HOME | DD

LASMN — Too Faced Cosmetics Campaign 1

Published: 2006-07-16 09:21:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 10519; Favourites: 148; Downloads: 807
Redirect to original
Description Image 1 of a series of surrealist beauty shots. This one features model South African model Lyndal.
Photographed at Smashbox Studios. Culver City, CA in Softbox. Light source - Elinchrom Octabank with multiple layers of diffusion. Powered by 2 Profoto Pro 7A generators and a bitube head. Camera - Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II.

Thanks to all at Too Faced, and above all... Sarah Haynes for your trust and belief.
Related content
Comments: 32

CoffeeFrame [2008-09-10 23:57:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh my god, it's Lyndal Jarvis from Metal Gear Solid 4?!!
I really appreciate the effort you put into explaining what technique you used, thank you for that.
May I ask how you can expose for her skin and still be able to get details on the black bed?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to CoffeeFrame [2008-09-17 05:37:10 +0000 UTC]

That's her. What is Metal Gear Solid 4? A game I'm guessing.

As for light shaping, we use various tools. In this case, strategically place flags.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CoffeeFrame In reply to LASMN [2008-09-17 11:33:20 +0000 UTC]

I see... So you need to think about what light hits what part of the scene
Thanks for the tips!

You're right about MGS4, and it's just one of the best games around! What they did was shooting in L.A [link] and then turn her into a character in the game [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

efarfan [2006-12-07 06:04:02 +0000 UTC]

a perfection in photography

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to efarfan [2006-12-11 00:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much. Spread the gospel!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Azyiu [2006-11-06 08:47:49 +0000 UTC]

Awesome shot!

I have a question, and please answer. I was taught that you should try to use the smallest f-stop available for portraits, but I see you stop down to F/22 for this shot. Yet, it looks beautiful. Please tell me or even teach me the reason for the use of F/22 instead of a smaller F stop, thanks in advance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

LASMN In reply to Azyiu [2008-09-17 05:22:38 +0000 UTC]

Whoever told you that... I don't know. I have no rules. Whatever looks good. This also isn't a portrait, but still...

If I shot the smallest F stop on that lens (1.2), 90% of the frame would be out of focus.

Thanks for the kind words.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LASMN In reply to Azyiu [2006-11-06 11:24:29 +0000 UTC]

The first rule is, there are no rules. One should go with what feels right, not what conventional wisdom would dictate. Photography "by the book" would be an awfully boring world. No shadows = no mood.

The reason for F22 here was, there was more story tell than simply a facial expression. I wanted the details of the background as well. All of it was important to me, so I wanted all of it in focus. That simple.

Sometimes it's F1.0, Sometimes it's F64.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Azyiu In reply to LASMN [2006-11-06 14:23:26 +0000 UTC]

That's true... I'd love to learn more from you as far as portraits is concerned.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stadam [2006-08-05 09:21:06 +0000 UTC]

Very well done. Glamorous photo and great composition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

neom [2006-07-24 16:43:17 +0000 UTC]

Great shot!! What lens?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

LASMN In reply to neom [2008-09-17 05:23:04 +0000 UTC]

70-200 2.8L IS

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LASMN In reply to neom [2006-07-24 20:20:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.
Canon EF-L 2.8 70-200

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrkenHeartsBleed [2006-07-20 02:02:35 +0000 UTC]

Lovely..something like that old Hollywood glamour but with a nice touch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

detune [2006-07-19 23:15:40 +0000 UTC]

Hey man, thats an awesome image but that thanks also for including the tech stuff too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saskara [2006-07-19 20:21:15 +0000 UTC]

reallu nice!! color, composition, nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

msjordach [2006-07-19 14:08:55 +0000 UTC]

now this is glamour right there!
the girl's skin looks so velvet... almost unreal... good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheRaven1988 [2006-07-19 08:29:04 +0000 UTC]

Great ad shot. I'm hoping to go into editoral and advertising photography myself some day. How did you get into it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to TheRaven1988 [2006-07-20 04:12:17 +0000 UTC]

Still trying to get into it. Only been at it a couple of years.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheRaven1988 In reply to LASMN [2006-07-20 08:41:58 +0000 UTC]

Ah well I've only been doing it for about 6 months, I got into it through a friend.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

petran [2006-07-18 02:32:00 +0000 UTC]


amazin job

very beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to petran [2006-07-18 02:50:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dye1337 [2006-07-18 01:55:55 +0000 UTC]

Great shot, especially saying a flash was used

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to dye1337 [2006-07-18 02:53:10 +0000 UTC]

A flash?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dye1337 In reply to LASMN [2006-07-18 03:00:23 +0000 UTC]

it looks a tad flashy, my bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to dye1337 [2006-07-18 03:11:11 +0000 UTC]

That's the plan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dye1337 In reply to LASMN [2006-07-18 03:36:01 +0000 UTC]

oh haha, well then you did a great job at it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZeldasTetra [2006-07-17 11:30:55 +0000 UTC]

yesss I just bought their makeup yesterday :]]]
orgasmic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to ZeldasTetra [2006-07-17 20:11:26 +0000 UTC]

Cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZeldasTetra In reply to LASMN [2006-07-17 20:13:11 +0000 UTC]

lol ya!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MarkGreenmantle [2006-07-16 09:34:27 +0000 UTC]

lovely work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LASMN In reply to MarkGreenmantle [2006-07-16 16:37:53 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0