Comments: 26
Lilbee82 [2006-03-02 19:52:19 +0000 UTC]
You do great work and have a wonderful talent.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
neversweet [2004-08-06 10:22:14 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful... i like how you did the flowers in her hair... the colours are amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
devilicious [2004-08-05 15:31:44 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous subject!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nykolai [2004-08-05 05:39:09 +0000 UTC]
I like the pose of the girl - a well chosen reference. =]
There are a couple of things that disturb me a bit in this one: The brush strokes are very chaotic in places, mainly those indicating the curls and the part of the background behind her back. Otherwise I like the not so smooth finish of this piece.
Another thing are the skin colours. They may well have been like this in the photo, but the extreme yellows on her ear and forehead, and the green dash on her left eyelid make it look awkward, as does the pure white of her eyes. White (just as black) is a void in paintings. Rather use very light colours for anything you want to appear white (or very dark ones instead of pure black), it gives it more volume. The colours used on her face make it look flat, there is no real range of hues other than variations of the same colour. Here is where colour theory would come in useful. As said, even if it was like this in the original; picture, photos often are distorted in colour, so picking the colours from the photo is best avoided if you are aiming for a realistic, non-digitalised result. As it stands here, it looks more like a worked on photo than carefully applied colour with brush strokes that define the facial features.
Next would be the pixellisation around some of the edges, as well as the rather strange rough sharpness of the edges, mainly again around the curls and her back. Especially around the curls the backgroud "flares", which normally indicates applying a filter or plug-in, or simply that the brushing wasn't through through carefully enough. "Flare" happens when you paint hair (or anything else), and then try and apply a backgroudn around it, instead of painting the background first, then paint the hair.
Since I know how you create your works, maybe it would be wise to think over the finer details of your technique to avoid above mentioned flaws. =]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nykolai In reply to jossif [2004-08-05 22:10:51 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome.
A little manual touching up of the face would probably work wonders already.
I work at 9000px minimum, usually between 12.000px and 20.000px. So, yes, I use the unsharp mask as well when I resize, but also fade it a little after applying it, so the edges won't come up flaring.
Ah, hair is pretty easy, actually. You already paint just bundles of hair, which is best when painted. Look at the flow of the hair, and use the base colour of the hair to define that in broad strokes. Next, choose the medium highlight colour and apply it on top, working with the flow of the hair, then the highlights and shadows in the same way. Abstraction is the key in that case, funnily enough, to get a good realistic result. Even fuzzy or curly hair has one constant flow, although it may not be apparent immediately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nykolai In reply to jossif [2004-08-06 05:26:02 +0000 UTC]
Usually I keep it at 25% or less of the original size while painting, since 25% is the print size at 300dpi. So, if it looks fine at that size, it doesn't matter what it looks like at 100%. I just zoom in to 100% if I do extreme photo realism from reference material, otherwise no.
It depends on how big the image is, so I cannot give you exact brush sizes at all. Nothing too small however, or else it becomes ridiculously tedious. I only ever really use the hard round paintbrush for painting, and have the opacity jitter switched to pen pressure (in PS), as well as the size jitter when painting fine details. That's all. =]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nykolai In reply to jossif [2004-08-06 17:49:17 +0000 UTC]
=]
I have painted various things, but my main focus is still on the human face.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0