Comments: 50
wysinwyg [2013-01-30 01:44:58 +0000 UTC]
This looks really awesome . Could be a tribute to the original sand-rider.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JOHNNEMO [2013-01-25 19:58:14 +0000 UTC]
what a great idea.... beautiful work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Uber-Stooge [2012-11-27 00:32:35 +0000 UTC]
Well done, thats the size I always imagined the great worm would be
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PlagueJester In reply to Uber-Stooge [2012-12-23 10:05:20 +0000 UTC]
That's actually much too small to be a sand worm of Dune. A baby one, to be sure. The sand worms of Arrakis can eat a harvester in one gulp. A harvester has a crew of almost 30. That thing's mouth isn't large enough for two men. Much less thirty and the giant machine they rode in on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uber-Stooge In reply to PlagueJester [2012-12-23 13:00:31 +0000 UTC]
Good point. Its a worm, just not an adult. It was always a bit of a stretch for me to believe the fremen could ride the giant makers using the hooks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PlagueJester In reply to Uber-Stooge [2012-12-23 23:46:00 +0000 UTC]
You know, I've wondered that too. How can something large enough to eat a Spice Harvester have its scales peeled back by a person with a hook? You'd think the scales would be much too heavy for them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uber-Stooge In reply to PlagueJester [2012-12-24 00:44:25 +0000 UTC]
I agree. The worm would be too large to even care its scale was pulled back a few inches even if it was possible. I loved the book but the Fremen just cound not tame the adult makers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PlagueJester In reply to Uber-Stooge [2012-12-24 02:33:38 +0000 UTC]
Ah yes, but with all of the other amazing things Frank Herbert put into that book, we must overlook such a small error.
Or maybe, there's something we're missing?
(Dun dun DUUN!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uber-Stooge In reply to PlagueJester [2012-12-24 12:42:47 +0000 UTC]
It was a minor detail and the whole concept of how it was done was a bit vague. It was just always a bit of a stretch for me. Not an error
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mast3rlinkx1 In reply to Uber-Stooge [2013-06-13 20:54:44 +0000 UTC]
I think it's likely that the Fremen spent hundreds of thousands of years riding the worms, to the point where they might have shared some sort of psychic link with the worms. The book is very clear that psychic potential exists within the setting, so who's to say that the Fremen don't have some sort of mental link with the worms? If that were the case, the hooks would merely be for holding onto the worm, or possibly a way for the worm to know one of the Fremen were there.
As Uber says, the actual method of maker-riding was left pretty vague. There are many possible explanations as to how the riding is possible, though few of the plausible ones directly involve the hooks as anything but ways of hanging onto the worm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uber-Stooge In reply to mast3rlinkx1 [2013-06-14 00:36:34 +0000 UTC]
Hooks work as long as we believe they work, I just wish Herbert came up with a better idea then this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Reinc01 [2012-02-26 16:31:22 +0000 UTC]
Rides such a small worm. What a rookie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ososhi [2011-12-04 01:51:01 +0000 UTC]
Nice! The first 3 books are the best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PlagueJester In reply to Ososhi [2012-12-23 10:05:56 +0000 UTC]
I thought the books stopped being worth reading after the first. Second and on are awful. Though I do like the prequel books (so far) by his son.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fallout152 [2011-08-04 19:06:23 +0000 UTC]
awesome, I like the game
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GalaxyWing [2011-02-15 04:10:59 +0000 UTC]
KIDDING...<_<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GalaxyWing [2011-02-14 15:32:57 +0000 UTC]
.....It looks like a freaking dick. l:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GLC19 [2010-12-04 19:35:56 +0000 UTC]
exaactly as my mind when I read the book!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WhiteRavenX [2010-09-26 11:06:31 +0000 UTC]
Love the many moons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Harzlek [2010-09-26 05:12:25 +0000 UTC]
That is an extremely small sandworm. About the size of one they would use for the making of the water they use for preseisnce(spelled wrong).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PlagueJester In reply to Harzlek [2012-12-23 10:06:25 +0000 UTC]
prescience*
And I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought that!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mast3rlinkx1 In reply to Harzlek [2013-06-13 20:56:39 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that worm looks a bit small to be able to support his weight. A baby one, the ones used for creating the Water of Life, can be held down rather easily by just two people, so I doubt a worm that small could support his weight.
It's still a nice picture, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Harzlek In reply to mast3rlinkx1 [2013-06-29 07:37:07 +0000 UTC]
2 things. It would be more epic if he was not holding the knife out, and I always imagined the worms with really hard rings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
faifreak62 [2010-09-05 23:30:02 +0000 UTC]
OMG SANDWORM XD awesome~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Renegade64 [2010-08-28 20:03:47 +0000 UTC]
Very nice. I actually just started reading the second dune book actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PlagueJester In reply to Renegade64 [2012-12-23 10:07:23 +0000 UTC]
Judging by the date of your post, I'm afraid I'm too late to stop you.
If you have any plans for reading any more, stop. Don't. Leave it alone at the first book. The second is awful, the third is worse, the fourth is worse than the third, and it continues down this pattern until they finally end.
Though the prequel books are pretty good, so far as I've read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mast3rlinkx1 In reply to Renegade64 [2013-06-13 20:57:58 +0000 UTC]
I only read the first book. It's just not Dune anymore if it's not on the desert planet of Arrakis, rather than a lush forest planet that happens to be of the same name. Without sand, what would happen to the sandworms?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Renegade64 In reply to mast3rlinkx1 [2013-06-14 19:29:08 +0000 UTC]
The actually go extinct but then after a couple 1000 years they return. Seriously thats what happens in the 4th book if I remember correctly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mast3rlinkx1 In reply to Renegade64 [2013-06-16 00:35:49 +0000 UTC]
Thing is, it's not even possible for a desert planet to be converted into a lush forest world. It's just not. It would have been better if there were patches of forest among a planet that was still mostly desert.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Renegade64 In reply to mast3rlinkx1 [2013-06-16 07:22:32 +0000 UTC]
Well it wasn`t the entire planet but most of it. Also I think it took over a 1000 years to transform it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mast3rlinkx1 In reply to Renegade64 [2013-06-16 14:04:41 +0000 UTC]
I just doubt a desert planet could become mostly lush. I'd say it would gain a water table and some patches of lush forest oases, but would remain desert for the most part. You couldn't make that much lush forest without offworld assistance, and I believe they didn't have offworld assistance for that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Renegade64 In reply to mast3rlinkx1 [2013-06-16 19:20:45 +0000 UTC]
I can`t remember how they did it exactly. Its been a few years since I read that book.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
caerbran [2010-08-17 14:00:46 +0000 UTC]
Nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PlagueJester [2010-08-07 19:44:48 +0000 UTC]
Love it. Nicely done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
toidarian [2010-04-14 02:23:13 +0000 UTC]
Man's a bit big on that worm (they're, like, two kilometers long! According to the book) but this looks really cool. I especially like the lighting and the . . . maw. Of the worm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngelForHer In reply to toidarian [2010-07-17 18:41:15 +0000 UTC]
The later books (Children of dune, God Emperor of Dune) both give greater detail for Sandworm size Especially God Emperor...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
toidarian In reply to AngelForHer [2010-07-17 22:29:05 +0000 UTC]
They actually got smaller over time, as I recall. :0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngelForHer In reply to toidarian [2010-07-18 06:43:29 +0000 UTC]
due to planet transformation yes but first book they could be massive. In God Emperor there is only one left and its psudohuman but still massive
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Uber-Stooge In reply to AngelForHer [2012-11-27 00:37:03 +0000 UTC]
I always thought if they were too giant they could not be steered with a hook under their skin. In the book it was kept vague and in the movies they were way to large
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
strikenail [2010-02-06 19:56:10 +0000 UTC]
This is so amazing! *___* I loved the movie especially for the sandworms!
This picture also looks like a closeup of this one submitted just a month earlier: [link]
XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
leywad In reply to shalotka [2009-10-07 17:12:45 +0000 UTC]
Yes that's true, but when I drew it I had not read descriptive passage yet.
Sorry for my poor english :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zilla774 [2009-04-15 18:59:24 +0000 UTC]
very nicely rendered. has a good feeling of size and movement. good job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0