HOME | DD
lauren-rabbit β Sacrifice
Published: 2007-08-27 18:13:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 2873; Favourites: 68; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
*Related content
Comments: 39
ooh, very nice, something about it is very attractive, I just can't put my finger on what it is though...still very lovely
π: 0 β©: 1
A surreal classic, very reminiscent of Dali and his melting clocks ;] Somehow every element in here makes sense, even though I couldn't say which one. Something about the composition makes me wanna paint this in acrylics or oil (and I've never worked with those media before!).
π: 0 β©: 0
Amazing!
All the elements are so very striking to the eye...
It makes me wonder...
Beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 1
nice pic! what's the purpose of those glasses there?
π: 0 β©: 1
they're part of the sacrifice.
π: 0 β©: 1
i also see that the clock is upside down... anything special with that?
π: 0 β©: 1
time out of joint?
π: 0 β©: 0
Ah, I'm getting better?
π: 0 β©: 0
Fantastic image, love the broken clock!
π: 0 β©: 1
used big hammer.
π: 0 β©: 1
That would've made an interesting photo!
π: 0 β©: 0
The lecture of the composition is great. That clock really attracted my attention, it reminds me DalΓ. I know that in your line of work you usually use these almost absence of color, but I felt strange when I saw the peacock feather without colors, I don't know why, it was just shocking
π: 0 β©: 1
some things disconcert when transferred to black and white. I recognize this and I do use it.
π: 0 β©: 1
I love to play with the colors in my works, I never thought about it before, it's interesting
π: 0 β©: 0
that's the best thing you could say.
π: 0 β©: 0
I broke it with a hammer.
π: 0 β©: 0
You know, the fun about these closet-shootings is that your work becomes almost two-dimensional, more like the composition of a painting than a still-live. It's an interesting experiment you have going here and I enjoy watching it
π: 0 β©: 2
Everything is 2 dimenional to me. I have this funky eye disease and I cannot see in three dimensions, everything is flat. 3-D has been described to me, but to me the whole world will always be a photograph.
π: 0 β©: 2
I see. It's funny, because I've always thought many of your photos show a lot of depth and make more use of the three-dimensional space than most still-lives.
π: 0 β©: 1
maybe because I'm not aware of it. In my experience things tend to go easier if you don't overthinkit.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, something like that.
π: 0 β©: 0
...so do you in fact want us to look at, or inside the photograph, if it is meant to be a two dimensional presence (I too love the clock 
π: 0 β©: 0
