Comments: 93
LadyInkx [2013-01-28 20:04:10 +0000 UTC]
This is beautiful!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TigerrrSharrrk [2012-10-14 03:04:27 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful Pose!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rainbowluver568 [2012-09-16 23:27:02 +0000 UTC]
IGNORE applegrassxx, this is beautiful. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RainWolf1994 [2012-09-14 06:36:02 +0000 UTC]
Does that owl on the neck have any relevance to Craig Owens C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shaakespeare [2012-09-14 05:26:19 +0000 UTC]
Congratulation! A winner is you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rpersona [2012-09-14 04:11:45 +0000 UTC]
Didn't know someone could be this beautiful. Wow
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RobertDobolinaEsq [2012-09-14 03:52:32 +0000 UTC]
Well, the comments are certainly something. Always good to know that the petty, prudish and creepy, misogynistic variants of asshole are equally well represented on dA. Don't let either of them get to you, this is excellent work in its genre and deserves to be here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BladeOfJade [2012-09-14 03:48:00 +0000 UTC]
So much rage, I wish I looked even HALF as good as she does....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
warman546 [2012-09-14 03:22:54 +0000 UTC]
super beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SolidSamurai [2012-09-14 03:01:33 +0000 UTC]
whaaaat
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IMCMdrawings [2012-09-14 03:00:21 +0000 UTC]
love !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kachlae [2012-09-14 02:52:03 +0000 UTC]
this looks like how i stretch loool |D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 02:33:04 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Owner
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 04:22:36 +0000 UTC]
A DD in the Photography / People & Portraits / Pin-up section does not take away a slot for a DD in the paintings section, lol. Why don't you go suggest those paintings to that category's volunteer, and stop trying to get your fellow females to feel bad about feeling good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 07:09:43 +0000 UTC]
She as an individual is a disgrace to half the human population? And how, would you have all women act and look?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AppleGrassxx In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 07:20:51 +0000 UTC]
Look however they want but not act like this, skanks like her are the reason many men still label women as nothing more than sex objects
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 07:27:15 +0000 UTC]
So women should not be allowed to show an enjoyment of their body or an interest in sex so that stupid people will not make stupid generalizations?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AppleGrassxx In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 07:35:39 +0000 UTC]
No but they should not deliberately post sexual used images of them selves on art website male or female.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 07:49:03 +0000 UTC]
"Sexual used"? What are you trying to mean by that? An image can be both sexual and art, just as an image can be both violent and art, both amusing and art, both political and art, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AppleGrassxx In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 07:50:30 +0000 UTC]
Yeah but this isn't art in the slightest
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 07:57:01 +0000 UTC]
Haha. And what is art? Anything designed is "art". Art's not a very special word. This may be art you don't like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AppleGrassxx In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 08:03:39 +0000 UTC]
Art s prethought designed planned not a photo that's been done a billion times before of a slutty average looking model. A quick snap isn't art, a planned thought out ORIGINAL photo is, and this ain't original
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 08:20:24 +0000 UTC]
If she is a model, then wouldn't that imply that this image was planned? By your definition, wouldn't almost all nature and street photography not be art, as it isn't planned but captured as it's seen? Art's allot more free than that. Art doesn't need to be original either. Art can be original. And, there is nothing wrong with a person being sexual. I'm pretty sure this is art that you do not like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
AppleGrassxx In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 08:43:48 +0000 UTC]
This isn't art thought. Art is original it has to be or it infriges copyrights. I don't like it, of course I don't because it's a poorly taken shot of a skank that isn't even art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
linientreu In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 09:33:19 +0000 UTC]
no art?!? Then try to shoot a really good photo of a man/woman, please.
It is not easy to make a really good photo - how can you presume only that a poor shot? If you have no idea, maybe you should hold back a little. It is otherwise very disrespectful to the model and the photographer.
And no one is forcing you to like the picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AppleGrassxx In reply to linientreu [2012-09-14 09:53:00 +0000 UTC]
It's not hard at all, Infact even little kids could do it. Disrespectful? Your serious haha by putting it on the Internet I legally can say whatever the fuck I like about your ugly picture and the cheap prostitute you used as a 'model'. As long as I don't make death threats I can say anything I like and I will.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tugera In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 09:12:10 +0000 UTC]
This image infringes copy rights now? Who are the copy right holders? Is the color yellow original? Is the movement of walking? Is the idea of an object falling, or the sky having clouds in it? What about genres? Can there only be one horror movie, one detective novel? Genres work because people like the feel of an idea, an image, so they repeat it with differentiations, changing it a bit, but still incorporating that same feel. An image of a human body is not original, thus, if we were to say art must be original, no image of a human body, a rat, a tree, anything made in a color or in grey tones, or made of a pencil line or brush stroke or captured with a camera, could be art. This is very silly. I don't think you really believe what you're typing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
AppleGrassxx In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 09:56:29 +0000 UTC]
It's a replication of a copyrighted photo using a very simular model inthe same patterned bikini with the same colour hair same kind of earings same pose same background. That's copyright infrigment . It's as bad as copying out micky mouse making him an inch taller and calling him your original character.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I-Shot-Roger-Rabbit In reply to Tugera [2012-09-14 08:40:11 +0000 UTC]
This IS art. And very good art too. I suggest that you report her; she's been deliberately going around on dA and threatening to get people banned for art which she a) does not like, b) is in the 'wrong category' and c) involves Sonic the Hedgehod (she really hates him for some reason...). Lots of other people are reporting her for threatening to report genuine artworks like this brilliant model-posed photo. Join the crusade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cthehalo In reply to AppleGrassxx [2012-09-14 02:44:59 +0000 UTC]
I think you need to figure out the difference between a "slutty picture" and "artistic photography". I personally see nothing slutty about this picture. Its seductive, it's creative, the pose is unique, the body art is lovely, and she's a beautiful girl. Because she's in her underwear you think it's trashy? I see nothing obscene in this picture. In fact, the garments she is wearing are doing a good job of hiding anything that would make this picture inappropriate. lol.
I definitely think this was deserving of the DD.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
poohdog9000 [2012-09-14 01:50:35 +0000 UTC]
nice art. she's gonna look creepy later on in life. but cute art
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chewyfluke [2012-09-14 01:38:25 +0000 UTC]
I like this for a lot of reasons. My favorite part is that there's no feminists in the comments. Ha ha!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
XSocialGraffitiX [2012-09-14 01:06:05 +0000 UTC]
Everything about this picture is so beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
XSocialGraffitiX [2012-09-14 01:04:52 +0000 UTC]
Everything about this is beautiful. The tats, outfit, and you! You've got a gorgeous look and you remind me of Dita Von Tesse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pawsquish [2012-09-14 00:59:01 +0000 UTC]
This is an amazing photo! Not because of the choice of outfit -- though, that is a plus! -- there's just something about this image that's extremely intriguing. She is truly gorgeous, and I'm loving the tattoos and the red gingham, it makes for a great contrast with her beautiful black hair. Also, the pose is so seductive and looks perfect! Congrats on the DD, you earned it! c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dagoth-jeff [2012-09-14 00:52:09 +0000 UTC]
Who is she...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ennyh [2012-09-14 00:11:52 +0000 UTC]
I
LOVED
the tattos! ;-;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>