HOME | DD

Kaede-chama — I SUPPORT THE RIGHT...

Published: 2008-10-23 21:01:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 1085; Favourites: 52; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description LOLOLOL BEAR ARMS MAKE BEAR HUGS GEDDIT

reeeeally random idea, probably been done before but oh well, I didn't check |D

For the record, I do not in fact support the right to have weapons, which is the joke here, of course. What's the point of bearing arms? To protect yourself? Against what, other people who bear arms? Yeah, sure, there are knives and axes in the world, but at least (for the most part) they're actually meant for mundane purposes. Guns are meant for one thing and one thing only, death, and I'm just not a death-y kinda person.

And hunters... yeah, well, don't go on any human hunting sprees, then, ok? And make sure you're eating what you catch, I can't abide by senseless slaughter. (and really, taxidermy'd animals are freakin' scary.)

Anyway, silly little poster thingy. And an excuse to draw hugging bearses, d'aaaaaw<3

art copyright *Kaede-chama
Related content
Comments: 60

Dinru [2009-03-11 01:28:54 +0000 UTC]

Aww :3 I wuv it, and I agree with your views. Ya don't' need guns people, all you need is luv~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-11 16:35:40 +0000 UTC]

Hee, thank you, and thanks for the fave! Too right, man! No guns needed here, plzkthx >_<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-11 22:13:14 +0000 UTC]

If someone wants to protect themselves that badly, they should learn a martial art or something! Hands are the best weapons, because they can protect but can be controlled easily~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-13 14:53:49 +0000 UTC]

as long as the person you're defending yourself from doesn't grab your hands...! 0-0

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-13 21:54:34 +0000 UTC]

True, true... then you must use your legs, I guess!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-13 22:01:57 +0000 UTC]

true, true. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-13 22:41:25 +0000 UTC]

Now, if someone's bound and gagged... that's a problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-15 02:45:32 +0000 UTC]

Then we're just back to the whole "don't hurt people" idea...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-15 02:49:13 +0000 UTC]

True, true... that would be nice, wouldn't it? But, in the words of my boyfriend, "There will never be a world without violence unless it is a world without life. Violence is usually programed into our subconscious: as much as we try to get rid of it, it's still what we're designed to do." I hate to say it, but he is absolutely right. But it's nice to dream (and also to spread the word!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-15 03:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Well ok how about unnecessary violence, then? Absolutely no need to go about invading other countries, it just isn't right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-15 04:07:30 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I agree and I bet he would too! Unless it's absolutely needed to save lives, and then the minimum action necessary should be taken (sort of a kill a child to save a village sort of situation at times though . But... there are rare occasions when violence is justified, usually when someone uses it in an unjustified manner and people need to protect/be protected...)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-15 04:09:20 +0000 UTC]

That gets so murky sometimes, augh... I just wish they wouldn't do the unjustified thing in the first place! >x<;;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-15 04:21:09 +0000 UTC]

I know, right? But people are people... you can't change that, sad as some aspects of it may be (this is sort of becoming a circular conversation, no?)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Dinru [2009-03-15 05:16:32 +0000 UTC]

heh, this topic tends to create them. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinru In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-16 21:55:06 +0000 UTC]

I can imagine :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fueraqua [2009-01-27 22:34:40 +0000 UTC]

That's such a great poster!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Fueraqua [2009-01-28 02:25:50 +0000 UTC]

haha, thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fueraqua In reply to Kaede-chama [2009-03-01 00:24:46 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dollyfish [2008-12-02 20:38:26 +0000 UTC]

WAIT HOW DID I MISS THIS?!?!?!?!
LOVELOVELOVELOVELOVEEEE

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to dollyfish [2008-12-02 20:43:52 +0000 UTC]

IDK (MY BFF JILL?)

HAHAHA THANK YOU FOR EL FAVE xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WallynSimonsGirl [2008-10-25 02:24:11 +0000 UTC]

Aw, very cuddly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to WallynSimonsGirl [2008-10-25 02:27:22 +0000 UTC]

thank you! x3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WallynSimonsGirl In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-25 07:41:23 +0000 UTC]

WELCOME!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xToMatoLoviNx [2008-10-24 23:36:03 +0000 UTC]

lolz

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to xToMatoLoviNx [2008-10-24 23:39:58 +0000 UTC]

thankyou for faving~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AntimonyKohl [2008-10-24 02:25:31 +0000 UTC]

Cute, hey You should make this a print, my school needs some posters with this type of message, somebody got stabbed a few weeks ago.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to AntimonyKohl [2008-10-24 17:18:31 +0000 UTC]

I'm gonna hafta tweak it if I do, it's only about three inches across Print Size. That and artists on dA don't get a very big cut off their prints >3>;

but goodness, a stabbing D: Are... are they ok?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AntimonyKohl In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-24 23:47:02 +0000 UTC]

yeah, luckily the person missed all vital stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to AntimonyKohl [2008-10-24 23:47:45 +0000 UTC]

*whew* goodness gracious D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drayon84 [2008-10-24 02:19:53 +0000 UTC]

Just got on my devwatch and this was the first thing to catch my attention. It tis Awesome! Instant Fav+

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Drayon84 [2008-10-24 17:18:47 +0000 UTC]

haha, thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mangie03 [2008-10-24 00:19:08 +0000 UTC]

deyy is too cute >w<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Mangie03 [2008-10-24 00:28:30 +0000 UTC]

dankeee<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anterras [2008-10-23 22:39:47 +0000 UTC]

Not a bear, but /hug anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Anterras [2008-10-23 22:46:46 +0000 UTC]

good thing you're not a bear, that hug woulda prolly hurt D:

LOL irony...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anterras In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-24 12:52:28 +0000 UTC]

LOL. Not necessarily.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Anterras [2008-10-24 17:30:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm just curious as to why nobody's pointed out that when REAL bear arms hug you, mauling is usually gonna come next, which ruins the anti-violence tack here...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anterras In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-24 22:40:38 +0000 UTC]

Mauling doesn't always happen. Just not that uncommon. Especially if the bear is hungry and/or in a bad mood. If the bear is happy and fed, and knows you, they really can hug you, but they're a little squeezy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to Anterras [2008-10-24 22:52:38 +0000 UTC]

Well, ok, maybe. I'd still like those claws kinda far away from me, plzkthx. xD;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anterras In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-26 13:31:57 +0000 UTC]

ROFL Maybe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

innerdeepness [2008-10-23 21:45:05 +0000 UTC]

aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh! it's So CUTE! *highsqueekyvoicethatcanbreakeardrums*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to innerdeepness [2008-10-23 21:52:40 +0000 UTC]

hahaha thanks xD oh noes! my eardrums are broken!! Ma'am, you're bearing arms already with that destructive voice of yours!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

innerdeepness In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-25 14:10:17 +0000 UTC]

oh good. i'm armed against the dangorous crimanals of Sunderland. (although i think my spelling might be more of a wepon)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to innerdeepness [2008-10-25 15:24:13 +0000 UTC]

Yes, your spelling can be used to drive spelling-nitpicks into insanity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

innerdeepness In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-25 17:37:27 +0000 UTC]

what a sweet thing to say!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to innerdeepness [2008-10-25 23:42:04 +0000 UTC]

>|D

I was joking, by the way, I'm not THAT bad of a nitpick... I spare my friends, usually...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

innerdeepness In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-26 17:14:53 +0000 UTC]

that's good. so was i.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to innerdeepness [2008-10-26 18:20:00 +0000 UTC]

ok good. it's hard to tell online sometimes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

innerdeepness In reply to Kaede-chama [2008-10-29 00:48:18 +0000 UTC]

ok... well, new rule: when in doubt, i'm being sarcastic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaede-chama In reply to innerdeepness [2008-10-29 01:08:43 +0000 UTC]

ok xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>