HOME | DD

Jack070 — Seventy.

Published: 2010-05-13 19:17:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 670; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The exposutre may not be perfect, but it's not bad - it was a guess


Zorki 4 + Jupiter-8 + Tri-x
Related content
Comments: 15

Seiglie [2010-05-28 14:03:58 +0000 UTC]

Forget exposure, it's a beautiful capture! Besides, I don't see naything wrong with it.

Plus, you are shooting with a meter-less camera, estimating every aspect of the exposure. Plus, tri-x are pretty much forgiving film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to Seiglie [2010-05-28 18:00:03 +0000 UTC]

Yea, lack of the meter is giving the thrill that makes me want to rush the guy at lab asap to find out if any of the pictures is okay

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Seiglie In reply to Jack070 [2010-05-28 19:49:59 +0000 UTC]

On my first times at the lab I was terrified thinking I screwed up many shots because of the lack of a meter. At first I failed on more or less 10 frames, but in time I improved, failing only on 3 or 4 frames per roll. Still my biggest problem are the contrasty situations, and at night. Good luck I printed two weeks ago an exposure card, lets see how I things work out with it.

A pleasure mate!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to Seiglie [2010-05-28 22:21:47 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm trying to more-or-less follow the sunny 16 for now. It gives pretty much correct exposures, especially on the sunny days (when it's an obvious 11/16). But yea, correct doesn't mean good. I'm going to go through the whole roll on the sunny day underexposing at about -1EV, should look better. It will be whenever I will come across some money to spend on the film, got only one roll of Pan F 50 in my fridge. And that's the film I'm going to spare for slightly different purpose (planning on it being abstract/nature in the forest near-by, whenever I will have some time. With careful metering and such, of course )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MvMNL [2010-05-28 12:34:36 +0000 UTC]

nice one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to MvMNL [2010-05-28 17:59:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SkullsCrystal [2010-05-28 09:44:40 +0000 UTC]

Very nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to SkullsCrystal [2010-05-28 17:59:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SkullsCrystal In reply to Jack070 [2010-05-28 18:00:42 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

absinthFenix [2010-05-27 06:20:36 +0000 UTC]

It is not perfect exposure but it is perfect composition and wonderful moment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to absinthFenix [2010-05-27 08:38:40 +0000 UTC]

On the other hand, exposing more for the lights would kill the detail in shadows...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anoxado [2010-05-13 21:34:23 +0000 UTC]

Niezłe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to anoxado [2010-05-13 21:56:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bozack [2010-05-13 19:21:32 +0000 UTC]

wonderful photo!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to Bozack [2010-05-13 19:25:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0