Comments: 27
acepredator [2014-09-26 03:07:00 +0000 UTC]
Apprentice.y it crushed vertebrates rather than shells because it lived in a forest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
King-Edmarka In reply to acepredator [2014-09-26 10:45:59 +0000 UTC]
Definitely haven't ruled out that lifestyle for this animal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to King-Edmarka [2014-09-26 19:14:32 +0000 UTC]
Isotope analysis seems to suggest that as the most likely lifestyle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProcrastinatingStill In reply to acepredator [2014-11-01 14:56:39 +0000 UTC]
If it did crush bones then it was most likely a scavenger. The beak would be for probing carcasses. The teeth would be for extracting bone marrow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProcrastinatingStill In reply to acepredator [2014-11-01 23:07:15 +0000 UTC]
Actually Dsungaripterus probably did live near water. Here's what Jaime Headden told me.
"The dsungaripteroids have the lowest values ranging from 13.6 to 15.1‰. Such low values are clearly in accordance with a fresh-water consumption and/or fossilisation."
Note that the apparently ocean-going Pteranodon is given as a plausible marine or terrestrial animal, rather than as a fully marine species, despite its apparent aquatic feeding habits. Conversely, tapejarids are supported by other studies as durophages and may have specialized in inland environments. Problematic with tooth/bone isotope studies is that they reflect not just ingestion rates of isotope bearing foods but also relationship of burial. All of these taxa are buried in aquatic environments, but dsungaripterids in the Tugulu are buried in shallow-water, inland sea environments, with strong association to shallow water ostracods and brachiopods. So while isotope data is speculative (even with spinosaur association with fish being very strong, we remain concerned over isotope data indicating a marine piscivorous diet) we use other data to infer habitus. This is the case with dsungs.
In other words, Isotopes can't be used alone for determining habitats and isotope analysis might be unreliable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TarbosaurusBatar [2014-02-27 01:46:57 +0000 UTC]
Quite the face you have there sir Pterosaur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JWArtwork In reply to King-Edmarka [2013-11-25 11:57:59 +0000 UTC]
You're most welcome, my friend, and yes, it looks nice. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PrimevalRaptor [2013-11-17 12:25:30 +0000 UTC]
Nice work on this one, seems accurate and the color scheme is pretty nice. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Archipithecus [2013-11-17 07:41:19 +0000 UTC]
I think this is in the running for oddest pterosaur of all time. Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Giga-fan123 [2013-11-17 01:33:27 +0000 UTC]
Very professional! love the colors!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bhut [2013-11-17 00:54:11 +0000 UTC]
It looks rather cheerful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1