HOME | DD
KukuruyoArt — Gamergate life 22
by-nc-nd
#wikipedia #vivianjames #gamergate #liliamwoods
Published: 2015-01-30 15:32:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 7272; Favourites: 100; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
There has been an intense war the recent month on wikipedia over the Gamergate controversy article (did you know that Gamergate is a kind of ant? one never knows enought), editors with a pro-GG or neutral stance have being denouncing how the anti and SJW editors keep modifing the article (and several other feminist articles) so instead of a neutral exposition on the Gamergate happening, the article has become a biased and dishonest misrepresentation of the movement. I never considered wikipedia as a reliable source of information, but since Gamergate i consider it the opposite of a reliable source, i have even see articles speaking about money been given to editors to change things, ugh…
But some light begins to show in the horizon, aparently several editors are being investigated, and maybe banished from wiki for their behaviour over Gamergate and feminist articles, and one that has already being kicked out is infamous editor Ryulong theralphretort.com/lol-sjw-thu…
Let’s hope this means the Gamergate article will be changed to a more neutral and informative stance.
kukuruyo.com
Commissions: kukuruyoart.deviantart.com/jou…
--------
Versión en castellano: kukuruyo.com/comic/gamergate-l…
Related content
Comments: 32
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Police man: Not without a licence you drunken buffoon!!!!
Police man 2: I hate this job now
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
maybe this will sound weird, but the girl is kinda cute. On topic, I agree with everything here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Was... that a futurama reference? I mean, there's bender, and she said 'with black jack and hookers.'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bender knows an opportunity when he sees one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So youre saying Wikipedia is biased in favor of GG Haters, yet show a GG Hater getting kicked out from Wikipedia?
Does not compute.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wikipedia doesn't care about GG, what they do care about is their editors telling lies and forcing articles to tell lies just because they don't like the truth. The people changing articles to say what they want just happened to do that to the GG article as well (unbelievable, I know) so the people making the GG article anti-GG are getting thrown out of Wikipedia for changing articles to be pro or anti to push their agendas
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah I know, on the whole, wikipedia has gotten despotic-like with their admins basically wanting to own whats being said on some articles.
Lets go back to the early days of wikipedia, when blatant vandalizations were the order of the day. Libertarianism yo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
good that bender was there. I had a hard time trying to remember were that phrase comes from
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The only criticism I could make about those plans for a new site is that RationalWiki already exists as the partisan echo chamber indifferent to facts
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tfw some anti gamer used rational wiki as evidence that gamergate is a harassment campaign
That is the best they've got huh?
We've already won the hearts N minds of neutrals so that's good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love this, but I do not think that they would say "blackjack and hookers". They would probably find that misogynistic, degrading, and immoral.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It is true. It is very hypocritical that a woman feel lust for another woman. Especially if she declared feminist. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i have used this joke so much "well build our own gaming sites with black jack and hookers XD"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
A radical feminist who wants to build an establishment with hookers, I love the way your mind works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Blackjack and Hookers?
But I thought that was Triggering Opressive Tools of the Gamergate Patriarchy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yep, as it stands, it's still heavily Feminsit biased as it considered not your sehild to be sockpuppets.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I look at Wikipedia with sceptic eyes, but it's fun as fast read about a particular subject.
Read a bit about GG when you introduced me to the basics. RationalWiki.org is quite against you guys, hehe.
I prefer to stay out of these conflicts. And I live in Greenland, so the only way to hear about these is through the net.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Aye, did a little look into "Rational"Wiki's article. They blame GamerGate for Anita's Utah threat. Their one source? An article that simply says "Anita received a threat, here's what it said, here's what police/FBI said" and noted that she'd received threats before. Not one mention of games, gamers, GamerGate, or anything of the sort. Yet the wiki uses this as "cited evidence" that GamerGate is responsible.
It's literally shit-tier quality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow.
Is RationalWiki already grasping at straws?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
>already
>implying they haven't done this since their inception
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, it's a notorious problem when pages like Encyclopedia dramatica or Know your meme do a better job on neutrality than wikipedia xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wikipedia says Gamergate did this and Gamergate did that and says nothing about the opposition.
Wikipedia quote: Sarkeesian said she believes women are being targeted because they are "challenging the status quo of gaming as a male-dominated space."
Male-dominated space? Lara Croft, Samus Aran, Bayonetta and YRP disagrees with her, hehe. And that's just at the top of my head.
Developers? No clue, since I don't care about who makes the games, just the games themselves.
And I like to think that I'm your ordinary gamer
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wikipedia has always been notoriously biased. They themselves outright admit that they do not care about accuracy, only "verifiability".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That's a step but Jimmy Wales, the Co-Founder of Wikipedia, is still a problem.
He apparently held a neutral position when all this started but then suddenly sided with anti-gamergate when someone posted an article which documented corrupt wikipedia editors.
Wales described the article as a hitlist but concern was raised when the article consisted of documentation of illegal (or, at the very least, immoral) acts, such as editors accepting bribes to edit, or undo edits of, Wikipedia articles, and no action was taken against this by Wikipedia staff at the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
