HOME | DD

Loneanimator β€” Midnight On the Plain of Stones

#bbc #beast #british #creature #english #monster #planet #scifi #space #spiridon #tv #jogrant #thirddoctor #thals #daleks #doctorwho #jonpertwee #3rddoctor
Published: 2017-04-29 11:30:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 2822; Favourites: 82; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description When you get to this part of the classic Doctor Who serial "Planet of the Daleks" you never really see the dangerous animals of Spiridon, you only hear their noises and see their glowing eyes. But here's how I imagined some of them.
Related content
Comments: 19

CrimsonParkDog [2017-06-13 23:41:19 +0000 UTC]

Nice interpretations.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to CrimsonParkDog [2017-06-19 06:55:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! My childhood mind was boiling with mysterious alien beasties when watching this sequence in the serial. Now I've let them out of my skull!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rogue-Ranger [2017-05-02 00:10:19 +0000 UTC]

If on the third doctor had this kind of a budget! Albeit they were creative with their limited means, but seeing all these creatures would be pretty interesting. Great job filling in the blanks so to speak!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to Rogue-Ranger [2017-05-02 06:24:33 +0000 UTC]

The fact is, I can't think of an all-bad 3d Doctor adventure; I like them all! What do you think about the special edition versions of old serials, where they've added CGI spaceships, laser effects from guns, etc?
I recently watched the spec ed version of Day of the Daleks, where they've added more Daleks and Ogrons, and lots more explosions and other effects. It did add quite a bit to the visual side of the serial, and therefore also, the drama at the end battle. The producer of this spec ed brought up an interesting point: This is how I remember it as a kid. His mind, as well as the minds of lots of other people, had added those laser beams and extra Daleks, which really weren't there at all in the original version. The spec ed made the serial what it was in his childhood mind, which I think is justifiable.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rogue-Ranger In reply to Loneanimator [2017-05-16 11:34:46 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I've noticed this too. I actually just recently saw a revamped version of a game I'd played as a kid and then saw the original and could swear the original never had such primitive graphics. And it's the same with shows. I do like the improved special effects, like how they redid the Enterprise exterior shots in Star Trek TOS while staying true to the episode. They take the same care with adding to Doctor Who as well. Although, I like to think I still have enough of an imagination that my mind can add its own special effects.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to Rogue-Ranger [2017-05-17 06:20:57 +0000 UTC]

We'll still have the original broadcast versions of old TV shows. If we're displeased with the "improved" versions, we can always go back to those.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

grassa48 [2017-04-30 04:43:30 +0000 UTC]

KIDS! The horror...the horror.


Dr. Who doesn't float my boat, but this piece does.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to grassa48 [2017-04-30 19:26:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

scorpionlover42 [2017-04-29 21:56:11 +0000 UTC]

It's too bad the Dr. Who budget didn't cover more than noises and glowing eyes. These creatures would have really amped up the horror. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to scorpionlover42 [2017-04-30 19:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Still, you have to applaud their inventiveness. They couldn't show the monsters, but they're still there in the dark.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scorpionlover42 In reply to Loneanimator [2017-04-30 22:59:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh, you certainly do have to applaud them.Β  They made do with what they had and still managed to produce a good show. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

japender61 [2017-04-29 19:33:48 +0000 UTC]

When I think of Dr. Who, I think of Jon Pertwee. Excellent job here, you've really captured the feeling of terror well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to japender61 [2017-04-30 19:27:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! Yes, he's one of my favorites too. Almost all of Pertwees stuff is really good.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HUBLERDON [2017-04-29 14:09:35 +0000 UTC]

You should do your own Doctor Who episode. Personally, I find the mutated biota of Skaro an interesting subject.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to HUBLERDON [2017-04-29 16:26:22 +0000 UTC]

I am going to do an illustration of those Skaro monsters at some point, and I have been toying with the idea of making a Β all-stopmotion YouTube video about Daleks vs mutated monsters on Skaro. I'm a little hesitant, due to BBC copyright issues, but I might go ahead with it eventually.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HUBLERDON In reply to Loneanimator [2017-04-30 15:36:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, wouldn't it fall into fair use?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to HUBLERDON [2017-04-30 16:29:54 +0000 UTC]

Mmm...Don't know actually. But it seems the BBC have been very lenient with fan productions. There are lots of them on YouTube.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mara999 [2017-04-29 13:39:37 +0000 UTC]

Jon Pertwee is probably my favourite of all the Doctors. Sometimes I wonder what it could have been like if he had been in a more big-budget production, where they could have run wild with the more impressive monster-effects they had perfected, such as the Drashigs. I would really like to see a Corman-ish Bond-movie with fantastical monsters, starring Pertwee.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Loneanimator In reply to Mara999 [2017-04-29 16:29:30 +0000 UTC]

Pertwee is certainly the most Bond-like of all the Doctors, mainly working for a defense organisation, being sent as an agent by the Timelords to all corners of the universe, with cars and gadets, etc.
I think we can look back on all eras of Doctor Who and imagine what might've been with bigger budgets. Unfortunately, it'll have to be only in our imaginations.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0