Comments: 28
BingyBongo [2023-07-09 10:01:46 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Alan-the-leopard [2019-08-15 06:51:12 +0000 UTC]
Interesante wissenschaftliche Studie.
Ich bin kein Biologe, aber ich glaube, dass der Kopf des Smilodons etwa wie die Zeichnung in der Mitte der erster Reihe war, wenn wir an moderner große Katzen denken...
Ich glaube, dass der Kaugummi den Oberkiefer etwas mehr als ,,die Wurzel" des großes Fanges und rund halb die kleiner Vorderzähne bedeckt (der Kaugummi ist genauso wichtig für alle Zähne, oder? ^^).
In Bezug auf die Lippen, Ich zustimme auch, dass die Oberlippe der ganzer Oberkaugummi bedeckt, da wenn ich mich nicht irre, es keines Säugetier gibt, das der ganzer Kaugummi vorführt (Wurzel des großen Reißzahns enthalten), sogar wenn der Mund geschlossen ist, oder?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brutonyx [2019-08-14 15:46:57 +0000 UTC]
The fact is, the lipped model requires a level of soft-tissue lippage which not only opposes the feline EPB, but would be unprecedented among any living mammal. How would lips of that size actually function? It's difficult to imagine how the obicularis oris would work in this model: this would be enormous, dropping ring of muscle around the mouth, and I'm not sure how it could be cleared from the teeth when biting and feeding, assuming normal principles of mammalian face musculature. It's possible that Smilodon had a unique facial myology of course, although the consistency of face muscles across mammals argues for this being unlikely. Such muscles controlling the lip would need to be very large, and it would be expected to see some indication of this on the skull itself as we do in other mammals with sophisticated facial soft-tissues (like trunks and proboscides). Generations of people who know carnivoran anatomy very well have pored over machairodont skulls and never commented on such features.
Regarding a lower lip coverage in particular, it must be noted that most carnivorous mammals hava very large, fleshy upper lips over thinner, tightly-bound soft tissues of the lower jaw, so unless Smilodon and kin had lip anatomy completely unlike their modern relatives, their canine teeth must have been exposed (Witton 2018). Of course there's the exception of the clouded leopard, which sheaths a long set of canines in its lower jaw, but they're not even close to the size of Smilodon's sabers.
Regarding canine configuration, while it's likely that Smilodon canine function lacks exact modern functional analogues, the sabre teeth of tusked deer are not too far off in terms of physical demand (being routinely used in aggressive, tissue-tearing fights that leave victims scarred and wounded) and anatomy (thin layers of enamel over much of the tooth - Smilodon canines are not thickly enamelled), and still these animals have them exposed.
As a general rule, especially long teeth which project a considerable distance from the margins of the skull and lower jaw should be considered strong candidates for permanent exposure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kiwano0 In reply to Brutonyx [2019-08-14 16:33:19 +0000 UTC]
I have no idea how lips that size should function As far as I know, lips of that size are highly impractical and therefore no wild animal exists with such an appearance. Only human made and bred dogs show this trait, but they suffer from many infections and they don't have large sabers like the Smilodon.
That's a good point. Indeed, Smilodon would needa large set of muscles around his head and face and the skull would show that. I agree with you, Smilodons have been studied for ages and no scientist made a statement that Smilodons had those "bulldog lips".
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Kiwano0 In reply to OGYungLilBig [2019-08-27 16:29:40 +0000 UTC]
I know. In fact, I'm not a fan of the "bulldog" lip theory and I still don't accept that theory unless it gets a scientifical verification. I just wanted to take a neutral look at it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brutonyx In reply to Kiwano0 [2019-08-14 19:04:15 +0000 UTC]
Also Miller (1969) already proposed that Smilodon would have evolved a long lip line, reaching much farther back than that of modern cats-an adaptation that, in Miller's view, would have allowed the animal to achieve the large gapes necessary in order to bite with the sabers.
However, in modern cats, the posterior border of the lip line while in a relaxed position is slightly anterior to the anterior fibers of the masseter muscle. Considering that living felids are the extant sister group to the extinct subfamily Machairodontinae, it seems safe on phylogenetic grounds to transfer the observed relationships between bone and soft tissue to the fossil species, but that inference would be even more robust if the same relationships existed in the outgroup. We can choose as our outgroup the next closest relative of machairodontines, which might be either the viverrids or the hyenids. The choice would make no difference in this case, because in both families the examined features are the same as in cats-in fact, the same condition is observed in all modern members of the order Carnivora.
The idea that a longer mouth aperture was necessary to provide for large gapes revealed a limited observation of modern animals. Hippos and, to a lesser degree, peccaries oper their mouths to enormous gapes (well beyond 100 degrees, in the case of hippos) in order to display their canines, but they have "normal" mouth apertures that never reach behind the anterior margin of the masseter-the tissues of the mouth walls are simply more flexible than we tend to imagine. Even lions or tigers, when yawning with their jaws at gapes of around 70 degrees (a point where one would think that their mouth walls are as stretched as can be), can pull their lips back to bare their teeth in a grimacing gesture, showing that their stretching ability is far from having reached its limit (Antón 2013).
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Kiwano0 In reply to Brutonyx [2019-08-15 16:40:39 +0000 UTC]
That was really interesting to read, thanks a lot
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brutonyx In reply to Kiwano0 [2019-08-15 21:18:13 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome 😁
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Brutonyx In reply to Tacimur [2019-08-16 09:18:58 +0000 UTC]
Yeah since Nash's blogposts this has become a sort of paleoart meme, reappearing every now and then, however Nash himself has abandoned this idea after a discussion with Witton in the comment section of one of Witton's blogposts, from which I took the majority of the informations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IsaPaints777 [2019-08-14 13:28:53 +0000 UTC]
Interesting study! Ive always wanted to try to study anatomy, its very complex yet super fun to get into
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kiwano0 In reply to IsaPaints777 [2019-08-14 14:27:08 +0000 UTC]
Thank you
It sure is complex, but it's a lot fun to do all the scientific researches ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mr-Scarlet-Nokitsune [2019-08-14 10:58:00 +0000 UTC]
Due to fights the little tooth skin would get infected, watching felines and canines fight, they smack the face, and that could make the tooth just jut through and blood galore, much like lions where the fang gets stuck in flesh or hooked upon something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kiwano0 In reply to Mr-Scarlet-Nokitsune [2019-08-14 11:37:47 +0000 UTC]
You mean the permanent "pouch" on the chin? Yes, I agree, if the pouch is permanent, the risk that it gets ripped during fights is quite high. This would cause again infections. If the pouch gets ripped of completely, the tooth doesn't has a protection from the elements anymore. So the tooth still needed a protection on its own like an additional layer or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheHelleri [2019-08-14 09:30:17 +0000 UTC]
I'm thinking it may have been baboon-like. Where the lip contracts back an amazing amount to unsheath it's teeth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheHelleri In reply to Kiwano0 [2019-08-14 15:54:38 +0000 UTC]
Regarding the drawing. There seems to be a slight height difference between the upper when it is open as apposed to when it is closed. It's like the drawing is fighting the will a bit. I'm thinking perhaps include a bit more of the neck so you can start the head off with more of an upward tilt. Then you will be able to only perturb the lower jaw. That's something I found useful for drawing striking snakes. Should help here as well I think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0