HOME | DD

jailgurdnegative — Gemma 'Goldie' Estrada

Published: 2012-10-25 03:21:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 379; Favourites: 5; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description this is Goldie at 2198AD. I'm guessing she's around 47 years young. haha
what she looks like at 2170AD [link]

What makes her special is that she's the first successful female Clandon super soldier. She was to be Don Josef's spouse but that did not happen. Don Josef got engaged with a genius moon-borne woman,Rielle Deluna instead.
Anyway, she leads an all-female Clandon special forces company called SOG. She wears the latest power armor. Her attitude did not change much.

newer one [link]

Crimsol Don
Related content
Comments: 20

theGman0 [2012-10-25 16:12:02 +0000 UTC]

awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to theGman0 [2012-10-26 02:05:38 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ultrapunk [2012-10-25 04:48:38 +0000 UTC]

She doesn't need him, she needs her guns and powered armour.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to ultrapunk [2012-10-26 02:05:32 +0000 UTC]

The only toys she'll ever need.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravajava [2012-10-25 04:08:03 +0000 UTC]

No hard feelings I hope

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-25 04:38:39 +0000 UTC]

Apparently, she's a warrior first and a woman second. At least, she thinks that way. Perhaps the reason she spends so much time out in the battlefields is to bury her feelings for him with the sounds of war.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-25 04:48:43 +0000 UTC]

Interesting

Something to consider, how come a man can be a warrior and a man at the same time, but a woman it's one or the other

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-26 00:24:11 +0000 UTC]

that's good to know.

For me, the main difference between a man and a woman is that a woman can bear a child. So if the woman does not bear a child she isn't really being a woman in function but being a man with womanly features(hahaha). But that's just me... Something like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-26 00:51:18 +0000 UTC]

Interesting.

Maybe it's because I live in extremely left wing Canada where woman are a norm in our armed forces, and it's common for people to never have children in there entire life, but I think woman can do both. That and I would have no woman in Acadia by that definition, seeing as all the female leads are infertile.

But I digress.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-26 00:58:04 +0000 UTC]



Hmm, cool. Yeah, when a woman gives birth she becomes a "true woman" in a sense. She would then be a woman warrior!

Darn, the female leaders of Acadia are infertile? That's unexpected.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-26 01:05:47 +0000 UTC]

Lol, I guess that's also true.

(By female leads, I mean the main characters who happen to be female, ie Colette, Katya and Samantha) Yeah, if you are going to spend billions on making them into weapons capable of challenging armies, you don't want to also have to deal with certain woman's health issues in the middle of an ongoing campaign. Get rid of that, and they are just as capable as there male counterparts.

Not exactly something that comes up often when I talk about the story, obviously

It's an interesting trade though, no kiddies for immortality...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-26 02:11:13 +0000 UTC]

ahhh, I see.

Then again, they may not fully understand the pleasures of having kiddies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-26 02:20:52 +0000 UTC]

Well, they didn't have a choice in that matter

And there's always adoption, lot's of orphans in that universe...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-26 03:51:59 +0000 UTC]

haha, yeah.

I wonder how they'll be like when they outlive their adopted children. Being immortal has its cons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-26 04:05:24 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that would be hard to take I guess.

Albeit, I don't think I would trust any of them with children. They are either a sociopath, Moral nihilist or just mentally unstable because of how messed up there lives have been. So, it may not be a good idea in the first place for either party involved

True, of course, if you aren't religious, it doesn't seem that bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-26 17:10:48 +0000 UTC]

I can only imagine.

That they are. . . What have you planned for them?

I dunno, I think I'd rather be mortal...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-26 18:55:16 +0000 UTC]

OOh, the mystery, I guess you're just going to have to read Acadia

Yeah, the positives definitely outweigh the negatives

Unless everyone else dies in a Nuclear War, and you're the only one left. Then that would sorta suck

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-27 23:31:58 +0000 UTC]

ahhhh.. I see.

then you would probably be able to see the rebirth of the world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-27 23:39:11 +0000 UTC]

True, would be a lonely ride though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-27 23:59:00 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. That's true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0