HOME | DD

lauren-rabbit — conversation at the autopsy

Published: 2007-07-03 17:33:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 1881; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description julia providence & julia pain, each had heard of the other but only by name.
Related content
Comments: 26

GasolineXRainbow [2011-05-14 10:24:06 +0000 UTC]

i love this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to GasolineXRainbow [2011-05-28 00:01:21 +0000 UTC]

It's an older piece, several years now, but I still think it stands.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

perception-obscure [2007-10-07 06:01:25 +0000 UTC]

Hello, I featured this piece in my latest journal, which can be found here : [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to perception-obscure [2007-10-07 11:14:23 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ratafluke [2007-08-20 23:35:31 +0000 UTC]

A creepiness that I can't put into words.
Your style lends itself so well to this concept, since each print has its own character, making them unique and not just mirror images. Like a meeting of two women disconnected except for sharing their first name. Did you mirror it by pressing two photo papers against each other while developing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to Ratafluke [2007-08-21 01:34:46 +0000 UTC]

Actually took a much simpler route, I tore one sheet of paper in half and made two separate prints one of which the negative was flipped to reverse it.
I prefer to piece together separate prints as it gives you more options.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ratafluke In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-08-21 03:42:19 +0000 UTC]

Yea, flipping the negative is so much simpler. But the reversed one has a strange texture so I wondered.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to Ratafluke [2007-08-21 04:03:25 +0000 UTC]

I printed it while it was wet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ratafluke In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-08-21 05:29:29 +0000 UTC]

Doesn't it get wet anyway from the chemicals?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to Ratafluke [2007-08-21 13:08:36 +0000 UTC]

The print does but after a negative is fixed and washed it dries and hardens and you really don't want them wet after that. They should always be used dry. I usually pull one contact print with a wet negative pressed onto dry paper, which is where the pattern comes from. It's a little risky because a wet emulsion can easily scratch so you're not supposed to do it.
I tend to only make one because once my negs are dry I don't resoak them. Also you run the risk of getting gimmicky when you play with patterns and tricks like that, which is the reason I use them so seldom.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ratafluke In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-08-22 01:48:30 +0000 UTC]

Ah, the negative was wet! You have a large format camera, which means you can make contact prints and don't need this projector thingie to make prints, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to Ratafluke [2007-08-22 01:59:38 +0000 UTC]

right. for the past five years that has pretty much been the only thing I have shot. I was considering making my next project 35mm just to make sure I don't get stuck in a rut but I really prefer large format.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ratafluke In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-08-22 02:25:12 +0000 UTC]

Cameras with bellows are sexy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to Ratafluke [2007-08-22 23:22:40 +0000 UTC]

never thought of it that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ratafluke In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-08-24 06:47:49 +0000 UTC]

My own way of seeing them ;]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

markramstead [2007-07-05 02:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Sophisticated is right!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to markramstead [2007-07-05 09:59:20 +0000 UTC]

duh, yeah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markramstead In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-07-05 20:28:30 +0000 UTC]

Except for the duh part....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stars-burn [2007-07-04 02:21:54 +0000 UTC]

Intriguing comparisions...

Reminds me of 'spot the difference' but clearly more sophisticated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to stars-burn [2007-07-04 17:30:34 +0000 UTC]

'spot the difference'
That's a great idea for a series of diptychs! You should run with that.
Seriously.
I wish I had thought of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stars-burn In reply to lauren-rabbit [2007-07-05 04:10:48 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure you'd get more out of the idea than I would.

Feel free to use it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to stars-burn [2007-07-05 09:59:07 +0000 UTC]

cool. I may do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew [2007-07-03 23:43:34 +0000 UTC]

good stuff..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to lawrencew [2007-07-04 00:50:17 +0000 UTC]

this was fun.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YoungGod [2007-07-03 18:22:19 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful you do amazing work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lauren-rabbit In reply to YoungGod [2007-07-03 22:25:18 +0000 UTC]

I try.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0