HOME | DD

kanyiko — Macchi C.202 Folgore 374-6

#aircraft #italy #macchi #model #c202 #folgore
Published: 2016-09-17 19:46:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 1639; Favourites: 37; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description Macchi C.202 Folgore 374-6 of the 374° Squadriglia, 153° Gruppo Autonomo, 51° Stormo, Regia Aeronautica, Mediterrean field of operations, sometime during 1942-1943.

The Macchi C.202 Folgore (Thunderbolt) of 1940 was a development of the Macchi C.200 Saetta (Arrow) of 1937.  The latter, the C.200, was an easy to fly, stable and relatively faultless fighter and fighter-bomber aircraft, which nevertheless was beginning to become outdated at the beginning of the Second World War, just because it lacked in performance because of its weak Fiat A.74 radial engine, itself a redesign of the American Pratt & Whitney R-1830 Twin Wasp.

The C.202 was an attempt at curing this: it mated the wings, tailplane and landing gear of the C.200 with a newly designed fuselage, itself designed around the German Daimler-Benz DB-601 engine, the same engine used on the Messerschmitt Bf 109E.  The result was a higly capable fighter, which immediately was ordered into production.

In service, the C.202 proved itself a highly capable aircraft, albeit with some faults which affected its combat-effectiveness.  The main faults among these were the radio units, which were unreliable, often forcing pilots to communicate with one another with hand gestures and wing wagging; the Breda-SAFAT 12.7-mm machine guns, which had a low rate of fire and were prone to jamming; the limited amount of ammunition the aircraft could carry with it; and most damning, the lack of armament: most C.202s carrying only two machine guns in the nose.

Despite all this, the C.202 proved itself a highly capable dogfighter: by 1942, the C.202 outnumbered all other fighter types in Italian service, and nearly all of Italy's aces during World War II flew the type.  However, it took Macchi four to five times longer to build a C.202 than it took Messerschmitt to build a Bf 109 (22.000 manhours vs. 4000-6000 manhours), and attrition claimed a lot of C.202s: by the Italian Armastice of September  1943, only 186 Folgores remained, of which 100 airworthy.  Also, by September of 1942, the C.202 was progressively replaced by Macchi's C.205 Veltro (Greyhound), an improved version of the C.202 powered by the Daimler-Benz DB605, and uparmed with a cannon armament.

Other than the Italian air forces (the Regia Aeronautica, or air force of Fascist Italy prior to the September 1943 Armastice; and the Nazi-alligned Aeronautica Nazionale Reppublicana and Allied-alligned Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana following the Armastice), the Folgore was also used in small numbers by the Nazi-alligned "Independent State of Croatia" (22), and the German Luftwaffe (12). Following the introduction of the C.205, a number of C.202s were re-engined with Daimler-Benz DB605 engines, and flown as Macchi C.202/205 conversions, a number of which were sold to the Royal Egyptian Air Force after the end of the War.

1/72 Italeri 1222
Inventory number 694 - purchased September 19th 2008
Fifteenth model completed in 2016
Related content
Comments: 43

JacekPL207 [2021-03-26 13:10:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to JacekPL207 [2021-03-27 21:08:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FRIEND711 [2017-07-24 23:46:40 +0000 UTC]

I have a 1/144 version of this XP

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to FRIEND711 [2017-07-26 10:17:46 +0000 UTC]

1/144?  Wow, how did you even build that, it's such a small scale to work with!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FRIEND711 In reply to kanyiko [2017-07-26 11:34:02 +0000 UTC]

XD I can't take the credit, it's a F-toys(yes, that's it's name. Don't judge me I didn't name the company ^^") product, half of it is already done and it's colored, all I do is make it and put the decorative stickers on. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HERBERT45 [2017-03-18 04:41:45 +0000 UTC]

I actually built this model with the same desert pattern years ago.  It's a cool looking airplane.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to HERBERT45 [2017-03-18 10:08:34 +0000 UTC]

It certainly is!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eyepilot13 [2016-10-12 12:30:12 +0000 UTC]

One of the most aesthetically pleasing fighters of WWII and a personal fav... I built one just like this when I was younger!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zkfanart [2016-10-10 17:15:50 +0000 UTC]

A beautiful and by sure one of the best italian types of the war, with all the limtations. Nice model indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to zkfanart [2016-11-01 20:36:31 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zkfanart In reply to kanyiko [2016-11-02 21:33:16 +0000 UTC]

welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

County1006 [2016-09-24 12:59:49 +0000 UTC]

Brilliant job as ever!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to County1006 [2016-09-24 20:52:31 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

County1006 In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-24 20:56:50 +0000 UTC]

Welcome Dear Boy!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tankdog81 [2016-09-20 06:06:27 +0000 UTC]

I'm building the very same plane right now.
And it gives me a very hard time trying to fit the lower half of the nose.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

burstlion [2016-09-18 12:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to burstlion [2016-09-18 22:26:49 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

demones [2016-09-18 10:19:36 +0000 UTC]

Very good !!! love this model !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to demones [2016-09-18 22:27:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DBrentOGara [2016-09-18 03:05:34 +0000 UTC]

Very cool! I like the history of this one... a P40's parts on a Bf 109E's fuselage, it's a real frankenstein!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-18 22:37:01 +0000 UTC]

Oh, there are definitely much worse offenders if it comes to that - the worst of which being the Fisher P-75 (anything but an) "Eagle", quite literally a 'kitbash' airplane.  The prototype had the tail of a Douglas SBD Dauntless divebomber; the landing gear of a Vought F4U Corsair; the outer wing panels of a Curtiss P-40 Warhawk (later replaced with the outer wing panels of a North American P-51 Mustang); an engine placed behind the cockpit like that on the Bell P-39 Airacobra; and all of the flight properties of a brick... >.>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DBrentOGara In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 04:47:40 +0000 UTC]

Wow! That's pretty crazy I'll have to check this one out!

...man, that was one interesting experiment. I love the contra-rotating props, but the rest of it really was a life-sized kit-bash!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-19 08:19:17 +0000 UTC]

It was literally General Motors' way of saying "We reeeeeally don't want to build the B-29 as well as the Grumman Wildcat and Grumman Avenger - let's do something to make it look as if we're too busy!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DBrentOGara In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 10:51:06 +0000 UTC]

They were kinda clever about it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-19 10:57:34 +0000 UTC]

Well, it certainly was the oddest thing to fly since the Royal Air Force told Westland - You know, we still have a lot of DH-9 spare parts lying about - can you build a new aircraft out of them?

www.adf-gallery.com.au/gallery…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DBrentOGara In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 11:12:18 +0000 UTC]

Fascinating! These people are pretty crazy!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MensjeDeZeemeermin [2016-09-18 02:41:16 +0000 UTC]

Great write-up!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to MensjeDeZeemeermin [2016-09-18 22:37:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

benitezdk [2016-09-18 01:51:09 +0000 UTC]

.... Hmmmm! ....  (22.000 man-hours vs. 4000-6000 man-hours) ....  ..... Not uncommon for Italian industry! ...  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to benitezdk [2016-09-18 22:42:48 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't just the Italians - the Germans never really optimised their war production until almost at the end of the War.  By then, they were churning out thousands of aircraft a month... but had too few (surviving) pilots to fly them, or any of the fuel to power them...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Deamand [2016-09-18 01:34:03 +0000 UTC]

Ive always thought C202 was a good looking fighter even thought it always has a lot of issues.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to Deamand [2016-09-18 22:44:37 +0000 UTC]

It certainly is quite a looker.

There must be some degree of irony in my building sequence, though - I built the C.205 a couple of years ago; only now came around to the C.202; and now that one's completed, the C.200 is waiting for me... >.>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deamand In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 05:07:21 +0000 UTC]

indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gymnosophist [2016-09-17 22:52:07 +0000 UTC]

    Another "masterpiece"... Also nice to see notice being given to the "forgotten" WW II Italian aircraft...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to gymnosophist [2016-09-18 22:55:58 +0000 UTC]

... and there's still a Fiat CR.32, three CR.42s, a BR-20, a Macchi C.200, a Caproni Ca.311, a Ca.314, and a Savoia-Marchetti SM-81 following from where that came from...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gymnosophist In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-18 23:03:29 +0000 UTC]

  Truly, you're amazing...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to gymnosophist [2016-09-18 23:06:03 +0000 UTC]

... nope, just hopelessly behind with my buy/build ratio... D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gymnosophist In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 00:13:38 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DingoPatagonico [2016-09-17 20:07:10 +0000 UTC]

always loved this plane

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to DingoPatagonico [2016-09-18 22:44:47 +0000 UTC]

:3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JoshTheBirateLord [2016-09-17 19:48:26 +0000 UTC]

Nice model here!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kanyiko In reply to JoshTheBirateLord [2016-09-17 19:51:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshTheBirateLord In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-17 19:52:10 +0000 UTC]

Welcome ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0