Comments: 38
ErasmusEE [2008-04-27 04:26:10 +0000 UTC]
Just in case you do another, the turret are labeled A, B, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JanBoruta In reply to ErasmusEE [2008-04-27 08:12:28 +0000 UTC]
What's the difference?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DoctorGurgul [2007-03-31 22:28:55 +0000 UTC]
Everything is by far more than fine. But a little suggestion: these two upper turrets could be replaced by a single, solid one, armed with far heavier weapons- I'm not an engineering expert, but it could simplify all the design
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JanBoruta In reply to DoctorGurgul [2007-04-04 13:46:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, it would. But then the ship would be very vulnerable to attack from behind of that turret. Smaller weapons in greater quantity are always better than a single BFG.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CosmOSmocker In reply to JanBoruta [2012-07-15 10:49:32 +0000 UTC]
clear as ice. but then, a good set of guns all round with one BFG on a tactical position...^^ don't mean a 500mm bastard, but a single barrel 400, mixed with two 240's...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JanBoruta In reply to A-Teivos [2007-02-19 14:40:51 +0000 UTC]
It shouldn't indeed. I'm going to do some frigates and cruisers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xeoram [2007-02-18 21:37:51 +0000 UTC]
Swanky as hell.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DingoPatagonico [2007-02-18 19:16:06 +0000 UTC]
yesssss i like this thing ^^ small, but very well armed !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DingoPatagonico In reply to JanBoruta [2007-02-18 19:48:41 +0000 UTC]
jajajajajajaja MORE WEAPONS! XDDDDDD
your welcome ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SimonLMoore [2007-02-18 16:17:58 +0000 UTC]
Detail is up to the usual excellent standard!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thyself [2007-02-18 14:40:34 +0000 UTC]
You know what that looks like? The American Civil War Ironclads. Is that where you got the idea? Yes or no its still a terrific design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1