HOME | DD

Description
So I decided to shove some more ecology up your butt. Because why not. I'm a graduated ecologist, in case you didn't know. Also an amateur misanthrope. Nope, I cannot compete with the big boys.
So I've been trying to incorporate some environmentally-friendly or at least environmentally responsible habits in my everyday for quite so many years now. Little things like recycling, saving water and electricity, reusing stuff until it totally breaks and is really good for nothing anymore.... that kind of stuff. I keep using my brother's old computers since many years until they are really no good anymore - and then I give them to my father to use until they just explode XD Fuck the corporations that want you to keep buying stuff all the time. Fucking bastards are killing the planet for money, well I won't be a part of that if I can help it.

But anyway. At some point a friend of mine, who is in fact much more ecological than me, mentioned that really the most ecological thing you can ever do is to never have any children. And to my greatest joy I realized he's totally right. Why? Because there's far too many humans on this planet as it is and namely those humans cause all the environmental trouble with their numerous harmful activities. Whatever you're thinking, even just their sheer number IS a serious problem. Each and every one of them uses resources - those resources a small percent, like me, are trying to save more or less, but even those who turn it into their absolutely top-priority mission to be environmentally friendly (which I admit I have not) cannot escape the fact they still have needs and therefore consume resources. But think of it this way: you can put all your efforts into saving water and reusing stuff, but with all you can do you can never compensate all the water, electricity and all manner of other resources that your kids will use throughout their lifes because that's A LOT. However, if those kids never exist - then you've already saved more than you will ever in your life with any other methods.
Nah, this is pretty much me lying to you. My true reasons for taking that decision are personal and purely egoistic. However, the benefit from it for the environment - more like, the prevented harm - is fact, nevertheless. So it makes me a bit proud, too.

And of course, I'll also try to advertise that as a course of life for others as well, thus trying to aid the planet a little more. This is your very valid reason to never have children and be content with it - be ecological. Of course, many of you will now go off "but I want baaaabiiiiiiiieeees!" Oh for Hell's sake, don't be such a crybaby. Grow up. Have a life. Find a purpose for your existence other than polluting Earth with more resource-consuming humans. Procriate yourselves memetically, not genetically. That is to say, spread ideas instead of even more humans (it helps to have ideas to spread, for a start). But seriously, adopt. Or if you really find yourself so unable to suppress your primitive need to reproduce, have just one kid with your partner. That's still a step forward towards reducing the human burden upon the Earth. I'm not saying that (only) as a misanthrope - I say it as an environmentalist. Otherwise, believe me, your many children WILL suffer the consequences.

Anyway, I think I already earned myself enough curses for today. Wild antihuman propaganda can do that.

Also, all joking aside, it is worth noting one very serious thing here. Humans indulge themselves in "controlling" the population of other species, sometimes even daring to hide behind "environmental" reasons for that crime. However, they conveniently ignore the fact that when talking about impact over the environment, one species exceeds a million times each and every one of the rest - and that is the human itself. It is utterly disgusting, not to mention arrogant, immoral AND more often than not harmful to the environment, to "control" the population of other species while completely failing to control your own. I must also point out that talking about population control, I am referring to controlling your propagation - but make no mistake, the population control that you practice over other species is only done through murdering them. Not quite fair, is it?

Think green.
Feel free to use the stamp, just it if you do.

Description
So I decided to shove some more ecology up your butt. Because why not. I'm a graduated ecologist, in case you didn't know. Also an amateur misanthrope. Nope, I cannot compete with the big boys.
So I've been trying to incorporate some environmentally-friendly or at least environmentally responsible habits in my everyday for quite so many years now. Little things like recycling, saving water and electricity, reusing stuff until it totally breaks and is really good for nothing anymore.... that kind of stuff. I keep using my brother's old computers since many years until they are really no good anymore - and then I give them to my father to use until they just explode XD Fuck the corporations that want you to keep buying stuff all the time. Fucking bastards are killing the planet for money, well I won't be a part of that if I can help it.

But anyway. At some point a friend of mine, who is in fact much more ecological than me, mentioned that really the most ecological thing you can ever do is to never have any children. And to my greatest joy I realized he's totally right. Why? Because there's far too many humans on this planet as it is and namely those humans cause all the environmental trouble with their numerous harmful activities. Whatever you're thinking, even just their sheer number IS a serious problem. Each and every one of them uses resources - those resources a small percent, like me, are trying to save more or less, but even those who turn it into their absolutely top-priority mission to be environmentally friendly (which I admit I have not) cannot escape the fact they still have needs and therefore consume resources. But think of it this way: you can put all your efforts into saving water and reusing stuff, but with all you can do you can never compensate all the water, electricity and all manner of other resources that your kids will use throughout their lifes because that's A LOT. However, if those kids never exist - then you've already saved more than you will ever in your life with any other methods.
Nah, this is pretty much me lying to you. My true reasons for taking that decision are personal and purely egoistic. However, the benefit from it for the environment - more like, the prevented harm - is fact, nevertheless. So it makes me a bit proud, too.

And of course, I'll also try to advertise that as a course of life for others as well, thus trying to aid the planet a little more. This is your very valid reason to never have children and be content with it - be ecological. Of course, many of you will now go off "but I want baaaabiiiiiiiieeees!" Oh for Hell's sake, don't be such a crybaby. Grow up. Have a life. Find a purpose for your existence other than polluting Earth with more resource-consuming humans. Procriate yourselves memetically, not genetically. That is to say, spread ideas instead of even more humans (it helps to have ideas to spread, for a start). But seriously, adopt. Or if you really find yourself so unable to suppress your primitive need to reproduce, have just one kid with your partner. That's still a step forward towards reducing the human burden upon the Earth. I'm not saying that (only) as a misanthrope - I say it as an environmentalist. Otherwise, believe me, your many children WILL suffer the consequences.

Anyway, I think I already earned myself enough curses for today. Wild antihuman propaganda can do that.

Also, all joking aside, it is worth noting one very serious thing here. Humans indulge themselves in "controlling" the population of other species, sometimes even daring to hide behind "environmental" reasons for that crime. However, they conveniently ignore the fact that when talking about impact over the environment, one species exceeds a million times each and every one of the rest - and that is the human itself. It is utterly disgusting, not to mention arrogant, immoral AND more often than not harmful to the environment, to "control" the population of other species while completely failing to control your own. I must also point out that talking about population control, I am referring to controlling your propagation - but make no mistake, the population control that you practice over other species is only done through murdering them. Not quite fair, is it?

Think green.
Feel free to use the stamp, just it if you do.