Comments: 30
ReicheL12 [2012-03-08 13:55:36 +0000 UTC]
so perfect!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Botboy41 [2011-01-12 22:33:07 +0000 UTC]
I can't Help but think thnis while looking at this exellent Pic
"First, distract target,Then block his blind jab, counter with cross to left cheek. Discombobulate. Dazed, will attempt wild haymaker. Employ elbow block, and body shot. Block feral left, weaken right jaw, now fracture. Break cracked ribs, traumatize solar plexus, dislocate jaw entirely. Heel kick to diaphragm.In summary: ears ringing, jaw fractured, three ribs cracked, four broken, diaphragm haemmorraging. Physical recovery: six weeks. Full psychological recovery: six months."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sherlockart [2010-06-16 11:23:41 +0000 UTC]
this is really something
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MigraineSky [2010-02-14 17:37:15 +0000 UTC]
good work! nice strong contrast...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to patzo3000 [2010-04-07 00:14:43 +0000 UTC]
I can think of much better Moriarty's. I was slightly depressed with the overly generous amount of Adler/Holmes, as well as the fact that they didn't have holmes actually *PLAYING* the violin at all. I thought it was a little too choppy, in the fact that they would show something or a style twice early in the film(like thinking through before the reality with holmes) then never show it again in the rest of the film.
8.4/5 outta 10 for me. Because of 1 the credits (art fancy luv), and 2 RDJ and JL are adorable together, and they were quite fantastic.
I hope they get more canonical in the sequel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Myrrddin [2009-12-29 19:28:10 +0000 UTC]
Wow. This makes me want to go draw Holmes and Watson from the new movie too. You make pencil look like charcoal. I am amazed. Well done.
I agree about Irene Adler not needing to be in the movie. And I don't remember her ever being a thief, but anyway.
D: Am I the only one who hates those silly glasses of his though?
Again, good job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to Myrrddin [2009-12-29 22:33:34 +0000 UTC]
she was a bit of a thief
I luv those glasses haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Myrrddin In reply to KKzStudios [2009-12-29 23:07:55 +0000 UTC]
Really? Hmm. I guess I'll have to go re-read it then.
They're so...circular. ^^ But ah well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RecordRewind [2009-12-27 22:37:55 +0000 UTC]
I've seen Sherlock Holmes yesterday... and I must say it exceeded my expectations, it was really good! This drawing is awesome ^__^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to RecordRewind [2009-12-27 23:58:47 +0000 UTC]
thank you, yeah the movie exceeded mine as well just cuz I had been reading all these things about it being bad >>;
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RecordRewind In reply to KKzStudios [2009-12-28 10:25:24 +0000 UTC]
Really? I haven't read reviews before watching it, I just heard people complaining about it being an "action" movie and all that jazz, which I personally don't care for.
Only complaining point for me was how Irene Adler suddenly turned into a "damsel in distress" half the movie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to RecordRewind [2009-12-28 15:34:22 +0000 UTC]
personally i didn't think she needed to be in the film at all but i'm being stubborn on that point
also that extremely long explosion scene after Watson trips the wire...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to RecordRewind [2009-12-29 03:15:45 +0000 UTC]
I saw it again, 45 seconds of explosion... coulda been acomplished in 20 seconds max
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZombiesILove [2009-11-19 02:10:11 +0000 UTC]
Wow, good golly that's great
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gigabytemon [2009-11-17 10:08:32 +0000 UTC]
You, and my hat is off, are a professional.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gigabytemon In reply to KKzStudios [2009-11-18 03:03:50 +0000 UTC]
Thanks...?
THANKS!?
THAT'S IT!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to gigabytemon [2009-11-18 04:51:00 +0000 UTC]
... your forgetting the x3 part!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TGunnor [2009-11-17 05:09:40 +0000 UTC]
Oh man, that movie isn't coming out soon enough!
Awesome drawing. Love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KKzStudios In reply to TGunnor [2009-11-17 17:05:59 +0000 UTC]
i know, im so excited...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0