Comments: 11
carlotta-guidicelli [2007-08-17 21:44:58 +0000 UTC]
The colors are great, and it looks so elegant! It almost looks like it's made out of glass or ice, which is a very nice effect...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Izile In reply to Kneise [2007-08-02 21:35:32 +0000 UTC]
There's only one in existence right now, and it's in a genetic lab in either Australia or Japan (I forget), but they will be breeding it to make more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gee231205 [2007-06-13 18:44:33 +0000 UTC]
wow i really like how you have painted this. it's so realistic and beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lady-Chika [2007-06-12 19:00:10 +0000 UTC]
I like it! There is actually a rose that's blue/white that hasn't been changed by bioengineers, at least I think. I believe it's called the Bluejay or something like that. Anyway nice work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Izile In reply to Lady-Chika [2007-06-12 19:23:08 +0000 UTC]
Since the late 1800's, there's been a standing reward for a true blue rose. They were previously possible to create due to the specifics of the rose genome. People could get lavender and silver, but never true blue. There's lots of roses with "blue" in the name, but none of them are actually blue. This is because roses naturally lack the gene to create blue pigment, but they have a predominant genetic predisposition for reds. To create a true blue rose, the bioengineers had to remove the red gene, take the blue gene delphinius (that's not quite the right word, but it's close) and then bond it to the rose genetic code with a spare bit from the iris genetic code, which is very similar to the rose code.
*breathe*
and thus, the first blue rose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Izile In reply to Izile [2007-06-12 19:23:51 +0000 UTC]
"previously possible" = "previous impossible" pardon typo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0