Comments: 18
Aussie-Blonde [2009-03-27 04:26:10 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous, she does look huge in this pic!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aussie-Blonde In reply to Jasman71 [2009-03-27 07:56:25 +0000 UTC]
well she is in a good spot then!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jasman71 In reply to 12jack12 [2009-03-27 13:58:45 +0000 UTC]
Same here. I will get a few lenses, not so much huge Long Toms, but certainly wide angles for my sky shots.. If I want to upgrade later then I shall look at the D300, or 700..or (gasp) D3...
I usually have a policy of getting a backup in case something goes wrong with one, so I have looked at the 60, but i also found the Fujifilm S5Pro, which takes Nikon lenses, and being a Fuji user for many years I may look at getting one of those too, but we'll see..
Thaks, I'll have a look at that site - I may have seen a few reviews on there already - -but another good one to find is WhatDigitalCamera, they just do 5 or 6 minute reviews but are quite comprehensive..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jasman71 In reply to 12jack12 [2009-03-28 14:51:42 +0000 UTC]
I know a guy here who got a K20 cos he had a 35mm Pentax beforehand, so the same thing - he uses hos old lenses on it. He says he has a slight bit of barrelling on one or two of the zooms, but otherwise they work ok. I was looking for a long time at a Sony 350, 14 mp, tilting lcd, but 2 things swung me to the Nikon - the former's lenses do not get as good a reviews as those for the Nikon (including 3rd party makes, though obviously you can use most for either), and also the frame rate, handy of I want to shoot birds again...the Sony is about 2.5/sec, the D90 just under 5. My friend has 3 Canons, and they are great and all, but the lenses can be more expensive. So I'll go for the Nikon and see how I get on with that (my dad had an F801 about 20 years ago and that was fantastic!)
Mind you...Hasselblad H3...39mp... yeah dream on, Jas..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
boot-cheese-3000 [2009-03-26 23:16:03 +0000 UTC]
uh-uh now! attack of the 50-ft. pussy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0