HOME | DD
Kuwaizair — canine according to sparklekid
by-nc-sa
Published: 2009-10-17 01:31:39 +0000 UTC; Views: 7107; Favourites: 118; Downloads: 36
Redirect to original
Description
it was going to be all the same thing so its not as mean as i wanted. the next one willso this can serve as a guide on how to 'let people know the big fat fluffy ones are wolves" if you do that
*edit 11/1/09*
wow guys. I'm just so..suprized this is popular.
yay
Related content
Comments: 70
You forgot that they draw their cats the same as the dogs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that is the seqeual, animals according to sparklekids. and that one will also count as "they assume the zoolologial world ends at________________. And list lion, wolf, dog, cat, horse and few other animals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
one day i saw a Sparkle serval... and it didn't look like a cat. I dont think they can draw anything outside of a dog. even if they do call it "cat"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Amazingly it's mostly pointed eared canines. I thought sparkle 'dog' mean't all breeds? Pointed, floppy eared, etc. Also not all canines have wolf type snouts and heads. Different muzzles sizes and heads as well. Wolves have swept everyone into denial..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't see a lot of floppy ear Sparkle dogs. people forget more than Spitz and German Shepard Dog exist.
there maybe a poodle now and then, or something labeled a Pekineses, but it will have erect teddybear ears.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes, mainly dogs that 'resemble wolves'. kinda sad, why not all breeds?
And yes every now and then a poodle or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The legs on the jackal... how do they support its body... xD
Sparkleanimals make not much sense. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ilu. o n o
i'm probally no better, having sparkle dogs and all.
it just scares me when people draw a dog..and honest to god think its a cat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm so glad somebody made this, it really needed to be said.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i know, sad thing is its one of the most popular thing I did.
I was so close to not altering any of them, just keeping them pure.
I don't need a husky/malamute because "generic shape" covers that, and "dog' to some denotes labs and collies. this dog is a classic mongrel
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Funny how that works, isn't it? On my normal account my most favorited deviation is something I put very little time into and frankly can't stand to look at anymore...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i roll my eyes and wonder everyday.
i made sparkle-hate that is good sparkle-hate
(because its hateful hinder creativity by telling someone that blue,grey,black,hotpink,dark green,pumpkin orange, neon yellow, rainbow, silver, brown, lavender, royal purple, checkarbord don't look good on one dog-thing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cool.
I think one good way to study basic shape might be to study the taxidermy forms. there they 'animals' are plastic and furless.
mostly tailes and earless.
but at least you can get the subtle body shape
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah.
I draw canines, and though probably not 100% correct on their anatomy, I know that those in the canine family have different shapes.
(Like people who draw wolves and coyotes the same way, even though they seem to forget that coyotes have a slightly different face shape and less fur than wolves.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Though I'm not really a sparkledog hater, or anything, I still find this picture very funny XDDD. I mean, sparkleanimals are great, as long as people don't put too much color in one space, but it's a whole another story if you draw a dog with very weird bending bones XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
its just sometimes the people don't try to make the characters look like what they are.
"it is a cartoon", but the better Disney company movie's animals look like their species. Simba looked like a lion, not a tiger, puma or maine coon with short hair and bear ears
the brother bear grizzles looked like bears, the foxes in "the fox and the hound" looked like foxes, there are people who want to taken seriosly and repsected for drawing foxe's ears like this [link]
because VK 'started it"
its just, try harder to make something look like the species, these people don't. you only know it is a wolf if you are told so
[link]
realistic wolf
[link]
realisticish husky
[link]
husky?
[link]
husky
[link]
wolf
[link]
wolf
[link]
wolf
[link]
granted if some of these were drawn in 'not the artist's style' then it won't be distinguishable no? so if i had a dog comic where my poodles looked like komondors then it will be 'everyone knows my work"
[link]
fox..well their first fox
[link]
fox
[link]
fox
making a species look like its species kills creativity. if we all drew foxes to look like foxes, and not some kind of cat bodied, rabbit eared thing with a chihuahua's face then...
still i don't want to buy it
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Wow... Those really do fail.
You know, I don't mind the animals that are cartoony-realistic, if you know what I mean.
It's like... They're not hugely detailed, but still have the basic anatomy of whatever it is, maybe with a weird eye style or something.
Like the Lion King, they weren't aiming for detail, but rather for the basic shape.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
they are based on true finds I see skinny fox-husky things and they call it wolf
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow, these examples... I never seen such fail in trying to draw something like its species. Those foxes look like puppies 
But, yes, if we all drew wolves in those realistic kinds of ways, it would get a little bit too boring....
My suggestion is, if you draw a canine species like those three last ones, don't say it's a fox. It's an...uhrm... thing. But it's not really a fox. Foxes have way different anatomy and colors. It's a fantasy canine creature.
LOL sorry I'm not really good in debating and such.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i try to find the worst. someone here does do good foxes, but they keep the natural colors
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, I know few persons, too, and they really have nice art, but when I try to make original characters with those natural colors, I always feel like something's missing... Psychedelic colors don't hurt... much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wow, i don't get a lot of those..er well those comments on my serious work.
finally a satire that landed that critical hit!
maybe I'll make a sequel, only this time with faces/busts/profiles
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh?
I will make your day and go comment on some of your serious work, you deserve it!
YES, sequel!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
X'DDDDD Ive seen soo many stabs taken at Sparkledogs lately. Another funny one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is cool I love it. There are too many people out here that don't pay attention to anatomy, that don't even try to correct it. I know my anatomy sucks, but I at least try and get better. I hate seeing those people who keep drawing the same thing over and over and don't even try to improve.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love this. Lol.
I made Faux [my fursona, lol] especially chubby. She has ears that throw her off-balance and she walks funny because of fat. xD;
I hope she wouldn't be considered a sparkledog. xD;
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
is she 7 colors, 3 patterns, has glowing body parts or "paw pads that change color with mood" (omg part octopus?) lives in a non human-like word but wears trendy clothing and accessories like I-pods, facial piercings, tail bracelets, belts and so on?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OMG NO U GOT IT AAAALL RONG LUZER!!1ONE THE WULF IZ TU FAT!1
jokes aside..
lol this made my day xD So true.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
noo wolf is fatter, with poof and muscles.
I see little to no jackels so i guessed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Crazy colors is a meh-not-really-much-of-an-issue-usually thing, and the over-reactive super nuclear wolves comics are a bad thing, but making every canine a skinny-ass fox with a huge tail and long legs is a whole 'nother thing entirely. I'm not talking about Disney style or 'Ginga Legend' style or any other cartoony style - you could at least totally tell a dog from a wolf and a wolf from a fox in all of those. It's people who just want to copy the style but don't see the anatomy who are the problem, really. (Or those people who just like canines because everyone else is into it and could care less that such and such cruelty happens to the REAL wolves or stray dogs. >> )
Hopefully all those sparklekids grow out of that stage. :>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
using good colors wold be better too. its one thing to make a colorful character, if you know your color theroy and color wheel. Or even look to nature, and think like a graphic designer (i think the rule was 3 colors?)
but to put neon orange, baby girl pink, grass green, magenta, rainbow, black, white, lemon yellow, gradient crimson. is one thing.
OH mean I should edit to mention tatoos, you cannot tatoo fur! arg.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mmhmm, I could see that. Also if they were 'canineifying' an anime character that had like blue hair or green hair or something, that's understandable. But yes, there's a line between that and majorly over-the-top. (And I have seen that, believe me, with rainbow dogs that have blue spots and purple eyeshadow and green striped tails and...)
Oh, you know what? You need to mention earrings and other jewelry too. Because wolves totally can't pierce their ears, yet some people think their characters magically can, despite there being no humans to do it to them. Somehow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh those are so weird. why not just go and stick with custom MLP? I want to make JD from "Scrubs" but i'm not going to 'dog-if" him I'll just make a pony (and try to send it to the actor who played the character)
I thought I did mention accessories, like with Brother Bear, would it been better if those animals had jewelry? "totemwere spirit-furries" and 4 legged fursonas do, the only odd ball thing in TLK was when Timone dressed up. But that was a gag.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>