HOME | DD
j-vdb — 048.
Published: 2011-04-07 09:54:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 276; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Would you prefer/recommend a Sigma lens (which is cheaper) or better to stick with nikon? (or other brand the same of your camera)
Related content
Comments: 10
Depends on the lens, if you are buying the Nikon Professional lenses then quality ( both Build and optical ) will be better but any of their standard range of lenses will be equalled if not surpassed by Sigma or indeed most lens manufacturers. Also depends a lot on what size your finished print will be, if you never print bigger than A4 you will be hard pushed to tell the difference
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well in this picture I was testing a Nikkor AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G IF-ED VR Micro (which was 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macro should ideally be shot with a tripod so VR would be switched off ( or should be at least
) so that would not bother meif the savings are significant then go for the sigma, they make good lenses especially the macros
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thx for the comment, I think I might go for the Sigma..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I would probably prefer to stick to the same brand.
having said that I've had some good luck with other brands here and there at much less the money.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes I would also prefer Nikon of course, but if the quality would be just as good I would go for the Sigma. Cause in photography it's never about buying just that one lens...no we always have a whole wishlist....so saving here and there would be nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it's an expensive addiction to be sure.
but kind of like golf clubs... it's not so much what you have but how you use it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes!
mmyes....thats true, but I can imagine really good quality in material shows in your pictures too...
so the Hasselblad 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOL
well of course... the wish list only gets better and more expensive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
