Description
This is a part of the next episode of 'Battle Beyond Epochs', in which I will feature the three mega carnivores of eastern African origin, each representing respective epochs in which they thrived during the Cenozoic; namely Megistotherium osteothlastes from the early Miocene, Agriotherium africanus from the Pliocene and the Natodomeri lion from the middle Pleistocene.
This piece depicts the Natodomeri lion pride devouring a carcass of the giant African Baffalo, Pelorovis antiquus.
:Description:
Newly discovered in 2018, a partial big cat skull (labelled as KNM-ND 59673) from Natodomeri, Kenya is considered to have belonged to the previously unknown ancient subspecies of the true lion, Panthera leo.
Above all else, the most astounding about the discovery should be its great size. KNM-ND 59673 is larger than all available specimens of the Ice Age cave lion(Panthera spelaea) and also larger than all but two specimens of the American lion(Panthera atrox) that Werdelin et al.(2018) studied for both the basal skull length and the palate length.
The oldest fossil record of the true lion in Africa dates back to almost 2 million years ago and all known prehistoric African lion specimens except for KNM-ND 59673 fall within the size range of the modern counterpart. It is unlikely however, that KNM-ND 59673 could simply be an outlier from known lion populations in Africa : rather, according to Werdelin et al.(2018), it must represent previously unknown, distinct subspecies that was substantially larger than any modern population of P. leo.
The fact that KNM-ND 59673 is the only specimen we have of the Natodomeri lion, therefore most likely belonged to only an average sized individual of the particular subspecies, makes it even more remarkable that it could rival some of the largest American lions in size(at least so regarding the skull length).
Such a population of hyper carnivorous, hyper predacious big cat could only be possible because of much greater biomass of megafauna in the Middle and Late Pleistocene than at present : occurrence of abundant megafauna, such as the giant buffalo Pelorovis antiquus or the short necked giraffe Sivatherium sp. at this time may have led to the evolution of larger lions to exploit this resource more extensively than today.
Image and text by ©Jagroar
Comments: 18
ghashogh [2023-04-07 07:11:39 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Admiralkim [2020-11-27 12:51:24 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Libra1010 [2020-07-06 13:14:45 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LADAlbarran2001 [2019-09-23 18:17:46 +0000 UTC]
A pack of these lions may have killed any prey, including giant pleistocene proposids. Very good representation, excellent!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Leonca [2019-09-21 00:46:36 +0000 UTC]
Always wondered how they separate "large than average known animal" from "new subspecies" from "new species of known animal" from "new species that just looks like known animal." Especially with these cat skulls that all look alike to me. Wonder how many they find where someone just got too excited at the possibility of naming something new.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jagroar In reply to Leonca [2019-09-21 22:37:53 +0000 UTC]
Haha, you can say that again, so true.
Regarding this specimen, for one thing it's 'morphologically' indistinguishable from modern lions and also there has been no trace of cave lions' existance ever recorded in Africa, so the possibilities might be narrowed down to two: It was simply an outlier(in other words, freakish) specimen size-wise, or a representative of the ancient subspecies larger than any known population of P. leo.
Divergence estimate of 120.2–384.8ka for extant lion haplotypes indicated by recent studies brackets the date for the Natodomeri lion. So, by a process of elimination, Werdelin et al. counted the last theory as the most plausible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Leonca In reply to Jagroar [2019-09-22 19:16:45 +0000 UTC]
Interesting. Now I'm wondering what was the biggest difference there has been found in a population that was labeled a subspecies instead of a new species. Like, if the population is X% bigger or smaller, etc. I guess dogs are a weird outlier but that wasn't natural selection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NRD23456 [2019-09-15 13:06:53 +0000 UTC]
That's amazing! I love the fact that you are now working on this beautiful big cat!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jagroar In reply to NRD23456 [2019-09-17 17:02:16 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your kind feedback!
This is one of prehistoric cats I've long wanted to do some elaborate reconstruction, ever since its discovery announced. Truly majestic cat indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NRD23456 In reply to Jagroar [2019-09-18 14:07:17 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome and yes, you're right!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Draco-sans [2019-09-14 14:06:14 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jagroar In reply to Zimices [2019-09-14 20:48:58 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, yes I'd like this lion to look slightly more 'prehistoric', by making the mane a bit smaller and the spotts more visible etc. Sure enough they should be confident, imagine the pride of these giant lions and the range of mega herbivores they could've preyed upon. I gather 'almost' no animals could be safe from these lions at the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0