HOME | DD
ISHAWEE β Harambe
#ape #gorilla #monkey #silverback #harambe
Published: 2016-06-15 11:21:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 2206; Favourites: 94; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Like most of you, I'm totally outraged about this story. A magnificent animal loses its life because of human stupidity. The death of Harambe was TOTALLY SENSELESS because there was no direct threat to the kid's life. It's only that people tend to freak out when it comes to kids. Harambe could have been put to sleep easily, he had no intention of hurting the boy. If he wanted to, he could have snapped his neck in seconds.And, best of all, parents will not be charged! I would have charged them with paying tremendous amounts of money to some gorilla conservation centers. A beautiful animal is dead because of some dumb parents and some dumb brat. A life is lost. And why? Only because the child might have ended up with a couple of bruises?Β
Related content
Comments: 36
π: 0 β©: 0
I thank you for respecting his death/He was great ape/He didn't have to die like this./The memes are disrespectful across the internet./Thank you again for making a good picture of him.
π: 0 β©: 0
Β This dude took better care of the kid than his parents...
π: 0 β©: 0
At least he's in heaven doing drive by's in the forestΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Makes me want the catch some 17 year old football player, drive him to a public pool, take his struggling self to the kiddie pool, and then start dragging him around in 3' of water.
When he gets bloody and dinged up, and the cops show up and arrest me, maybe then the world will understand why they shot what was essentially a 440 pound retard slinging a kid around.
π: 0 β©: 3
Dick's out for any reason is stupid, and even stupider if they are out for remembrance of an animal. Shove a carrot up your ass for Mr. Ed while your at it! lol
Anyhow, see the afore answered statements for validation of your own quarry.
π: 0 β©: 0
what's the point of your comment? Are you comparing a wild animal (and an endangered species) to a crime offender?
π: 0 β©: 1
No, I'm just saying that certain situation's have an appropriate response, ask Jane Goodall.
π: 0 β©: 1
So I can avoid any pedophilia related rebuttal's, while still unfairly assaulting a kid.
π: 0 β©: 0
You are a fucking retard.
I wish you were the kid the gorrila swung around.
It was the parents fault for not watching him.
I hope you die.
π: 0 β©: 1
And the gorilla needed to die or the kid was going too.
π: 0 β©: 0
omgΒ
this is actually great dud gjΒ Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
The Animal Sorrounded By Bad Company, Thinking The Animal Was The Bad Company
π: 0 β©: 0
I was outrageous too! BUILD HIGHER FENCES!
The only problem was they knew that tranquilizing would take 15 minutes. And you don't want to peek a needle with a gun into a Gorilla when you don't know how he will react to pain in that situation.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well I can imagine being shot with a bullet provokes even more pain than a tiny needle. So the risk of the gorilla getting angry with pain was even bigger in the first case... The animal was peaceful. I can't understand of shooting it 'just in case'... I would risk a kid breaking an arm knowing it could save another being's life.
π: 0 β©: 2
The kid was in danger.Β
I am outraged too but at least I know that a child's life is worth more than an animals life.Β
Have you not seen the video?
That was a display of aggression. Dragging the child in the water and lifting him up?Β
"I would risk a kid breaking an arm"
The child has also suffered enough injuries from his fall and you rather him risk getting killed or breaking an arm over a gorilla? What world do you live in?
Uh so you rather have the kid in danger because you "could save another life"
Life isn't a disney fairy tale and that is a child in the enclosure of a WILD animal.Β
The parents should have been watching the child and maybe this could all be avoided,but do not get angry at the fact the animal "could have been saved if tranquilized and enraged even more"; yes the tranquizer would have done more harm than good and the child would have been killed and it would have taken 15 or more minutes to kick in. The only option they had was to shoot and kill. I hate to break it to you but the child's safety comes first and that is how our world works.
Be enraged over poor parenting because that is what caused this.
Also this isn't the first time this has happened.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
NO, it wasn't a display of aggression. The gorilla WASN'T being aggressive. That's the way gorillas play with their offspring. If the gorilla had wanted to kill the kid, he would have done it right away, like smashing it against the wall or tearing it to pieces. That's how aggression works, it's violent and sudden, it does not take time to stop and think and act confused.
If the gorilla had jumped roaring and smashing the kid against the floor, I'd be the first one to shoot it. The problem is, it wasn't violent at all. There was a just a possibility of a kid getting injured by how playful/confused the animal was acting. And that for me is too little to take its life away, "just in case".
π: 0 β©: 2
m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/102088β¦
Please educate yourself.
π: 0 β©: 0
Are you a gorilla expert? Male Silverback kill offspring that aren't there's. What he was doing was taunting. The experts said it themselves.
π: 0 β©: 1
Are YOU a gorilla expert?
Well it seems it all depends on the articles you read then, so let's leave it this way. Also, "theirs". Please correct spelling mistakes beofre telling others to "please educate themselves", makes it look funny.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am no Gorilla expert but I do my research instead of assuming wild animals are just like the ones in Disney films.Β
Ah; the old grammar nazi trick. Typos are bound to happen if you're typing on a phone because of auto correct; no need to be so asshurt over the fact someone is correcting you on your silliness. The Gorilla was not protecting the child. If that child was not in danger, things would have gone differently. The real culprit here is the shitty mom who wasn't watching her kid. On-lookers saw the child trying to climb the fence several times and shouted at the mother but she didn't care or pay any attention. Β If she was a more attentive parent; Harambe would have still been alive.Β
π: 0 β©: 2
Animals don't do half the terrible things humans do.
The child wasn't going to die,
they could have tranquilized Harambe.
π: 0 β©: 1
Um what?Β
Okay Gorilla expert, tell me how the child wasn't in danger and that the tranquilizer would have worked right away when the zoo officials themselves (people who know these animals inside and out) said Harambe was displaying dominant behavior and that the tranquilzier would have only agitated him even more and taken several minutes to take effect.
π: 0 β©: 0
sure, but why assume that if somebody doesn't share your point of view that means they're ignorant, don't do any research and think wild animals are like Disney film characters? That's ridiculizing your discussion opponent, isn't it?Β
I read tons of articles, some of them stating the gorilla was aggressive, some stating it was playful. And having read those articles and watched the video, I came to the conclusion I don't see it being aggressive. Especially that the kid wasn't gored right away, beause as I said, agression in wild animals is violent and sudden, and comes as a response to a direct threat - come to think of that, do you think a giant gorilla could have felt threatened by a little human kid..? If an animal is aggressive with no apparent reason then it has some mental problems. You can agree, but you can also have your own opinion and I respect that. I'm just sick of people shooting animals dead "just in case" while you can use some tranquilizers, which, in my opinion, should have been used especially on critically endangered species. But again, just my opinion, you're welcome to disagree.
I also find it sickening that the parents haven't been charged for that.Β
I'm not a grammar nazi, but telling people to educate themselves while making some basic spelling mistakes makes it look quite ridiculous, you gotta admit that
π: 0 β©: 1
It's like you didn't even read the creditable article I linked you. If the child was not in danger Harambe wouldn't have been shot.Β
"if an animal is aggressive for no apparent reason then it has mental problem"??
Gorillas are naturally territorial and males tend to kill offspring that aren't theirs.
So I guess they are mentally ill even though thats in their nature; right?
You want to believe soooo hard that wild animals aren't dangerous or violent.
What if it was your kid that fell into that pit? They are already screaming and crying; causing a scene because their injured from the fall and a wild animal starts dragging them like a rag doll. Would you think they are "protecting" your injured kid? Or playing with a crying child? That is how gorillas taunt before they kill their young. Watch some Animal Planet or do some research because you sound ridiculous.
Also we can agree on one thing; the mother who was there that day should be charge with child negligence and have her child taken from her. They aren't going to charge her for murder because she didn't pull the trigger; but her poor parenting skills caused the incident and someone like that should not have children. I get that accidents occur but the child tried climbing the fence for several minutes and people were yelling to get the mother's attention and she did not care. THAT is fucked up. it could have all been avoided. Β
Also yeah; thats what a grammar nazi is. You point out basic grammar errors to try and make yourself look superior and boost your ego. Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Really..? I think boosting your ego and the feeling of superiority works much better if you get involved in discussions where you neglect and ridiculize your opponent's point of view
Also, I'm not even a native speaker, so I really have no need to feel grammatically superior over somebody who has been speaking English their entire life.
Here, some articles where they explain why Harambe wasn't being aggresive. Have a nice read.
news.nationalgeographic.com/20β¦
www.news.com.au/technology/sciβ¦
Both of us have different opinions and let's just stay this way, because I don't think you will change your opinion simply by reading what I'm leaving you here.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nationalgeographic even states that they weren't sure:
"Whatβs more, sedatives take several minutes to set in, potentially agitating Harambe and increasing the risk of the child getting hurt or killed. The enclosureβs moat, a buffer zone, also posed a drowning risk."
and
"Harambeβs immense strength would have made even playful behavior dangerous for the child, says Maple, and the enclosure made sedating Harambe challenging and highly risky, requiring a particularly long shot with a tranquilizer dart gun."
Also the second site isn't credible all that much and it seems like a sketchy website; also PETA? They do more harm than good;
www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-β¦
So in a way, it kinda looses credibility there.
Also I wouldn't say I'm boosting my ego; I just know wild animals are dangerous and they act upon instinct. They aren't domesticated. They aren't "mentally ill" if they are aggressive. That is just in their nature.
π: 0 β©: 0
Well that's an awesome point.
π: 0 β©: 0
Niesamowita praca. PodobajΔ
mi siΔ kolory 
π: 0 β©: 1
dzieki. Mialo byc dramatycznie
π: 0 β©: 0
