fly on many occasions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NavJAG In reply to ironroad [2015-07-11 10:05:08 +0000 UTC]

Cool.  I did a deployment with USS NIMITZ carrier strike group in 2007 and 2008.  Of course all of the F-14s were gone by 2006.  NIMITZ didn't deploy with F-14s in 2005 either.  I wish I got to see the F-14 fly; all the fighters during my two deployments were versions of the F/A-18.  At least the EA-6B was still flying; they are pretty much gone from the Navy now.  The F-35C is supposed to be in the fleet in the next few years or so - we'll see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ironroad In reply to NavJAG [2015-07-12 05:26:36 +0000 UTC]

They just retired the Prowler from Navy service
www.navy.mil/submit/display.as…

I believe the Marine Corps still have a squadron or two left.

Thanks for your service btw. I'm pretty sure you have gotten to see and do things up-close that most people (including myself) have only dreamed about.

Best of luck!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Scooter160 In reply to ironroad [2015-08-08 18:30:31 +0000 UTC]

I am a Navy vet ten years of service.  I worked on the A-6 Intruder before moving on to be a Navy Instructor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ironroad In reply to Scooter160 [2015-08-10 00:53:48 +0000 UTC]

I also love the Intruder, those jokers were ear piercingly loud. The F-14 you could "feel" while the A-6 would dang near pop your ear drums. Grumman Aerospace, some of the toughest and finest aircraft in the U.S./NATO inventory were produced by them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scooter160 In reply to ironroad [2015-08-10 01:09:37 +0000 UTC]

They were rightfully called Grumman Iron.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NavJAG In reply to ironroad [2015-07-12 11:40:13 +0000 UTC]

The Marine Corps will continue to fly the Prowler for a while - they are not buying the EA-18 Growler.  Not sure what they will do when the Prowlers are too old.

Thanks - I retired from the Navy last year after 22 years of active duty.  It was great to serve, but I'm glad to be settled down now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ironroad [2015-03-31 11:05:05 +0000 UTC]

I had to do some minor editing and touching up using GIMP, mainly to get the heat blur and vapor effects I wanted. The background airfield is supposed to represent NAF Atsugi Japan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0