Comments: 13
gamebalance [2011-10-16 07:22:59 +0000 UTC]
nice )))
Also what is it to be proud for about "not changed anything" I m very sure the tune up for the photography is absolutely fine by at least 2 reasons:
1. eye percept much wider range than the paper or monitor gives.
2. to diliever the feelings about the subject. Because in the real person see much more things around and smells air, feel the wind, you know?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Katzilla13 In reply to gamebalance [2011-10-16 07:29:43 +0000 UTC]
No, you got me wrong. It's not that I was *proud* of not changing anything, it's just to say that I didn't tweak the controls to paint the sky in a way it never looked in real life. I agree, the human eye is much more capable of showing us a scene (especially when the light is difficult) than a camera, and we need imaging software to make up for that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
gamebalance In reply to Katzilla13 [2011-10-16 07:35:08 +0000 UTC]
As a fresh example I just see there down in DA - [link]
I bet it was pretty much enchaced.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gamebalance In reply to Katzilla13 [2011-10-16 07:33:24 +0000 UTC]
Well I was talking about enchacing image DRAMATICALLY )))))))))))
Kiddin )))
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Behrfeet [2011-10-15 21:51:54 +0000 UTC]
beautiful shot .... and it does remind me so much of something you would see from a travelogue from the African savanna.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1