HOME | DD

loqutor β€” Pro Life Stamp

Published: 2009-09-24 22:05:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 2044; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description I am a TRUE pro-lifer, thank you very much. I consider human life to be sacred while in the womb and after birth, which means that I am against abortion (unless giving birth would endanger the mother's life), against euthanasia (unless the patient demands it), and against the death penalty. What right do we, as human beings, have to decide who gets to live and who gets to die? We must preserve human life.

And no, I don't think it's acceptable to bomb abortion clinics. I want nothing to do with the crowd who endorses such horrible things.
Related content
Comments: 164

MrScrore [2022-11-19 11:37:03 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Licca-ChanFTW [2022-11-10 02:23:23 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Meztli72 [2022-01-07 04:17:10 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

xXLordOfSinXx [2018-08-26 20:08:13 +0000 UTC]

Hope you are not pro-weapons.......if you are pro-weapons then you are STILL NOT pro-life!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

siIverware [2017-02-08 00:37:00 +0000 UTC]

and imΒ a true pro-choicer
that doesntΒ sound right god fucking damnit

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

sammy-the-sam In reply to siIverware [2017-02-08 05:03:56 +0000 UTC]

dammit is right, the only time choice is involved here is in euthanasia. the other times it is pro-death.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

siIverware In reply to sammy-the-sam [2017-02-08 05:17:08 +0000 UTC]

mhm yeah if youreΒ going to use that argument you better be vegan

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

sammy-the-sam In reply to siIverware [2017-02-08 06:08:33 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, you think humans have equal rights as other animals? that's foolish.Β 

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

siIverware In reply to sammy-the-sam [2017-02-08 23:53:19 +0000 UTC]

life = animals as well
and you know whats even more foolish??? the fact that you think that a fetus is more important than a womans entire life lmfao

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

sammy-the-sam In reply to siIverware [2017-02-09 00:17:45 +0000 UTC]

This isn't a place to discuss animal ethics. We are talking about human lives, which have human souls. Human souls have intrinisc value which is more valuable than animal souls. (this has to do with philosophy and ethics)

pro-life people believe life is the most paramount thing. If a woman's life is in danger, the fetus should be aborted. If the woman is healthy, the fetus has value and needs to be born. Do not abort based off of convenience. Life isn't based on convenience. Death forced upon any being with a human soul is wrong.Β 

If you've ever visited another pro-life stamp, you should know this by now. If a woman's life is in danger, abortion is okay. (I've seen the same thing stated in every pro-life stamp)

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Nidobunny [2016-08-07 22:13:44 +0000 UTC]

are you a vegan?

because you should care about ALL lives!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

wakaflockaflame1 [2016-06-09 21:14:21 +0000 UTC]

Agreed

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

sammy-the-sam [2016-04-03 18:53:48 +0000 UTC]

this is the most perfect stamp

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

siIverware In reply to sammy-the-sam [2017-02-08 00:31:30 +0000 UTC]

how tfΒ is this perfect lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sammy-the-sam In reply to siIverware [2017-02-08 05:01:18 +0000 UTC]

believing in life for everyone, not just the wealthy and not just the people who "want" to be born! it would be perfect if we allowed life to go as it ought to.Β 

people are killed for "justice" reasons and for convenience reasons, that is wrong on so many levels as it puts power into people who have no right to take the life from someone.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tultsi93 [2015-12-03 09:30:12 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jayfeatherlover4 In reply to tultsi93 [2016-03-28 00:02:59 +0000 UTC]

Dogs aren't as valuable as human beings.Β  A full-grown dog will never be as important to human society than a newborn child.Β  Why?Β  When humans start killing humans, the world goes to pot.Β  This is why it is acceptable to kill an adult pig for food, but not a newborn child.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tultsi93 In reply to jayfeatherlover4 [2016-03-28 05:58:20 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jayfeatherlover4 In reply to tultsi93 [2016-03-31 00:40:46 +0000 UTC]

No death is ever "right."Β  What matters is what the mother thinks in this situation, right?Β  At least, according to you it is, right?Β  My mother nearly bled out while giving birth to me - she would have died for me, and has told me that from the start.Β  Every single mother I've spoken to - and my many years of living, I've talked with a TON - agree with her.Β  Each and every one of them is willing to give up their life for their child to live.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ZekeEugene In reply to jayfeatherlover4 [2016-04-10 05:26:42 +0000 UTC]

When it comes to the rare case of abortion in the rare but not unheard of case of a specific pregnancy endangering the mother's life, I know that nobody should be forced to make a sacrifice of their own life that they do not want to make.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mochalocalicious [2015-08-05 20:42:20 +0000 UTC]

Finally ! Someone with great ideals on the stance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AvelineBurkhart [2015-07-21 21:48:09 +0000 UTC]

Wow, a pro-lifer that believes the same thing as me! That's so rare.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlueSapphireGamer [2014-10-14 22:08:05 +0000 UTC]

I wish all pro-lifers were like you. Sane and sensible.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

MrScrore In reply to BlueSapphireGamer [2022-11-19 11:37:45 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ClassicallyOrnate [2013-07-16 18:59:49 +0000 UTC]

You are by far the sanest Pro-life person I have ever seen! XD There should be more like you. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vaidlus [2013-07-06 21:06:12 +0000 UTC]

So, you would force a rape victim to suffer even more pain and humiliation because you do not approve of abortion? She has already had her rights violated and control of her body stolen, and you want to steal that control from her again? You only care about not letting people die, but you obviously do not care about their suffering (which by the way, could lead to suicide).

Even though rape pregnancy statistics are low, that doesn't change the impact it has on the VICTIMS.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Way-Gway [2013-01-05 02:13:48 +0000 UTC]

I disagree with this statement - abortion should be and option for unwanted pregnancies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-21 15:19:23 +0000 UTC]

of so just because raising a child would be an inconvenience a child should die?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-21 19:41:28 +0000 UTC]

Children who are already born - no.

Fetuses - depends on how much of an inconvenience.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-21 20:11:05 +0000 UTC]

i'm talking like having to get up a late at night and being an ear sore

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-22 22:00:09 +0000 UTC]

Could you please elaborate and use proper grammar while doing so? I don't think I quite understand what, exactly, you're trying to ask.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-23 11:51:18 +0000 UTC]

what i meant was,it depends on reasoning,if your aborting a baby just because you don't want the responsibility or you will lose a couple hours of sleep or it'll get in the way of school work,than i can't forgive you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-23 12:51:50 +0000 UTC]

Well, I suppose that depends.

If they did so to avoid responsibility, because they know they are not responsible enough, than I would consider abortion a logical course of action.

Just because the thought of being woken up at night is daunting? I like a good nights sleep as much as the next person, but if that's the reason someone is going to have an abortion, they're either a fuck-tard or immature.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-23 12:55:27 +0000 UTC]

the first would be handled by giving the baby to someone you trust

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-23 12:58:48 +0000 UTC]

True, but the woman would still have to go through with the nine months, plus the pain in the ass that is childbirth.

There's also the situation, wherein, no one the mother trusts is willing to raise a baby for her.

In case you planned on pulling the adoption card, there are quite enough children in orphanages as it is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-23 13:05:24 +0000 UTC]

then hold a screening of experienced mothers

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-23 19:37:28 +0000 UTC]

They may not be able to find any willing mothers. Plus, she would still have to go through nine months of carrying the thing and childbirth.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-23 20:56:29 +0000 UTC]

like i said she could have a screening,a small aptitude test to see if someone would be able to take care of the baby without screwing their minds up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-24 05:14:03 +0000 UTC]

True, but who wants to go through nine months of carrying a baby they don't want, plus the agony of childbirth, so that someone else can take care of the baby?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lokitheinvinsable In reply to Way-Gway [2013-03-25 23:05:51 +0000 UTC]

well it's not a perfect method but at least no one get's killed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Way-Gway In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2013-03-26 22:49:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh, yes. Let's all make women go through with their pregnancy, so they can deal with the hassle of finding someone willing to take care of the baby, because LORD FORBID she have an abortion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

siathedragon [2012-08-28 23:20:09 +0000 UTC]

do you mean animals too ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

belarussia22 [2012-01-15 20:52:24 +0000 UTC]

i was 11 and had one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

loqutor In reply to belarussia22 [2012-01-16 00:32:59 +0000 UTC]

Troll harder.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

belarussia22 In reply to loqutor [2012-01-16 00:37:05 +0000 UTC]

not a troll, putting information out there. im open about, so y not share it? lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

steinhakasei [2011-12-31 08:23:12 +0000 UTC]

Pro life as a concept exists, in practice it does not. No matter how you slice it, you are selective over what you deem worthy of protection.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tsubasacorrupted [2011-12-15 19:27:15 +0000 UTC]

"What right do we, as human beings, have to decide who gets to live and who gets to die?"
that can be applied to u as well

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

loqutor In reply to tsubasacorrupted [2011-12-15 20:24:37 +0000 UTC]

I don't get it. What are you trying to say?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tsubasacorrupted In reply to loqutor [2011-12-15 20:33:44 +0000 UTC]

im saying that your own statement can be applied to u as well

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

loqutor In reply to tsubasacorrupted [2011-12-16 08:37:27 +0000 UTC]

In what way?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>