HOME | DD
KiRAWRa — Aywas RCC: Jurassic
#artwork #bare #bird #chicken #digital #dino #dinosaur #draw #drawing #dromaeosaur #fallen #feather #feathered #featherless #hollywood #jurassic #kingdom #naked #nakey #park #pet #petsite #photoshop #pluck #plucked #raptor #rcc #sad #skin #velociraptor #virtual #vps #world #aywas #kirawra #2 #art #inaccurate
Published: 2018-06-14 08:30:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 15040; Favourites: 565; Downloads: 16
Redirect to original
Description
OH BOY JURASSIC WORLD 2 COMES OUT THIS MONTH, LET'S CELEBRATE WITH SOME GOOD OLD FASHIONED SCIENCE-SHUNNING """DINOSAURS"""Remember kids, accuracy sucks and nature isn't cool unless it roars
Who needs research when you can have HOLLYWOOD
-------
Aywas RCC for the month of June. I cackled to myself the whole way through drawing this. Aros (#4353) actually one-upped me by editing it back into a JP-style "raptor" seen [here ] hahaha!
Decided to try switching up the format from how I usually display these.
Etsy | Tumblr | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
Commissions | DeviantArt | FurAffinity | Weasyl
Related content
Comments: 107
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I feel like the original JP trilogy gets a pass especially the original film. The JW ones on the other hand, while keeping the iconic designs are not being accurate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yes, but the scene in the first JW when Rexy smashes through the Spinosaurus skeleton and roars is AWESOME
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I really don't care, I still LOVE the JP dinosaurs, but I kinda agree with the JW thing you keep telling other people in the comments. I LOVE accurate dinosaurs but JP really did change our perception of dinosaurs
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The lack of feathers didn't offend me as much as what happened to Stegosaurus. First they broke its tail so it would be droopy, now they replaced its beak with lips?
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
Seems the JW scientists really favored an 80's style dino resurrection!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So I'm not the only one who hates the later JP movies (especially JW movies) for making excuses such as having malnourished dragon lizards labeled as " Genetically modified dinosaurs"? Either make the animals relatively accurate, or don't label them as dinosaurs. I know the description was satirical, but still.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm I really the only person who love accurate and jp dinosaur. And can still enjoy a jp movie with still knowing that they are still inaccurate and act like monster. No disrespect this still your opinion and you did a good job with your art. I'm sorry if this sound mean
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
You are not the only one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You are not the only one ^^
I love dinos by all my bones, I love paleontology, I love documents and books about how they probably realisically looked like. But I also enjoy movies like JP, JW or Dinosaurus, Walking with Dinosaurs etc ... and I enjoy it despite the fact they are stylised and I know they are. Hey, like if in movies ever been a 100% accuracy in anything where gravity, physics, guns, animals act differently than in real in an exchange for enjoyment of viewers.
So I cannot start an argument with someone who thinks JP/JW is a bad example for people who may think this is how it was in real.
Like if there is anyone who knows how dinosaurs really looked like. So why the hate everywhere
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lol this makes me sad, but I love him so much. I think it would be cool to have a movie or game (seperate from JW or JP just because they came up with the splicing idea) with accurate dinosaurs! Id watch or play the HECC outta that. Im sure it could do well too lmao.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Have you heard of the game Saurian ? It's the world's most accurate dinosaur simulation! It's still being worked on, but the kickstarter was very successful and it puts out updates regularly.
Also, since JW Evolution just came out, try this other (way more accurate) park building game called Prehistoric Kingdom . This one is also pre-alpha from kickstarter and still being worked on, but has a demo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh wow I cant believe i havent heard of these sooner! tysm :3 Im totally checking these out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh let me throw one more at you! Recently I've been really into playing a game called The Isle . I didn't recommend it earlier because it has a lot of terrible reviews, has been in development for over 2 years, and for a long time seemed to just be a glitchy, forgotten project. Recently though, updates have picked up and it has run very well on my computer. As long as you find a friendly server to play on, it can be really fun. It isn't the most accurate when it comes to the dinosaurs (for example, the Utahraptors are completely featherless) but you can play as a lot of other underrepresented dinos such as Diabloceratops, Herrerasaurus, Psittacosaurus, and Therizinosaurus just to name a few!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Have you tried the movie Walking With Dinosaurs then?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Never heard of it, I shall be looking it up, thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You folks are taking the joke waaaaay to seriously. Nice pic by the way~!
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
Looks like I made some folks angry, lol!
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know right? Peeps need to chill already-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I hate how people think they looked with feathers, pretty stupid looking with zero style.
Jokes aside, Jurassic Park started it all. No one has the right to disrespect it because they think they know better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jurassic Park was a great contributor to changing the public's perception of dinosaurs from sluggish reptiles to active, intelligent, warm-blooded animals and even drove a lot of people into paleontology fields. That said, it still left a lot to be desired in the realm of realism, especially since feathered reconstructions of dinosaurs go back as far as 1876. Even having the paleontologist Jack Horner as their dinosaur consultant didn't stop them from inserting known anatomical inaccuracies into their dinosaur models.
I'm willing to let JP slide, but with the wave of fossilized feather evidence and scientific understanding about dinosaurs that has emurged since the 1990's, the JW franchise really has no excuse to continue pretending their films are about "dinosaurs".
The JW reboot is creating animals that are so anatomically broken [they may not even have a brain case ] and then pretending all the problems get erased by throwing the words "genetically altered" at them.
Saying they are "genetically altered" is a cop-out that doesn't explain half of their anatomical failings. Claiming they are "monsters" and "not really dinosaurs anyway" ignores the fact that the entire franchise is built on the selling point of being about dinosaurs, calling them dinosaurs, and labeling their inaccurate creatures with the scientific names of dinosaur species.
When a franchise as big as JW is the only representation of these animals that many of the general public will ever see or experience, it's justified to want to hold them up to a higher standard. It's justifiable to critique them, which is different than "disrespecting" them, I might add (though how one could "disrespect" a billion dollar franchise is beyond me).
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
It wasn't born as a billion dollar franchise.
It started as an idea between creative artists who ever doubted they could do shit.
At this point, you sir are not only pissing on a legacy, but as just an asshole.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Guys chill. listen to some Casiopea, drink some iced tea. Something that isn't bickering about what giant lizards look like in a movie.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
Why is it oddly cute?
I really wanna hug it.. I don't know why.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think it'd appreciate a hug! ♥
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*Squeezes and makes sure you don't literally bite off my head*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The drawing is cool
Not here to judge but...
How people still didn't get what they were saying since Jurassic Park 1 that those dinosaurs are NOT ACCURATE because they had to fill the rest of the DNA by modern lizards?? Even in Jurassic World they literarly say if they had 100% DNA those dinosaurs would look much different.
And second, it's ment to be a sci-fi horror, not a dinosaur documentary. Stylisation was intencional, not because of lack of study. It's the same reason why such calm and people flesh uninterested animals like sharks are bloodthirsty savage beasts in shark horrors ^^
Please people, stop judging that golden Spielberg's piece just because you didn't understand the right concept
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The issues with Jurassic Park and Jurassic World is not just about hybridization and artistic flair. Personally, I think hybridizing dinosaurs is a pretty cool plot point. If you look at my gallery, a lot of my art has to do with splicing animals together - I'm obviously a fan of the concept. Despite the anatomical shortcomings, the original JP film did a lot of good for shifting the public's perception of dinosaurs to be more like warm-blooded, intelligent, active bird relatives instead of the old sluggish, cold-blooded reptiles.
The thing is, we have learned a LOT about dinosaurs since the 1990's, and instead of taking inspiration from our scientific advancements, Jurassic World instead gives us outdated, anatomically broken, emaciated monstrocities and pretends throwing the words "genetically altered" at them makes all the problems go away. And I'm not just talking about the problem of feathers, I'm talking anatomy so bad that these creatures [don't have a brain case ] and being so badly emaciated that you can see the outline of their skulls. These creatures are so badly constructed that they simply shouldn't function at a biological level. You can't just create nostalgia-based hybridized fantasy animals and then still market your whole franchise as being about dinosaurs.
Filling missing gaps in DNA with frogs and other animals doesn't suddenly mean that biology works any way that you want it to. If they are creating hybridized monsters, they shouldn't be naming them after dinosaur species. They are making outdated, lazy dinosaurs based more on nostalgia than science. When a franchise as big as this is the only representation of these animals that many of the general public will ever see or experience, it's justified to want to hold them up to a higher standard.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hmm I wonder what a dinosaur tastes like
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This just in: King Kong was unrealistically large, for an ape.
Another shocker: Pennywise isn't an accurate representation of intangible cosmic entities, or clowns.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
Hey guess what, if you want to go see an accurate representation of an ape you can go on down to your local zoo, watch a documentary, or flip through a picture book if you wanted. Hell if you're adventurous, you can take a trip down to Africa and study them in the wild with your own two eyes.
Unfortunately, we don't have that luxury for dinosaurs, so when the biggest representation that the mass public gets of these creatures is some outdated fantasy monsters pretending to be "dinosaurs", it matters.
The original JP films did a lot in the public eye of turning dinosaurs into active, intelligent, warmblooded bird relatives, but with all of the advancements we've made in that field of study since the 1990's, the JW reboot is actively regressing those advancements by creating animals that are so anatomically broken [they may not even have a brain case ] and then pretending all the problems get erased by throwing the words "genetically altered" at them.
Saying they are "genetically altered" is a cop-out that doesn't explain half of their anatomical failings. Claiming they are "monsters" and "not really dinosaurs anyway" ignores the fact that the entire franchise is built on the selling point of being about dinosaurs, calling them dinosaurs, and labeling their inaccurate creatures with the scientific names of dinosaur species.
Jurassic World is not making giant apes or scary clowns that can be easily refuted by living, active, popular, real-life accurate representation. They are making outdated, lazy dinosaurs based more on nostalgia than science. When a franchise as big as this is the only representation of these animals that many of the general public will ever see or experience, it's justified to want to hold them up to a higher standard. Especially considering how groundbreaking the original JP film was, and how much it contributed to the field of paleontology.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hits the nail right in the head.
If i want Scientific accuracy, i'll go and watch a documentary. i paid to see reptilian monsters not fluffy ancient turkey
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I can imagine having all your feathers ripped out would hurt!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Is that what happened? Poor thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Quick, somebody get him a blanket!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aww, it looks so self-conscious about molting! Poor thing, it ought to have a sweater.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I can see it now-
"Jurassic Parkas"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>