Comments: 60
itifonhom In reply to ??? [2022-10-10 19:26:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
itifonhom In reply to tman300 [2015-02-18 18:11:29 +0000 UTC]
Many many thanks for your kind comment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
itifonhom In reply to FOTOSHOPIC [2014-09-02 11:32:10 +0000 UTC]
Looking great, thanks for let me know! Would prefer to "Share alike" though... but it´s ok.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FOTOSHOPIC In reply to itifonhom [2014-09-02 16:38:13 +0000 UTC]
I changed the license to share alike. Thanks for catching that and thanks again for the awesome stock.
Mitch
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FOTOSHOPIC In reply to itifonhom [2014-09-03 04:48:35 +0000 UTC]
It is a good feeling. I take some of my favorite hard won photos and put them out there as background and stock. There is so much on DA that I just want to give back. By the way I had your photo on my computer as a wall paper for a couple of weeks when I first came across it.
Mitch
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
itifonhom In reply to Baryonyx62 [2013-06-22 08:16:46 +0000 UTC]
Depends on how high the clouds are!!! Thanks for commenting!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dp500cat [2013-03-08 19:44:46 +0000 UTC]
very nice pic of Lothar's Dr1 - later he would have the top wing painted yellow as well
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shravanrawal [2012-12-23 08:34:14 +0000 UTC]
incredible workkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Manovich-art [2012-09-28 06:05:15 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JF-Miller [2012-09-07 21:11:26 +0000 UTC]
As itifonhom and I have discussed on another forum, where I told him I would discuss it elsewhere, I want to state that regarding the caption to his most excellent rendering in this thread, his art does not depict Lothar von Richthofen's 30th victory, as claimed. Lothar was flying a Fokker DVII that day, not a Fokker Dr.I, as shown. In fact, LvR never shot down any Sopwith Camels while flying a Dr.I.
Now, I know the point of this forum is art, so please understand this post is not an attack on itifonhom, his rendering, or art in general. Instead of critiquing his artwork, as this thread requested, I am critiquing his caption, because itifonhom has attached historical representation to this art—i.e., “…this report inspired me to create this image, LvR getting his 30th victory.” I.e., “this image is what it looked like.” In our discussion elsewhere ([link] ), itifonhom has been made aware and now understands his work does not historically depict the event his caption claims it does. He is very passionate about his art and art in general--I respect him for that--but said he "really doesn't care much" about historical accuracy—despite including accurate dates, times, and locations in his description—and thus refuses to change his caption, which he said he has posted on several other sites. As itifonhom is about art, I am very passionate about history and historical accuracy—especially when the latter is confirmed beyond doubt—and the old adage that if something is worth doing , it is worth doing right. This is where he and I have reached a civil impasse and agreed to disagree--about the caption, mind you, not the art. As I said, that looks great! It doesn’t depict Lothar von Richthofen’s 30th victory historically, but the visual rendering is fantastic! As I told him, it gives me a good and believable sense of altitude. I look forward to his future work.
To be clear and summarize, this post is neither about itifonhom personally, nor his art, visually. They need not be defended because neither is in question. What is in question is historical representation and how too much is “learned” this way via the internet, and how this “information” then becomes the headwaters of myth. As the events of LvR’s 30th victory compelled itifonhom to create an historical image that turned out to be erroneous—logic dictates that depicting the wrong airplane was an honest mistake, because why would someone intentionally use the wrong one? Besides, in another forum, he admitted he “got it wrong”—and since he will not change its caption after learning of this error, the responsibility to make sure others do not incorrectly use this image to “learn” the details of LvR’s 30th victory has compelled me to post here.
Over time I’ve gotten a sense that many artists consider the art itself to be more important than that which it represents. Thus, I suspect posting this here may garner disinterest in the subject of historical representation—fair enough, since this *is* an art site, after all—and perhaps even be misunderstood as an attack on artistic integrity in a brush-on-paper sense. Please understand this is not so and has never been my intent. My intent is to lead the horses to the clean water. That is all I can do. Now, that has been done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
itifonhom In reply to JF-Miller [2012-09-08 03:21:48 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the comment, glad you liked my "erroneous" work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bvcastilho3D [2012-08-31 19:29:32 +0000 UTC]
Very good.
Congratulations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
itifonhom In reply to garryts [2012-08-31 23:15:20 +0000 UTC]
Appreciate it, thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
neuer-geist [2012-08-27 15:24:15 +0000 UTC]
Great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jncarter [2012-08-27 06:45:33 +0000 UTC]
Lovely job mate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jncarter In reply to itifonhom [2012-08-27 23:30:15 +0000 UTC]
You're very welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fobok [2012-08-26 10:59:29 +0000 UTC]
Amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
viiik33 [2012-08-26 07:29:42 +0000 UTC]
very good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StratoArt [2012-08-25 23:55:00 +0000 UTC]
Sweetly done! I have Cinema 4D 13 did you use the advanced rendering method?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
itifonhom In reply to StratoArt [2012-08-26 11:26:42 +0000 UTC]
As advanced as I could think of! Physical renderer enabled, IR+QMC mode, GI, AO, Caustics, HDRI lighting and reflections and a lot tweaking on the materials.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StratoArt In reply to itifonhom [2012-08-27 18:41:38 +0000 UTC]
it's great! I wasn't sure if you had used an external renderer like VRay or something else. This looks great for C4D which I think has an excellent renderer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
itifonhom In reply to StratoArt [2012-08-27 19:44:56 +0000 UTC]
I agree, C4D internal is really great. Beside this, I prefer to keep my lighting real simple, most of the times a single area light with a HDRI sky as a fill light and reflections source. Although I'm really a newbie with C4D, I think it's mostly down to material tweaking than trying to get too many lights right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dinobatfan [2012-08-25 22:40:24 +0000 UTC]
Outstanding!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractialSpin [2012-08-25 20:49:12 +0000 UTC]
These machines, which seem so primitive now, were the forerunners of every attempt man made to get himself into the air, while trying to keep someone else out of it. Even though it was brutal, there was a certain romantiicism and honor between these men. A beautiful rendering. Makes you wonder what Lothar is thinking...trying to keep up with his better known brother, or feeling sorry for the guy he shot down?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
was471 [2012-08-25 20:26:26 +0000 UTC]
Nice work. Looks like that Camel is attempting an Immelmann, Lothar needs to do a Split-S to get to safety,..dive, DIVE!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
itifonhom In reply to warrior1944 [2012-08-25 20:49:50 +0000 UTC]
It´s a 3D model I bought and rendered... Thanks, glad you liked it!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>