Comments: 11
akaRoger [2012-11-29 07:22:43 +0000 UTC]
I think it's rather successful, and I like that you took the noise and ran with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KrisVlad In reply to akaRoger [2012-11-29 17:01:44 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Roger, I appreciate it. It's still my favorite shot of my wife. There's just something surreal about it... idk.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KrisVlad In reply to SageFillyLuna [2012-11-29 01:20:40 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! That's what I was hoping people would say. It's that "I have a crappy film camera" old school vintage look lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lior-Art [2012-11-28 20:04:24 +0000 UTC]
Why not making your camera in Raw output?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KrisVlad In reply to Lior-Art [2012-11-28 22:31:40 +0000 UTC]
Good suggestion. Next time I'm in a similiar predicament, I'll try to change the output and compare the two.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lior-Art In reply to KrisVlad [2012-11-29 06:35:56 +0000 UTC]
You'll have to postwork with photoshop ... decrease "details"...
You have many tutorials in google explaining this [link] [link]
....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KrisVlad In reply to Lior-Art [2012-11-29 16:53:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I appreciate it. I tried noise reduction, but it took all detail out of her face. The shot looked unfocused, that's why I went with noise augmentation instead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KrisVlad In reply to Lior-Art [2012-11-29 21:59:15 +0000 UTC]
Oh yeah, I already tried. That's why I decided to increase the noise instead.
[link]
See? It looks bad once you reduce the noise. The detail in her face is gone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0