Comments: 17
JackEavesArt In reply to megazoid [2010-04-18 14:21:39 +0000 UTC]
Wow thanks for the detailed critique! This piece is fairly old now and i've moved on from the 7-heads theory and more onto the 'relative measurements' theory that you've talk about here, however i appreciate the critique and hopefuly it can add to the piece in helping viewers learn more about how to construct anatomy by reading this critique.
I also learnt a bit about the hip to the shoulder / and knee to heel, so thanks again!
π: 0 β©: 0
PHOENIX-201 [2010-09-14 16:29:08 +0000 UTC]
EN OCASIONES
ME A LLEGADO
A COSTAR TRABAJO
ASER ALGUNAS POSES
π: 0 β©: 0
double-crow-stock [2009-10-27 13:30:04 +0000 UTC]
Proportions seem pretty on, I learned it as 7 1/2heads, so I may be seeing the legs as alittle shorter in your studies than in the photos. But you're doing great, you're finding the "weight" on the legs in the stance and recognizing shoulders and hips, which are really key in the "action" of a pose.
π: 0 β©: 1
double-crow-stock In reply to JackEavesArt [2009-10-28 03:35:56 +0000 UTC]
I believe the 1/2 is at the legs...but there are a few schools of thought, I was just taught that by my life drawing teachers. I've seen 7, 7 1/2 and 8 heads.
π: 0 β©: 1
Divine619 [2009-10-26 23:15:32 +0000 UTC]
Oh I have a tip, but you might already know. The foot is as long as the forearm so that's a good thing to remember when checking your proportions. xD
π: 0 β©: 1