HOME | DD

Description
Okay... this is probably gonna tick some people off.
But let me make ONE thing clear before this begins...
I did not report this person out of spite, I reported that "Hmmm, maybe a mature warning tag" would be wise, considering that there are bare breasts as well as partial vaginal imagery in this...
The response I got back was this......
Now....lets see....
Here we can see part of Mawk1's piece.
Now, I know this is gonna get back to this person somehow, So if you are reading, I did NOT want this piece deleted, it is just I felt a mature warning tag would be a good idea, that way, a piece of art doesn't get destroyed, and no kids get flashed
My beef here is not with the artist, it is with the person who felt there was no need for a mature content warning tag......
Now, considering that bare breasts are in view... as well as partial vaginal...I find this pretty interesting...
Considering that I have seen some deviations outright deleted for less.
I fail to see how the judgement rendered is sound.
I'd like to know other peoples thoughts about this particular decision.

And, I remind you all... I am NOT bashing, hating, otherwise flaming Mawk1. Actually, in all honesty, I am laughing at the fact that if the government was full of more people like the judge who decided that bare tits and snatch in this piece doesn't need a mature content warning, then video games and pornography would be highly praised forms of art and expression in the world XDDDDDDDDD and the thought of that makes me laugh until I want to throw up.

But seriously, remember kids, study in school, or you might end up like the guy who made this piece safe for youngin's to view. Good job.

The actual artwork in this Piece is copyright of Mawk1
whereas the incompetence is copyright of DA.
Only the rant is mine XD

Description
Okay... this is probably gonna tick some people off.
But let me make ONE thing clear before this begins...
I did not report this person out of spite, I reported that "Hmmm, maybe a mature warning tag" would be wise, considering that there are bare breasts as well as partial vaginal imagery in this...
The response I got back was this......
Now....lets see....
Here we can see part of Mawk1's piece.
Now, I know this is gonna get back to this person somehow, So if you are reading, I did NOT want this piece deleted, it is just I felt a mature warning tag would be a good idea, that way, a piece of art doesn't get destroyed, and no kids get flashed
My beef here is not with the artist, it is with the person who felt there was no need for a mature content warning tag......
Now, considering that bare breasts are in view... as well as partial vaginal...I find this pretty interesting...
Considering that I have seen some deviations outright deleted for less.
I fail to see how the judgement rendered is sound.
I'd like to know other peoples thoughts about this particular decision.

And, I remind you all... I am NOT bashing, hating, otherwise flaming Mawk1. Actually, in all honesty, I am laughing at the fact that if the government was full of more people like the judge who decided that bare tits and snatch in this piece doesn't need a mature content warning, then video games and pornography would be highly praised forms of art and expression in the world XDDDDDDDDD and the thought of that makes me laugh until I want to throw up.

But seriously, remember kids, study in school, or you might end up like the guy who made this piece safe for youngin's to view. Good job.

The actual artwork in this Piece is copyright of Mawk1
whereas the incompetence is copyright of DA.
Only the rant is mine XD