Comments: 43
JacekPL207 [2021-03-26 13:10:05 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FRIEND711 [2017-07-24 23:46:40 +0000 UTC]
I have a 1/144 version of this XP
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FRIEND711 In reply to kanyiko [2017-07-26 11:34:02 +0000 UTC]
XD I can't take the credit, it's a F-toys(yes, that's it's name. Don't judge me I didn't name the company ^^") product, half of it is already done and it's colored, all I do is make it and put the decorative stickers on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HERBERT45 [2017-03-18 04:41:45 +0000 UTC]
I actually built this model with the same desert pattern years ago. It's a cool looking airplane.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to HERBERT45 [2017-03-18 10:08:34 +0000 UTC]
It certainly is!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eyepilot13 [2016-10-12 12:30:12 +0000 UTC]
One of the most aesthetically pleasing fighters of WWII and a personal fav... I built one just like this when I was younger!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zkfanart [2016-10-10 17:15:50 +0000 UTC]
A beautiful and by sure one of the best italian types of the war, with all the limtations. Nice model indeed!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
County1006 [2016-09-24 12:59:49 +0000 UTC]
Brilliant job as ever!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
County1006 In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-24 20:56:50 +0000 UTC]
Welcome Dear Boy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tankdog81 [2016-09-20 06:06:27 +0000 UTC]
I'm building the very same plane right now.
And it gives me a very hard time trying to fit the lower half of the nose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
burstlion [2016-09-18 12:53:02 +0000 UTC]
Nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
demones [2016-09-18 10:19:36 +0000 UTC]
Very good !!! love this model !!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-18 22:37:01 +0000 UTC]
Oh, there are definitely much worse offenders if it comes to that - the worst of which being the Fisher P-75 (anything but an) "Eagle", quite literally a 'kitbash' airplane. The prototype had the tail of a Douglas SBD Dauntless divebomber; the landing gear of a Vought F4U Corsair; the outer wing panels of a Curtiss P-40 Warhawk (later replaced with the outer wing panels of a North American P-51 Mustang); an engine placed behind the cockpit like that on the Bell P-39 Airacobra; and all of the flight properties of a brick... >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-19 08:19:17 +0000 UTC]
It was literally General Motors' way of saying "We reeeeeally don't want to build the B-29 as well as the Grumman Wildcat and Grumman Avenger - let's do something to make it look as if we're too busy!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DBrentOGara In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 10:51:06 +0000 UTC]
They were kinda clever about it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-19 10:57:34 +0000 UTC]
Well, it certainly was the oddest thing to fly since the Royal Air Force told Westland - You know, we still have a lot of DH-9 spare parts lying about - can you build a new aircraft out of them?
www.adf-gallery.com.au/gallery…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DBrentOGara In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 11:12:18 +0000 UTC]
Fascinating! These people are pretty crazy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kanyiko In reply to benitezdk [2016-09-18 22:42:48 +0000 UTC]
It wasn't just the Italians - the Germans never really optimised their war production until almost at the end of the War. By then, they were churning out thousands of aircraft a month... but had too few (surviving) pilots to fly them, or any of the fuel to power them...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Deamand [2016-09-18 01:34:03 +0000 UTC]
Ive always thought C202 was a good looking fighter even thought it always has a lot of issues.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to Deamand [2016-09-18 22:44:37 +0000 UTC]
It certainly is quite a looker.
There must be some degree of irony in my building sequence, though - I built the C.205 a couple of years ago; only now came around to the C.202; and now that one's completed, the C.200 is waiting for me... >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to kanyiko [2016-09-19 05:07:21 +0000 UTC]
indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kanyiko In reply to gymnosophist [2016-09-18 22:55:58 +0000 UTC]
... and there's still a Fiat CR.32, three CR.42s, a BR-20, a Macchi C.200, a Caproni Ca.311, a Ca.314, and a Savoia-Marchetti SM-81 following from where that came from...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to gymnosophist [2016-09-18 23:06:03 +0000 UTC]
... nope, just hopelessly behind with my buy/build ratio... D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1