Comments: 75
leothefox In reply to ??? [2021-10-27 10:09:53 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
aquiresville [2012-03-20 22:38:47 +0000 UTC]
Another brilliant drawing, I thoroughly enjoy your technique of painting the silhouette, then adding the white overtop, it yields very dramatic results; you are very adept at drawing light, when most of us struggle even with drawing shadow! Bravo! Fave'd.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to aquiresville [2012-03-21 07:23:29 +0000 UTC]
Hehe shadows tend to be harder for me, which is why I started the white on black pictures to start with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aquiresville In reply to leothefox [2012-03-21 10:18:08 +0000 UTC]
It's a fantastic technique and approach, my friend!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to Daniel-Storm [2012-03-19 22:20:04 +0000 UTC]
Yep, and then doing CGI stunts and fighting Peter Fonda.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daniel-Storm In reply to leothefox [2012-03-21 04:30:43 +0000 UTC]
He fights Peter Fonda? I did not know that.
I never did like him much. He was okay the first time i saw him in The Rock.
But he never did do much after that. And i only saw that movie because Sean Connery was in it.
And i like Ed Harris, too. But Cage just looks silly to me most of the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to Daniel-Storm [2012-03-21 07:21:29 +0000 UTC]
Cage used to make good movies, but after Next it was just a non-stop crapfest from him.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daniel-Storm In reply to leothefox [2012-03-21 21:44:54 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps he needs help in selecting screen plays?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to Daniel-Storm [2012-03-22 07:45:40 +0000 UTC]
Or something. Sometimes I think he keeps making the bad movies to feed an awful drug habit or something. Maybe he's secretly crazy, like Mel Gibson crossed with Tom Cruise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daniel-Storm In reply to leothefox [2012-03-28 19:25:48 +0000 UTC]
Oooohhh...Mel Gibson crossed with Tom Cruise! Not sure i would care to see that!
I have heard that Ricky Williams only played football because that was all he could do to legally make enough money to support his pot smoking.
Maybe that is Cage's problem, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LINCARD1000 [2012-03-19 18:27:07 +0000 UTC]
The use of a limited colour palette really makes this stand out. Stunning work, mate!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to Snow-katt [2012-03-18 07:02:14 +0000 UTC]
You can have next generation, its all yours *hugs tos*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-03-18 16:45:25 +0000 UTC]
*claims ds 9 too *
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-03-19 05:53:46 +0000 UTC]
what shall we do with voyager
and the movies ?
1 is dull
2 is the greates of all trek movies
3 is okay
4 is okay
5 sucks
6 is good
7 is okay
8 is mediocre
9 sucks monkey fuck
10 is not as bad as peopel say it is
11 is urgh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to Snow-katt [2012-03-19 09:18:44 +0000 UTC]
1 is slow, but its a fairly impressive production.
2 totally agree
3 is alright, it's just not 2
4 is a bullshit comedy
5 sucks, yeah
6 is alright, the tone is off though
7 is fairly meh, to me it felt like a long Next Generation episode
8 is far better than 4 thru 7
9 sucks bad
10 really just wants to be 2, but is in fact shit
11 I don't even want to count as a Star Trek movie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-03-22 09:18:52 +0000 UTC]
1 the corbomite manouver ? dont you mean the changeling ? ie the oen with nomad the living computer who thinks kirk is its creator
2 incroyable !
3 we agree again !
4 i always thought it was too easy if its so easy why its nto done more often ? only show that shoudl have easy time travel is doctor who
5 and more agreement this is getting scary
6 in the case of 5 this is not hard but 6 is still a decent movie
7 its a tng 2 parter with some padding but at least its entertaining to watch cant be said for 9
8 i dislike the time travel plot its just waaaaay too fucking easy and if the borg can tiem travel why didnt they do that from the start ? just too convient a plot device
9 is the absolute pits
10 no but id rather watch 10 then 9
11 some characters can be rebooted or replace either because they appear in onlya few movies ( spiderman ) or we are used to them being changed ( james bond the doctor ) tos star trek is not one of them
the shat is kirk
nimsy is spock
deforot is mccoy etc period !
anybody else is justa fucking pretender a wannabe
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
leothefox In reply to Snow-katt [2012-04-21 06:25:15 +0000 UTC]
Who do those cocks belong to? O o O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-04-21 06:36:55 +0000 UTC]
no idea
nor do i care really
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-04-21 08:29:58 +0000 UTC]
penors ?
i have no idea
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-04-21 08:38:35 +0000 UTC]
whast this talk about roosters ?
thats some fowl language
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snow-katt In reply to leothefox [2012-04-21 08:48:12 +0000 UTC]
i dont normally draw roosters
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>