HOME | DD

JackEavesArt β€” Anatomy 12

Published: 2009-10-26 21:54:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 13917; Favourites: 172; Downloads: 408
Redirect to original
Description Please read *megazoid s' critique below to gain a bit more information on how to construct the human body, i also have more anatomy peices in my gallery if you are interrested. Thanks for looking!.

- - -

More anatomy yay! Trying to persist with this '7 heads' proportion thing and decided to use some photo-reference to help me. I don't think they are perfect but im getting better, slowly!

Please if you spot anything wrong with the proportions /
anatomy or have any tutorials or tips that could help please let me know!

Comments and crit welcome as always.

Stock reference used here:



Male Stock 11 by *Katanaz-Stock
Female Stock 47 by *Katanaz-Stock
Female Stock 55 by *Katanaz-Stock
Shorts and Boots ::Stock 43:: by *spiked-stock
DCS - 1209 Manga Girl 18 by ~*double-crow-stock
Featured June 05 - Dove-Stock by *FullBodyShots
Related content
Comments: 17

MrRentaro [2013-06-06 18:41:44 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I think there is an overriding mistake in all of these, with the exception of the girl with the bow & arrow. The crotch/base of the hips should fall halfway down the body (3 1/2 mark,) not at the 4th head mark as you seem to be doing. This causes the torso to look elongated, and the legs to be too short. I had a lot of trouble with this way of proportioning things, so I moved to the more symmetrical 8-Head figure, but these are of course just guide-lines. Many if not most figures will have their own relative heights.

Otherwise, these are good exercises to perform and ending with an unreferenced pose is a good way to apply what you have learned through the process.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

megazoid [2010-04-18 13:20:21 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


One thing to consider about the 7 heads thing is that it requires that you visualize the image as flat, which you've done. An alternative it to measure proportions relatively. Such as the distance from the bottom of the neck to the top of the head equals the distance from the bottom of the rib cage to the bottom of the neck. Burne Hogarth does this all relative to the rib cage, especially the legs and arms.

Other relative measurements: the distance from the hip to the knee is equal to the hip to the shoulder (you can folder your knee to your shoulder) the distance from the knee to the heel is the same as the knee to the hip/buttock (you can fold your heel onto your buttock).

The idea is to have a set of relative measurements that gets all the proportions for all body parts, but can be a bit helpful when drawing in perspective.

One idea that emerges from these images is how the oval for the ribcage leads to the chest. In each of the images, the oval look almost like the front plane of the chest. So this brings up an interesting question. If I draw one of these stick figure things, what part of the final drawing does my oval end up as? So part of this learning process must be to memorize a plan or set of steps-- the oval in the stick figure will guide the creation of the chest by representing the front plane.


I noticed the 'unreferenced stock practice'. I take this to be that once you formed the stick figures you verified that they let you generate a successful drawing. Interesting idea to experiment then verify that experiment. This is a great idea.

Great stock references, and thanks for posting this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackEavesArt In reply to megazoid [2010-04-18 14:21:39 +0000 UTC]

Wow thanks for the detailed critique! This piece is fairly old now and i've moved on from the 7-heads theory and more onto the 'relative measurements' theory that you've talk about here, however i appreciate the critique and hopefuly it can add to the piece in helping viewers learn more about how to construct anatomy by reading this critique.

I also learnt a bit about the hip to the shoulder / and knee to heel, so thanks again!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

anakareninart [2010-09-14 17:12:11 +0000 UTC]

owww muuy buenoo!! y ΓΊtil

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PHOENIX-201 [2010-09-14 16:29:08 +0000 UTC]

EN OCASIONES
ME A LLEGADO
A COSTAR TRABAJO
ASER ALGUNAS POSES

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DaineN [2009-10-31 02:04:05 +0000 UTC]

This is quite interesting

Your proportions are good, but i do find the legs a little stumpy. I learned my proportions with 8 heads though

head - 1 head
neck - half
torso - 1
abdomen - half
hips - 1
thigh - 2
calves - 2

upper and lower arms 1 each

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackEavesArt In reply to DaineN [2009-10-31 16:16:19 +0000 UTC]

Okay thanks! I've altered my technique since this piece to 7 1/2 heads, but i might try some 8 head practices too, thanks again

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

double-crow-stock [2009-10-27 13:30:04 +0000 UTC]

Proportions seem pretty on, I learned it as 7 1/2heads, so I may be seeing the legs as alittle shorter in your studies than in the photos. But you're doing great, you're finding the "weight" on the legs in the stance and recognizing shoulders and hips, which are really key in the "action" of a pose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackEavesArt In reply to double-crow-stock [2009-10-27 18:13:58 +0000 UTC]

Great thanks for the comment and i'm glad you think im doing well! it really helps with confidence . Oh yeah, i kept thinking the legs were too short too so i think i will try 7 1/2 on my next studies to see which looks better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

double-crow-stock In reply to JackEavesArt [2009-10-28 03:35:56 +0000 UTC]

I believe the 1/2 is at the legs...but there are a few schools of thought, I was just taught that by my life drawing teachers. I've seen 7, 7 1/2 and 8 heads.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackEavesArt In reply to double-crow-stock [2009-10-28 10:01:43 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay thanks, i might try a few i different studies with more and less heads to see which i find more suitable.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Divine619 [2009-10-26 23:15:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh I have a tip, but you might already know. The foot is as long as the forearm so that's a good thing to remember when checking your proportions. xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackEavesArt In reply to Divine619 [2009-10-26 23:39:52 +0000 UTC]

Oh i didnt know that haha thanks for the tip

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Divine619 In reply to JackEavesArt [2009-10-27 01:58:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I tested it before by putting my foot on my forearm. Pretty close match.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tifa-bells [2009-10-26 22:02:22 +0000 UTC]

hmmmm i dont see anything wrong with proportions on this great job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackEavesArt In reply to tifa-bells [2009-10-26 22:09:50 +0000 UTC]

Oo thats good then
Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tifa-bells In reply to JackEavesArt [2009-10-26 22:44:29 +0000 UTC]

yw

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0